Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 17, 2017

Rachel Weeping: Intertextuality as a Means of Transforming the Readers’ Worldview

  • Sébastien Doane EMAIL logo


The episode of the Bethlehem massacre (Matt 2:16-18) uses many levels of intertextuality as a rhetorical device, to solicit an emotional response powerful enough to influence the reader’s worldview. What effect do these intertexts have on Matthew’s readers? How is this affective appeal concerning Rachel’s tears intended to impact the reader’s response to Matthew’s story? Rachel weeping is an emotionally charged image that somehow merges two opposites: hope and sorrow. The intertextuality of this figure can influence readers encouraging them to criticize imperial ideologies that have used violence against innocent people in the past, and oppose those which do so currently.

Works Cited

Aichele, George, and Gary Allen Phillips. 1995. “Introduction: Exegesis, Eisegesis, Intergesis. Intertextuality and the Bible. ” Semeia 69–70, 7–18, Atlanta: Scholars Press.Search in Google Scholar

Albright, William Foxwell, and C. S. Mann. 1971. Matthew. Garden City: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Allison, Dale C. 1993. The New Moses: A Matthean Typology. Minneapolis: Fortress.Search in Google Scholar

Atkinson, Basil Ferris Campbell. 1952. The Christian’s Use of the Old Testament. London: InterVarsity Fellowship.Search in Google Scholar

Aus, Roger David. 2004. Matthew 1–2 and the Virginal Conception: In Light of Palestinian and Hellenistic Judaic Traditions on the Birth of Israel’s First Redeemer, Moses. Lanham: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beach, W. 1969. “Advent Amid the Slaughter of the Innocents.” Christianity and Crisis 29: 322–323.Search in Google Scholar

Becking, Bob. 1994 “‘A Voice was Heard in Ramah.’ Remarks on Structure and Meaning of Jr 31.15–17.” Biblisches Zeitschrift 38: 238.10.1163/25890468-03802005Search in Google Scholar

Betsworth, Sharon, 2010. “The Child and Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew.” Journal of Childhood and Religion: 1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Bloch, Renée. 1955. Quelques Aspects de la Figure De Moïse dans la Tradition Rabbinique. Paris: Cahiers Sioniens.Search in Google Scholar

Bright, John. 1965. Jeremiah: Introduction, Translation, and Notes. Garden City: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Jeannine K. 2012. “Genesis in Matthew.” In Genesis in the New Testament, edited by Maarten J. J. Menke, and Steve Moyise. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. 1993. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. New York/London: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, J. B. and Centre for Development and Population Activities. 1996. “Justice for Rachel’s children.” Interfaith Reflections on Women, Poverty and Population: 95–101.Search in Google Scholar

Camus, Albert. 1957. The Fall. New York: Vintage.Search in Google Scholar

Carter, Warren. 2007. “Matthew’s Gospel: An Anti-Imperial/Imperial Reading.” Currents in Theology and Mission 34: 424–433.Search in Google Scholar

Carter, Warren. 2015. “Matthew and Empire.” Union Seminary Quarterly Review 59: 86–91;Search in Google Scholar

Chrysostom, John. 1888. “Homilies of St. John Chrysostom, Archbishop of Constantinople on the Gospel according to St. Matthew.” In Saint Chrysostom: Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew, Vol. 10, edited by Philip Schaff, translated by George Prevost and M. B. Riddle. New York: Christian Literature Company.Search in Google Scholar

Claasen, Juliana. 2009. “The Image of the Wailing Woman and the Task of the Feminist Theologian: With Special Attention to the Role of Lament in the Book of Matthew.” In Ragbag Theologies: Essays in Honour of Denise Ackermann, a Feminist Theologian of Praxis, edited by M. Pillay, S. Nadar and C. Le Bruyns, 193–204. Stellenbosch: Sun Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crossan, John Dominic. 2003. “Virgin Mother or Bastard Child?” Hervormde teologiese studies 59/3: 663–691.10.4102/hts.v59i3.668Search in Google Scholar

Crow, Bernard. 2013. “Fulfillment in Matthew as Eschatological Reversal.” Westminster Theological Journal 75: 111–127.Search in Google Scholar

Culler, Jonathan. 1981. The Pursuit of Signs: Semiotics, Literature, Deconstruction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.2307/3684090Search in Google Scholar

Davies, W. D., and Dale C. Allison. 1988. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. Vol. 1: Introduction and Commentary on Matthew I-VII. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Search in Google Scholar

Emadi, Samuel. 2015. “Intertextuality in New Testament Scholarship: Significance, Criteria, and the Art of Intertextual Reading.” Currents in Biblical Research 14: 8–23.10.1177/1476993X14532747Search in Google Scholar

Erickson, Richard J. 1996. “Divine Injustice? Matthew’s Narrative Strategy and the Slaughter of the Innocents (Matthew 2:13–23).” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 19: 5–27.10.1177/0142064X9701906402Search in Google Scholar

Feske, Millicent C. 2012. “Rachel’s Lament: The Impact of Infertility and Pregnancy Loss upon the Religious Faith of Ordinary Christians.” The Journal of Pastoral Theology 22: 3–17.10.1179/jpt.2012.22.1.003Search in Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley, 1970. “Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics.” New Literary History 2(1): 123–162.10.2307/468593Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Paul. 2015. “Echoes without Resonance: Critiquing Certain Aspects of Recent Scholarly Trends in the Study of the Jewish Scriptures in the New Testament.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 38: 96–11110.1177/0142064X15595941Search in Google Scholar

Forest, J. 1984. “How Far to Bethlehem?” The Otherside 153: 12–13.Search in Google Scholar

Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory J. Seigworth. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822393047Search in Google Scholar

Green, H. Benedict. 1975. The Gospel according to Matthew. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gundry, Robert Horton. 1982. Matthew; A Commentary on his Literary and Theological Art Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Gundry, Robert H. 1967. The Use of the Old Testament in St Matthew’s Gospel with Special Reference to the Messianic Hope. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004265950Search in Google Scholar

Huizenga, Leroy A. 2015. “The Old Testament in the New, Intertextuality and Allegory.” Journal for the Study of the New Testament 38: 17–3510.1177/0142064X15595929Search in Google Scholar

Hill, David. 1981. The Gospel of Matthew. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Holladay, William L., and Paul D. Hanson. 1986. A Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Jeremiah. Minneapolis: Augsburg-Fortress.Search in Google Scholar

Kamanzi, Michel S. 2004. “Rwanda: Quelle réconciliation?” Études: 584.Search in Google Scholar

Klostermann, Erich. 1927. Das Matthäusevangelium. Tübingen: Mohr.Search in Google Scholar

Knowles Micheal 1993. Jeremiah in Matthew’s Gospel: The Rejected Prophet Motif in Matthaean Redaction. Sheffield: JSOT.Search in Google Scholar

Kozol, Jonathan. 1988. Rachel and Her Children: Homeless Families in America. New York: Crown.Search in Google Scholar

Kristeva, Julia. 1969. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, Karl Allen. 2009. The Heart of Biblical Narrative: Rediscovering Biblical Appeal to the Emotions. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lagrange, Marie-Joseph. 1948. Évangile selon Saint Matthieu. Paris, Gabalda.Search in Google Scholar

Lindars, Barnabas. 1961. New Testament Apologetic. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lindars, Barnabas. 1979. “Rachel Weeping for Her Children – Jeremiah 31:15–22.” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 12: 47–62.10.1177/030908927900401205Search in Google Scholar

Lohmeyer, Ernst, and Werner Schmauch. 1958. Das Evangelium des Matthäus, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Luz, Ulrich. 2007. Matthew 1–7: A Commentary. Minneapolis: Fortress.Search in Google Scholar

Mayordomo-Marín, Moisés. 2011. “Matthew 1–2 and the Problem of Intertextuality.” In Infancy Gospels : Stories and Identities, edited by Claire Clivaz, Andreas Dettwiler, Luc Devillers, and Enrico Norelli, 257–279. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar

Mazurel, J. W. 2004. “Citations from the Book of Jeremiah in the New Testament.” In Reading the Book of Jeremiah. A Search for Coherence, edited by Martin Kessler, 181–189. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.10.5325/j.ctv1bxh28c.18Search in Google Scholar

Meier, John. P. 1990. Matthew. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Search in Google Scholar

Míguez, Néstor O. 2014. “The Holy Innocents.” In Global perspectives on the New Testament, edited by Mark Roncace. Pearson: 7–8: Upper Saddle River.Search in Google Scholar

Montgomery, John W. 1981. Slaughter of the Innocents. Westchester: Cornerstone.Search in Google Scholar

Nelson, J. R. 1967. “O Little Town of Phuvinh.” Christian Century 84: 1619–1620.Search in Google Scholar

Nicol, George G. 1985. “The Slaughter of the Innocents.” Expository Times 97/2: 55–56.10.1177/001452468509700211Search in Google Scholar

Nolan, Brian M. 1979. The Royal Son of God. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Oldenburg, Douglas W. 2001. “Remembering Rachel’s Tears: Lament.” Church and Society 91/5: 153–159.Search in Google Scholar

Park, Eugene Eung Chun. 2013. “Rachel’s Cry for Her Children: Matthew’s Treatment of the Infanticide by Herod,” Catholic Biblical Quarterly 75: 473–485.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, Menakhem. 1979. “Literary Dynamics: How the Order of a Text Creates Its Meanings.” Poetics Today 1/2: 35–64.10.2307/1772040Search in Google Scholar

Plummer, Alfred. 1909. An Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St Matthew. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Schaberg, Jane. 1987. The Illegitimacy of Jesus: A Feminist Theological Interpretation of the Infancy Narratives. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, Francis, and C. Everett Koop. 1983. “The Slaughter of the Innocents.” Fundamentalist Journal 2: 21–22.Search in Google Scholar

Schweizer, Eduard. 1975. The Good News according to Matthew. Westminster: John Knox.Search in Google Scholar

Sim, David C. 1996. Apocalyptic Eschatology in the Gospel of Matthew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511555084Search in Google Scholar

Soares-Prabhu, George M. 1976. The Formula Quotations in the Infancy Narrative of Matthew: An Enquiry Into the Tradition History of Mt 1–2. Rome: Biblical Institute Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stendahl, Krister. 1954. The School of St Matthew and Its Use of the Old Testament. Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksells.Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, Meir. 1992 “Telling in Time (II): Chronology, Teleology, Narrativity.” Poetics Today 13: 531–532.10.2307/1772872Search in Google Scholar

Strickert, Frederick M. 2007. “Rachel on the Way: A Model of Faith in Times of Transition.” Currents in Theology and Mission 34: 444–452.Search in Google Scholar

Tasker, R. V. G. 1961. The Gospel According to St. Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Thieme, K., “Auschwitz und Bethlehem.” Kairos 4: 133–134.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, John A. 1980. The Book of Jeremiah. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Search in Google Scholar

Tillich, Paul. 1948. The Shaking of the Foundations. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Tupper, E. Frank. 1991. “The Bethlehem Massacre – Christology against Providence.” Review and Expositor 88: 399–418.10.1177/003463739108800406Search in Google Scholar

Vajnar, Jane. 1986. “The Slaughter of the Innocents.” Transformation 3: 19–20.10.1177/026537888600300411Search in Google Scholar

Wainwright, Elaine Mary. 1997. “Rachel Weeping for Her Children: Intertextuality and the Biblical Testaments – a Feminist Approach.” In Feminist Companion to Reading the Bible: Approaches, Methods and Strategies, edited by Athalya Brenner and Carole Fontaine, 452–469. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wimsatt, W. K., and Monroe Beardsley. 1949. “The Affective Fallacy.” Sewanee Review 57/1: 31–55.Search in Google Scholar

Zahn Theodor. 1903. Das Evangelium des Matthäus. Leipzig: Diechert.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-6-17
Published in Print: 2017-4-25

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 6.6.2023 from
Scroll to top button