Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 3, 2013

Research utilization and evidence-based practice among Saskatchewan massage therapists

  • Donelda M. Gowan-Moody EMAIL logo , Anne M. Leis , Sylvia Abonyi , Michael Epstein and Kalyani Premkumar

Abstract

While massage therapy (MT) is an increasingly used health care service with a growing evidence base, there is insufficient information about the extent to which MT practice is evidence-based. The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive view of Saskatchewan MT’s research utilization to inform the development of evidence-based massage therapy practice. The main objectives of the study were to describe MT’s perceptions of research, their appraised self-efficacy in research literacy and to identify the characteristic of practitioners who use research. Using a survey design all 815 registered members of the Massage Therapist Association of Saskatchewan were invited to complete a mail-out questionnaire. A total of 333 questionnaires were completed and returned for a 41% response rate. Univariate and logistic regression analysis was conducted using SPSS 17.0. While overall perceptions of research were positive, self-efficacy in research literacy was low and research utilization was limited. Characteristics associated with research use included referring to online research databases and peer-reviewed journals, belief that practice should be based on research, and 20 or greater hours per week of practice. Provincial regulatory status may be the first step to quality service delivery and research literacy training and support is needed for practitioners.

References

1. Nasmail E. Complementary and alternative medicine use in Canada: trends in use and public attitudes 1997–2006. Public Policy Sources 2007;87:1–53.Search in Google Scholar

2. Grant KE, Balletto J, Gowan-Moody D, Healey D, Kincaid D, Lowe W, et al. Steps toward massage therapy guidelines: a first report to the profession. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork [Internet] 2008 August [cited 2013 June 23]:1:[about 20p]. Available from http://www.ijtmb.org/index.php/ijtmb/article/view/5/23.10.3822/ijtmb.v1i1.5Search in Google Scholar

3. Okoro CA, Zhao G, Li Chaoyang, Balluz LS. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among USA adults with functional limitations: for treatment or general use? Complement Ther Med 2011;19:208–15.10.1016/j.ctim.2011.06.003Search in Google Scholar

4. Hawk C, Ndetan H, Evans MW. Potential role of complementary and alternative health care providers in chronic disease prevention and health promotion: an analysis of National Health Interview Survey data. Prev Med 2012;54:18–22.10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.07.002Search in Google Scholar

5. Sackett D, Straus S, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

6. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, Cartabellotta A, Martin J, Hopayian K, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ [Internet] 2005 Jan 5 [cited 2013 June 23];5:[7p]. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/5/1.10.1186/1472-6920-5-1Search in Google Scholar

7. Estabrooks C. The conceptual structure of research utilization. Res Nurs Health 1999;22:203–16.10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199906)22:3<203::AID-NUR3>3.0.CO;2-9Search in Google Scholar

8. Hutchinson AM, Johnston L. Beyond the BARRIERS scale: commonly reported barriers to research use. J Nurs Adm 2006;36:189–99.10.1097/00005110-200604000-00008Search in Google Scholar

9. Salbach NM, Jaglal SB, Korner-Bitensky N, Rappolt S, Davis D. Practitioner and organizational barriers to evidence-based practice of physical therapists for people with stroke. Phys Ther 2007;87:1284–303.10.2522/ptj.20070040Search in Google Scholar

10. Knops AM, Vermeulen H, Legemate DA, Ubbink DT. Attitudes, awareness, and barriers regarding evidence-based surgery among surgeons and surgical nurses. World J Surg 2009;33:1348–55.10.1007/s00268-009-0020-8Search in Google Scholar

11. Heiwe S, Nilsson Kajermo K, Raijatyni-Lenne, Guidetti S, Samuelsson M, Anderson I, et al. Evidence-based practice: attitudes, knowledge and behavior among allied health care professionals. Qual Assur Health Care 2011;23:198–209.10.1093/intqhc/mzq083Search in Google Scholar

12. Leach MJ, Gillham D. Are complementary medicine practitioners implementing evidence based practice? Complement Ther Med 2011;19:128–36.10.1016/j.ctim.2011.04.002Search in Google Scholar

13. Suter E, Vanderheyden LC, Trojan LS, Verhoef MJ, Armitage GD. How important is research-based practice to chiropractors and massage therapists? J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30:109–15.10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.013Search in Google Scholar

14. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

15. Estabrooks CA, Scott-Findley S, Rutakumwa W, Duan Q, Rozanova J. The determinants of research utilization in acute care: pain management in adult and paediatric settings. 2004. Retrieved from http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/kusp/pdfs/RU%20report%2027JAN%2020051.pdf on 23 June 2013.Search in Google Scholar

16. Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials. 3rd ed. Hamilton, Canada: BC Decker, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

17. Jette DU, Bacon K, Batty C, Carlson M, Ferland A, Hemingway RD, et al. Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Phys Ther 2003;83:786–805.10.1093/ptj/83.9.786Search in Google Scholar

18. Iles R, Davidson M. Evidence based practice: a survey of physiotherapists’ current practice. Physiother Res Int 2006;11:93–103.10.1002/pri.328Search in Google Scholar

19. Kelner MJ, Boon H, Wellman B, Welsh S. Complementary and alternative groups contemplate the need for effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness research. Complement Ther Med 2002;10:235–9.10.1016/S0965-2299(02)00076-6Search in Google Scholar

20. Stomski N, Grimmer-Somers K, Petkov J. A survey of the uptake and implementation of research evidence by South Australian acupuncturists in clinical practice: attitudes and associated predictive factors. Complement Ther Med 2008;16:199–205.10.1016/j.ctim.2007.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Shroff FM, Sahota IS. How can massage therapy move forward? Registered massage therapists touch on key points shaping their profession in British Columbia, Canada. Home Health Care Manage Pract 2012;24:182–92.10.1177/1084822311429563Search in Google Scholar

22. Porcino AJ, Boon HS, Page SA, Verhoef MJ. Meaning and challenges in the practice of multiple therapeutic massage modalities: a combined methods study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2011;11:75.10.1186/1472-6882-11-75Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Dryden T, Findlay B, Boon H, Mior S, Verhoef M, Baskwill A. Research requirement: literacy amongst complementary and alternative health care practitioners – Phase 1 & Phase 11. Natural Health Products Directorate, Health Canada, 2004. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/sr-sr/pubs/nhp/research_literacy-eng.php. Accessed: 28 June 2008.Search in Google Scholar

24. Williams J, Mulkins A, Verhoef M, Monkman D, Findlay B. Needs assessment: research literacy and capacity amongst complementary and alternative health care providers. In Perspectives on Natural Health Products – Natural Health Products Directorate, Health Canada, 2002. Available at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/dhp-mps/pubs/complement/na-eb_06-02/na-eb_06-02_06_e.html. Accessed 28 June 2008.Search in Google Scholar

25. Boon H, Verhoef M. Building complementary and alternative health care research capacity: workshop report. Complement Ther Med 2002;10:49–51.10.1054/ctim.2002.0512Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. McColl A, Smith H, White P, Field J. General practitioners’ perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998;316:361–5.10.1136/bmj.316.7128.361Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Oliveri RS, Gluud C, Wille-Jørgensen PA. Hospital doctors’ self-rated skills in and use of evidence-based medicine – a questionnaire survey. J Eval Clin Pract 2004;10:219–26.10.1111/j.1365-2753.2003.00477.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Squires JE, Estabrooks CA, Gustavsson P, Wallin L. Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: a systematic review update. Implement Sci [Internet] 2011 Jan 5 [cited 2013 June 23];6:[20p]. Available from http://www.implementationscience.com/content/6/1/1.10.1186/1748-5908-6-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Thompson DS, Estabrooks CA, Scott-Findlay S, Moore K, Wallin L. Interventions aimed at increasing research use in nursing: a systematic review. Implement Sci [Internet] 2007 May 11 [cited 2013 June 23];2:[16p]. Available from http://www.implementationscience.com/content/2/1/15.10.1186/1748-5908-2-15Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Coomarasamy A, Khan K. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ 2004;329:1017.10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1017Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. McEvoy MP, Williams MT, Olds TS. Evidence based practice profiles: differences among allied health professions. BMC Med Educ [Internet] 2010 Oct 12 [cited 2013 June 23];10:[8p]. Available from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1462-6920/10/69.Search in Google Scholar

32. Pain K, Magill-Evans J, Darrah J, Hagler P, Warren S. Effects of profession and facility type on research utilization by rehabilitation professionals. J Allied Health 2004;33:3–9.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-07-22
Accepted: 2013-06-07
Published Online: 2013-07-03

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 29.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jcim-2012-0044/html
Scroll to top button