Abstract
Background
Improved teamwork between conventional and complementary medicine (CM) practitioners is indicated to achieve effective healthcare. However, little is known about interprofessional collaboration and education in the context of integrative medicine (IM).
Methods
This paper reports the findings from a constructivist-grounded theory method study that explored and highlighted Australian medical students’ experiences and opportunities for linking interprofessional collaboration and learning in the context of IM. Following ethical approval, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 medical students from 10 medical education faculties across Australian universities.
Results
Medical students recognised the importance of interprofessional teamwork between general medical practitioners and CM professionals in patient care and described perspectives of shared responsibilities, profession-specific responsibilities, and collaborative approaches within IM. While students identified that limited interprofessional collaboration currently occurred in the medical curriculum, interprofessional education was considered a means of increasing communication and collaboration between healthcare professionals, helping coordinate effective patient care, and understanding each healthcare team members’ professional role and value.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that medical curricula should include opportunities for medical students to develop required skills, behaviours, and attitudes for interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education within the context of IM. While this is a qualitative study that reflects theoretical saturation from a selected cohort of medical students, the results also point to the importance of including CM professionals within interprofessional collaboration, thus contributing to more person-centred care.
Acknowledgments
An Australian Postgraduate Award was accepted to undertake this doctoral research. An Australian Postgraduate Publication Award was accepted to write up this manuscript.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. D’Amour D, Ferrada-Videla M, San Martin Rodriguez L, Beaulieu MD. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J Interprof Care 2005;19:116–31.10.1080/13561820500082529Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Bridges DR, Davidson RA, Odegard PS, Maki IV, Tomkowiak J. Interprofessional collaboration: three best practice models of interprofessional education. Med Educ Online 2011;16:1–10.10.3402/meo.v16i0.6035Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Green C. Relative distancing: a grounded theory of how learners negotiate the interprofessional. J Interprof Care 2013;27:34–42.10.3109/13561820.2012.720313Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;3:CD000072.10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub2Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Manser T. Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;53:143–51.10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Suter E, Arndt J, Arthur N, Parboosingh J, Taylor E, Deutschlander S. Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. J Interprof Care 2009;23:41–51.10.1080/13561820802338579Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Hammick M, Freeth D, Koppel I, Reeves S, Barr H. A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Med Teach 2007;29:735–51.10.1080/01421590701682576Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Hollenberg D, Bourgeault IL. Linking integrative medicine with interprofessional education and care initiatives: challenges and opportunities for interprofessional collaboration. J Interprof Care 2011;25:182–8.10.3109/13561820.2011.552133Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Dobos G. Integrative medicine: medicine of the future or ‘old wine in new skins’? Eur J Integr Med 2009;1:109–15.10.1016/j.eujim.2009.08.001Search in Google Scholar
10. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: what’s in a name? 2008. Available at: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam. Accessed: 10 Jan 2014.Search in Google Scholar
11. Boon H, Verhoef M, O’Hara D, Findlay B, Majid N. Integrative healthcare: arriving at a working definition. Altern Ther Health Med 2004;10:48–56.Search in Google Scholar
12. Academic Consortium for Integrative Medicine and Health. About us. 2015. Available at: https://www.imconsortium.org/about/about-us.cfm. Accessed: 29 Sept 2015.Search in Google Scholar
13. Ker J, Mole L, Bradley P. Early introduction to interprofessional learning: a simulated ward environment. Med Educ 2003;37:248–55.10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01439.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Morison S, Boohan M, Moutray M, Jenkins J. Developing pre-qualification inter-professional education for nursing and medical students: sampling student attitudes to guide development. Nurse Educ Pract 2004;4:20–9.10.1016/S1471-5953(03)00015-5Search in Google Scholar
15. Rosenfield D, Oandasan I, Reeves S. Perceptions versus reality: a qualitative study of students’ expectations and experiences of interprofessional education. Med Educ 2011;45:471–7.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03883.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Worzala KT, Glaser KM, McGinley A. A collaborative curriculum for medical and nursing students. Med Educ 2006;40:478.10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02431.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Brock D, Abu-Rish E, Chiu CR, Hammer D, Wilson S, Vorvick L, et al. Interprofessional education in team communication: working together to improve patient safety. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:414–23.10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000952Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Nisbet G, Hendry GD, Rolls G, Field MJ. Interprofessional learning for pre-qualification health care students: an outcomes-based evaluation. J Interprof Care 2008;22:57–68.10.1080/13561820701722386Search in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Jacobsen F, Fink AM, Marcussen V, Larsen K, Hansen TB. Interprofessional undergraduate clinical learning: results from a three year project in a Danish interprofessional training unit. J Interprof Care 2009;23:30–40.10.1080/13561820802490909Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Faresjo T. Interprofessional education: to break boundaries and build bridges. Rural Remote Health 2006;6:602.10.22605/RRH602Search in Google Scholar
21. Templeman K, Robinson A, McKenna L. Student identification of the need for complementary medicine education in Australian medical curricula: a constructivist grounded theory approach. Complement Ther Med 2015;23:257–64.10.1016/j.ctim.2015.02.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Templeman K, Robinson A, McKenna L. Integrating complementary medicine literacy education into Australian medical curricula: student-identified techniques and strategies for implementation. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2015;21:238–46.10.1016/j.ctcp.2015.09.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Willison KD. Advancing integrative medicine through interprofessional education. Health Sociol Rev 2008;17:342–52.10.5172/hesr.451.17.4.342Search in Google Scholar
24. Gaboury I, Bujold M, Boon H, Moher D. Interprofessional collaboration within Canadian integrative healthcare clinics: key components. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:707–15.10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.048Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Birks M, Mills J. Grounded theory: a practical guide. London: Sage Publications, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
26. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
27. Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969.Search in Google Scholar
28. Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin, 1998.Search in Google Scholar
29. National School Network. 2013 QS Australian university rankings for medicine. 2008. Available at: http://www.university-list.net/Australia/rank/univ-090012.html. Accessed: 29 Jan 2013.Search in Google Scholar
30. Birks M, Mills J, Francis K, Chapman Y. A thousand words paint a picture: the use of storyline in grounded theory research. J Res Nurs 2009;14:405–17.10.1177/1744987109104675Search in Google Scholar
31. Hertweck ML, Hawkins SR, Bednarek ML, Goreczny AJ, Schreiber JL, Sterrett SE. Attitudes towards interprofessional education: comparing physician assistant and other health care professions students. J Physician Assist Educ 2012;23:8–15.10.1097/01367895-201223020-00003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
32. Lumague M, Morgan A, Mak D, Hanna M, Kwong J, Cameron C, et al. Interprofessional education: the student perspective. J Interprof Care 2006;20:246–53.10.1080/13561820600717891Search in Google Scholar PubMed
33. Woodroffe J, Spencer J, Rooney K, Le Q, Allen P. The RIPPER experience: a three-year evaluation of an Australian interprofessional rural health education pilot. J Res Interprof Pract Educ 2012;2:230–47.10.22230/jripe.2012v2n2a51Search in Google Scholar
34. Lindqvist S, Duncan A, Shepstone L, Watts F, Pearce S. Case-based learning in cross-professional groups: the development of a pre-registration interprofessional learning programme. J Interprof Care 2005;19:509–20.10.1080/13561820500126854Search in Google Scholar PubMed
35. Olenick M, Allen LR, Smego Jr RA. Interprofessional education: a concept analysis. Adv Med Educ Pract 2010;1:75–84.Search in Google Scholar
36. Lapkin S, Levett-Jones T, Gilligan C. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interprofessional programs in health professional programs. Nurse Educ Today 2013;33:90–102.10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
37. Rodehorst T, Wilhelm S, Jensen L. Use of interdisciplinary simulation to understand perceptions of team members’ roles. J Prof Nurs 2005;21:159–66.10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.04.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
38. McNair R, Stone N, Sims J, Curtis C. Australian evidence for interprofessional education contributing to effective teamwork preparation and interest in rural practice. J Interprof Care 2005;19:579–94.10.1080/13561820500412452Search in Google Scholar PubMed
39. Infante C. Bridging the “system’s” gap between interprofessional care and patient safety: sociological insights. J Interprof Care 2006;20:517–25.10.1080/13561820600937598Search in Google Scholar PubMed
40. Templeman K, Robinson A. Integrative medicine models in contemporary primary health care. Complement Ther Med 2011;19:84–92.10.1016/j.ctim.2011.02.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
41. Hean S, Clark JM, Adams K, Humphris D. Will opposites attract? Similarities and differences in students’ perceptions of the stereotype profiles of other health and social care professional groups. J Interprof Care 2006;20:162–81.10.1080/13561820600646546Search in Google Scholar PubMed
42. Liaw SY, Siau C, Zhou WT, Lau TC. Interprofessional simulation-based education program: a promising approach for changing stereotypes and improving attitudes toward nurse–physician collaboration. Appl Nurs Res 2014;27:258–60.10.1016/j.apnr.2014.03.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
43. Henderson Y. Facilitating change in clinical practice. Pract Nurse 2012;42:36–40.Search in Google Scholar
44. Pollard K. Students engagement in interprofessional working in practice placement settings. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:2846–56.10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02608.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
45. Audet AM, Davis K, Schoenbaum SC. Adoption of patient-centered care practices by physicians. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:754–9.10.1001/archinte.166.7.754Search in Google Scholar PubMed
46. Xyrichis A, Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? Int J Nurs Stud 2008;45:140–53.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed
47. Hughes B, Fitzpatrick J. Nurse–physician collaboration in an acute care community hospital. J Interprof Care 2010;24:625–32.10.3109/13561820903550804Search in Google Scholar PubMed
48. Reeves S, Goldman J, Burton A, Sawatzky-Girling B. Synthesis of systematic review evidence of interprofessional education. J Allied Health 2010;39:198–203.Search in Google Scholar
49. Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Barr H, Freeth D, Koppel I, et al. The effectiveness of interprofessional education: key findings from a new systematic review. J Interprof Care 2010;24:230–41.10.3109/13561820903163405Search in Google Scholar PubMed
50. Hood K, Cant R, Baulch J, Gilbee A, Leech M, Anderson A, et al. Prior experience of interprofessional learning enhances undergraduate nursing and healthcare students’ professional identity and attitudes to teamwork. Nurse Educ Pract 2014;14:117–22.10.1016/j.nepr.2013.07.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed
51. Hind M, Norman I, Cooper S, Gill E, Hilton R, Judd P, et al. Interprofessional perceptions of health care students. J Interprof Care 2003,17:21–34.10.1080/1356182021000044120Search in Google Scholar PubMed
52. Pollard KC, Miers M. From students to professionals: results of a longitudinal study of attitudes to pre-qualify collaborative learning and working in health and social care in the United Kingdom. J Interprof Care 2008;22:399–416.10.1080/13561820802190483Search in Google Scholar PubMed
53. Templeman K, Robinson A, McKenna L. Complementary medicines in medicine: conceptualising terminology among Australian medical students using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2015;21:33–41.10.1016/j.ctcp.2015.01.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2016 by De Gruyter
