Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter September 11, 2019

Schur multipliers of special 𝑝-groups of rank 2

  • Sumana Hatui EMAIL logo
From the journal Journal of Group Theory

Abstract

Let G be a special p-group with center of order p2. Berkovich and Janko asked to find the Schur multiplier of G in [Y. Berkovich and Z. Janko, Groups of Prime Power Order. Volume 3, De Gruyter Exp. Math. 56, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2011; Problem 2027]. In this article, we answer this question by explicitly computing the Schur multiplier of these groups.

1 Introduction

Let G be a finite p-group, and let d⁒(G) denote the cardinality of a minimal generating set of G. The commutator subgroup and center of G are denoted by Gβ€² and Z⁑(G) respectively. By ESpk⁒(pn), we denote the extraspecial p-group of order pn of exponent pk, and by β„€pk, we denote the elementary abelian p-group of rank k for kβ‰₯1. For p=2, there are two extraspecial p-groups of order 8 up to isomorphism, both of exponent 4; one is the quaternion group Q8 which has trivial Schur multiplier and the other is the dihedral group D8 which has Schur multiplier of order 2.

A finite p-group G is called a special p-group of rank k if Gβ€²=Z⁑(G) is elementary abelian of order pk and G/Gβ€² is elementary abelian. A group G is called a capable group if there exists a group H such that Gβ‰…H/Z⁑(H). We denote the epicenter of a group G by Z*⁒(G), which is the smallest central subgroup K of G such that G/K is capable.

The Schur multiplier of a group G, denoted by M⁑(G), is the second homology group H2⁑(G,β„€), which was introduced by Schur in his work studying projective representations of groups. The special p-groups of minimum rank are the extraspecial p-groups, and their Schur multiplier was studied in [3]. The Schur multiplier of special p-groups having maximum rank was studied in [12]. In this article, we determine the Schur multiplier of special p-groups of rank 2, giving an answer to the question that was asked by Berkovich and Janko in [1, Problem 2027].

We state our main results now. The following result describes the Schur multiplier of G when Gp=Gβ€².

Theorem 1.1.

Let G be a special p-group of rank 2 with d=d⁒(G) and Gp=Gβ€². Then the following assertions hold:

  1. Either Z*⁒(G)=Z⁑(G) or G is capable.

  2. M⁑(G) is elementary abelian of order p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2 iff Z*⁒(G)=Z⁑(G).

  3. M⁑(G) is of order p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-1 and exponent at most p2 iff G is capable.

  4. For every central subgroup Z of order p, G/Z is isomorphic to

    ESp2(p2⁒m+1)Γ—β„€pd-2⁒m (mβ‰₯2),ESp2⁒(p3)Γ—β„€pd-2β€ƒπ‘œπ‘Ÿβ€ƒQ8Γ—β„€2d-2.

By [5, Proposition 3] and Theorem 1.1, we have the immediate corollary.

Corollary 1.2.

If G is a special p-group of rank 2 of order pn (nβ‰₯8) with Gp=Gβ€², then M⁑(G) is elementary abelian of order p12⁒(n-2)⁒(n-3)-2.

The following result describes the Schur multiplier of G when Gp is cyclic of prime order.

Theorem 1.3.

If G is a special p-group of rank 2 with d=d⁒(G) and Gpβ‰…Zp, then the following assertions hold:

  1. G is not capable, and either Z*⁒(G)=Z⁑(G) or Z*⁒(G)=Gp.

  2. M⁑(G) is elementary abelian.

  3. The following are equivalent:

    1. M⁑(G) is of order p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2.

    2. Z*⁒(G)=Z⁑(G).

    3. G/Gpβ‰…ESp⁒(p2⁒m+1)Γ—β„€pd-2⁒m, mβ‰₯2.

  4. The following are equivalent:

    1. M⁑(G) is of order p12⁒d⁒(d-1).

    2. Z*⁒(G)=Gp.

    3. G/Gpβ‰…ESp⁒(p3)Γ—β„€pd-2.

Now we are left only one case when Gp is trivial.

Theorem 1.4.

If G is a special p-group of rank 2 with d=d⁒(G) and Gp=1, p odd, then the following assertions hold:

  1. M⁑(G) is elementary abelian.

  2. p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2≀|M⁑(G)|≀p12⁒d⁒(d-1)+3.

  3. G is capable if and only if G is isomorphic to one of the following groups:

    Ξ¦4⁒(15)=γ€ˆΞ±,Ξ±1,Ξ±2,Ξ²1,Ξ²2∣⁒[Ξ±i,Ξ±]=Ξ²i,Ξ±p=Ξ±ip=Ξ²ip=1(i=1,2)〉,
    Ξ¦12⁒(16)=ESp⁒(p3)Γ—ESp⁒(p3),
    Ξ¦13⁒(16)=γ€ˆΞ±1,Ξ±2,Ξ±3,Ξ±4,Ξ²1,Ξ²2∣⁒[Ξ±i,Ξ±i+1]=Ξ²i,[Ξ±2,Ξ±4]=Ξ²2,Ξ±ip=Ξ±3p=Ξ±4p=Ξ²ip=1(i=1,2)〉,
    Ξ¦15⁒(16)=γ€ˆΞ±1,Ξ±2,Ξ±3,Ξ±4,Ξ²1,Ξ²2∣⁒[Ξ±i,Ξ±i+1]=Ξ²i,[Ξ±3,Ξ±4]=Ξ²1,
      [Ξ±2,Ξ±4]=Ξ²2g,Ξ±ip=Ξ±3p=Ξ±4p=Ξ²ip=1(i=1,2)〉,
    β€ƒβ€ƒβ’π‘€β„Žπ‘’π‘Ÿπ‘’β’g⁒is non-quadratic residue modulo⁒p,
    T=γ€ˆx1,…,x5,c1,c2∣⁒[x2,x1]=[x5,x3]=c1,[x3,x1]=[x5,x4]=c2,xip=cjp=1,1≀i≀5, 1≀j≀2〉.

  4. |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)+3 if and only if G is isomorphic to Φ4⁒(15).

  5. |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)+2 if and only if G is isomorphic to Φ12⁒(16), Φ13⁒(16) or Φ15⁒(16).

  6. |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-1 if and only if G is isomorphic to T.

  7. M⁑(G) is of order p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2 if and only if Z*⁒(G)=Z⁑(G). In this case, G/Zβ‰…ESp⁒(p2⁒m+1)Γ—β„€pd-2⁒m, mβ‰₯2, for every central subgroup Z of order p.

  8. M⁑(G) is of order p12⁒d⁒(d-1) if and only if Z*⁒(G)β‰…β„€p. In this case,

    G/Z*⁒(G)β‰…ESp⁒(p3)Γ—β„€pd-2.

The following result is for p=2.

Theorem 1.5.

Let G be a special 2-group of rank 2. Then G2=Gβ€² holds.

2 Preliminaries

For a finite group G of class 2 with G/Gβ€² elementary abelian, the following construction is given in [3]. We consider G/Gβ€² and Gβ€² as vector spaces over 𝔽p, which we denote by V,W respectively. The bilinear map (-,-):VΓ—Vβ†’W is defined by (v1,v2)=[g1,g2] for v1,v2∈V such that vi=gi⁒Gβ€²,i∈{1,2} for some g1,g2∈G. Let X1 be the subspace of VβŠ—W spanned by all

v1βŠ—(v2,v3)+v2βŠ—(v3,v1)+v3βŠ—(v1,v2)

for v1,v2,v3∈V. Consider a map f:Vβ†’W given by f⁒(g⁒Gβ€²)=gp for g∈G. Let X2 be the subspace spanned by all vβŠ—f⁒(v), v∈V, and take X:=X1+X2. Now consider a homomorphism Οƒ:V∧Vβ†’(VβŠ—W)/X given by

Οƒ(v1∧v2)=(v1βŠ—f(v2)+(2p)v2βŠ—(v1,v2))+X.

There exists an abelian group M* with a subgroup N isomorphic to (VβŠ—W)/X, such that

1β†’Nβ†’M*β’β†’πœ‰β’V∧Vβ†’1

is exact and

σ⁒ξ⁒(Ξ±)=Ξ±p for⁒α∈M*.

Now we consider a homomorphism ρ:V∧Vβ†’W given by

ρ⁒(v1∧v2)=(v1,v2)

for all v1,v2∈V. Notice that ρ is an epimorphism. We let M be the subgroup of M* containing N such that M/Nβ‰…Ker⁑ρ. We use this notation throughout the paper without further reference.

With the above setting, we have the following theorem.

Theorem 2.1 ([3, Theorem 3.1]).

M⁑(G)β‰…M.

Note.

It is easy to observe that X1 is generated by the set

{xΒ―1βŠ—[x2,x3]+xΒ―2βŠ—[x3,x1]+xΒ―3βŠ—[x1.x2]∣x1,x2,x3∈S},

where S is a set of generators of G and xΒ― is the image of x in G/Gβ€².

Suppose G has a free presentation F/R. Let Z=S/R be a central subgroup of G. Then the map from (F/F′⁒R)Γ—(S/R) to (Fβ€²βˆ©R)/[F,R] defined by

(x⁒F′⁒R,s⁒R)↦[x,s]⁒[F,R]

is a well-defined bilinear map and induces a homomorphism

Ξ»Z:(G/Gβ€²)βŠ—Zβ†’M⁑(G),

called the Ganea map.

Theorem 2.2 ([4]).

Let Z be a central subgroup of a finite group G. Then the following sequence is exact:

(G/Gβ€²)βŠ—Z⁒⟢λZ⁒M⁑(G)β’βŸΆπœ‡β’M⁑(G/Z)⟢Gβ€²βˆ©Z⟢1.

Theorem 2.3 ([2]).

Let Z be a central subgroup of a finite group G. Then we have ZβŠ†Z*⁒(G) if and only if (G/Gβ€²)βŠ—Z=Ker⁑λZ.

By [8, Corollary 3.2.4], we have X=Ker⁑λZ⁑(G). Hence, by Theorem 2.3, we have the following result.

Lemma 2.4.

Let Z be a central subgroup of a group G of nilpotency class 2. Then ZβŠ†Z*⁒(G) if and only if (G/Gβ€²)βŠ—Z is contained in X.

Let v1,v2,…,vd be the generators of V such that {f⁒(v1),f⁒(v2),…,f⁒(vr)} is a basis of Gp. Then the set

{viβŠ—f(vi),vlβŠ—f(vi),(viβŠ—f(vj)+vjβŠ—f(vi))∣1≀i<j≀r,(r+1)≀l≀d}

forms a basis of X2, from which the following result follows.

Proposition 2.5 ([12, Proposition 3.3]).

Let G be a special p-group, d=d⁒(G), and Gp of order r. Then |X2|=pr⁒d-12⁒r⁒(r-1).

By Theorem 2.2, we have

(2.1)|M⁑(G)||Im⁑λZ|=|M⁑(G/Z)||Gβ€²βˆ©Z|.

As X=Ker⁑λZ⁑(G), so |Im⁑λZ⁑(G)|=p2⁒d|X|. Hence, by (2.1), taking Z=Z⁑(G), we have

(2.2)|M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2.p2⁒d|X|

Now we recall the following results which will be used in the proof of the main results.

Theorem 2.6 ([9, Main Theorem]).

Let G be a p-group of order pn. Then we have |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒(n-1)⁒(n-2)+1 if and only if Gβ‰…ESp⁒(p3)Γ—Zpn-3.

Theorem 2.7 ([10, Theorem 21]).

Let G be a p-group of order pn. Then we have |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒(n-1)⁒(n-2) if and only if G is isomorphic to one of the following groups:

  1. G≅℀p2×℀pn-2,

  2. G≅D8×℀2n-3,

  3. Gβ‰…β„€p4β‹Šβ„€p (pβ‰ 2).

Theorem 2.8 ([11, Theorem 11]).

Let G be a group of order pn such that G/Gβ€² is elementary abelian of order pn-1. Then |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒(n-1)⁒(n-2)-1 if and only if G is isomorphic to one of the following groups:

  1. ESp2⁒(p3)Γ—β„€pn-3,

  2. Q8Γ—β„€2n-3,

  3. ES⁒(p2⁒m+1)Γ—β„€pn-2⁒m-1 (mβ‰₯2).

3 Proofs

In this section, we prove our main results.

Proof of Theorem 1.1.

Consider Gp=Gβ€²β‰…β„€pΓ—β„€p. Now, by Proposition 2.5, |X2|=p2⁒d-1. Let v1,v2∈V such that {f⁒(v1),f⁒(v2)} is a basis of W. Observe that X2 is generated by the set

{viβŠ—f⁒(vi),vjβŠ—f⁒(vi),(v1βŠ—f⁒(v2)+v2βŠ—f⁒(v1))∣i=1,2⁒and⁒ 3≀j≀d}.

Hence p2⁒dβ‰₯|X|β‰₯p2⁒d-1, and by (2.2),

p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2≀|M⁑(G)|≀p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-1.

(a) Observe that |X|=p2⁒d, i.e., the set {v1βŠ—f⁒(v2),v2βŠ—f⁒(v1)} is contained in X if and only if Z*⁒(G)=Z⁑(G), follows by Lemma 2.4. Another possibility is |X|=p2⁒d-1, i.e., X1βŠ†X2 if and only if v1βŠ—f⁒(v2),v2βŠ—f⁒(v1) are not in X. Hence, by Lemma 2.4, Z*⁒(G)=1. So G is capable.

(b) By (2.2), |X|=p2⁒d if and only if

|M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2.

By Theorem 2.3 and Theorem 2.2, taking Z=Z⁑(G), we see that M⁑(G) embeds in M⁑(G/Z⁑(G)) which is elementary abelian. So, in this case, M⁑(G) is elementary abelian.

(c) For x∈M⁑(G), xp∈(VβŠ—W)/X and VβŠ—W/X is elementary abelian, so xp2=1.

By (2.2), X1βŠ†X2 i.e., |X|=p2⁒d-1 if and only if, by (2.2),

|M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-1.

Hence, by Lemma 2.4, Z*⁒(G)=1, so G is capable. The converse follows from (b).

(d) Observe that, in both the cases, |M⁑(G/Z)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-1 follows from (2.1), taking Z a central subgroup of order p. Therefore, by Theorem 2.8,

G/Zβ‰…ESp2(p2⁒m+1)Γ—β„€pd-2⁒m (mβ‰₯2),ESp2⁒(p3)Γ—β„€pd-2 or Q8Γ—β„€2d-2.∎

Proof of Theorem 1.3.

(a) Assume Gp is cyclic of order p. Now, by Proposition 2.5, |X2|=pd. Let v1∈V such that Gp=γ€ˆf⁒(v1)〉. Observe that X2 is generated by the set

Mβ€²:={viβŠ—f(v1), 1≀i≀d}.

Hence, by Lemma 2.4, GpβŠ†Z*⁒(G). Hence G is not capable with Z*⁒(G)=Gp or Z*⁒(G)=Z⁑(G).

Using Theorem 2.3 and taking Z=Gp in (2.1), we have

(3.1)|M⁑(G)|=|M⁑(G/Gp)|p

Now let v1,v2∈V such that (v1,v2)∈Gβ€²βˆ–Gp. Then the set

Nβ€²:={viβŠ—(v1,v2)+v1βŠ—(v2,vi)+v2βŠ—(vi,v1)∣3≀i≀d}

is linearly independent in X1, so |X1|β‰₯pd-2. The set Mβ€²βˆͺNβ€² is linearly independent in X and Mβ€²βˆ©Nβ€²=βˆ…. Thus

p2⁒dβ‰₯|X|β‰₯p2⁒d-2.

Hence, by (2.2),

p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2≀|M⁑(G)|≀p12⁒d⁒(d-1).

(c) Now similarly, as described in the proof of Theorem 1.1, Z*⁒(G)=Z⁑(G) if and only if |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2, i.e., by (3.1),

|M⁑(G/Gp)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-1,

which happens if and only if

G/Gpβ‰…ESp⁒(p2⁒m+1)Γ—β„€pd-2⁒m,mβ‰₯2,

follows from Theorem 2.8.

(d) By Theorem 2.7, it follows that there is no G/Gp such that

|M⁑(G/Gp)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1).

Thus, by (3.1), |M⁑(G)| cannot be of order p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-1. Hence

|M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)

if and only if Z*⁒(G)=Gp. By (3.1),

|M⁑(G/Gp)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)+1,

which happens if and only if

G/Gpβ‰…ESp⁒(p3)Γ—β„€pd-2,

follows by Theorem 2.6.

(b) By (c) and (d), it follows that p must be odd. The group G/Gp is of exponent p and p odd, so the homomorphism Οƒ, described in Section 2, is the trivial map, and therefore σ⁒ξ⁒(x)=xp=1 for x∈M⁑(G/Gp). Thus M⁑(G/Gp) is elementary abelian. Since GpβŠ†Z*⁒(G), by Theorem 2.3 and Theorem 2.2, M⁑(G) embeds in M⁑(G/Gp). Therefore, M⁑(G) is also elementary abelian. The proof is complete now. ∎

Proof of Theorem 1.4.

(a) Since p is odd and Gp=1, the homomorphism Οƒ, described in Section 2, is the trivial map, and therefore σ⁒ξ⁒(x)=xp=1. Thus M⁑(G) is elementary abelian.

Let z,zβ€² be the generators of Z⁑(G), and let x1,x2,…,xd be the generators of G such that [x1,x2]βˆˆγ€ˆz〉 is non-trivial. Then the set

A:={xiβŠ—[x1,x2]+x1βŠ—[x2,xi]+x2βŠ—[xi,x1]∣3≀i≀d}

consists of d-2 linearly independent elements of X1.

Now if, for some xk∈{3,4,…,d}, [x1,xk]βˆˆγ€ˆz′〉 is non-trivial, then the set

B:={xiβŠ—[x1,xk]+x1βŠ—[xk,xi]+xkβŠ—[xi,x1]∣3≀i≀d,iβ‰ k}

consists of d-3 linearly independent elements of X1. Thus AβˆͺB consists of (2⁒d-5) linearly independent elements of X1.

If we have 1β‰ [x2,xk]βˆˆγ€ˆz′〉 for some k∈{3,4,…,d}, then a similar conclusion holds. Suppose then that [x1,xk] and [x2,xk] are all trivial or in γ€ˆz〉 for all k∈{3,4,…,d}. Say, [x3,x4]βˆˆγ€ˆz′〉. In this case,

B1:={xiβŠ—[x3,x4]+x3βŠ—[x4,xi]+x4βŠ—[xi,x3]∣1≀i≀d,iβ‰ 3,4}

consists of d-2 independent elements of X1. Thus AβˆͺB1 consists of 2⁒d-4 linearly independent elements of X1.

Hence, in both cases, 2⁒dβ‰₯|X|=|X1|β‰₯p2⁒d-5 holds. By (2.2), it follows that

p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2≀|M⁑(G)|≀p12⁒d⁒(d-1)+3,

which proves (b).

Now if G is not capable, then, by (2.1) and [9, Main Theorem], we have

p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2≀|M⁑(G)|=|M⁑(G/Z)|p≀p12⁒d⁒(d-1) for⁒ZβŠ†Z*⁒(G),Zβ‰…β„€p.

By Theorem 2.7, there is no G and central subgroup Z such that

|M⁑(G/Z)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1).

Hence

(3.2)|M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2 or p12⁒d⁒(d-1) if⁒G⁒is not capable.

Assume then that G is capable. By [5, Proposition 3], p5≀|G|≀p7, with p odd. If |G|=p5, then, looking through the list of groups given in [7], it follows that Gβ‰…Ξ¦4⁒(15). Since |X|=p, it follows by (2.2) that

|M⁑(G)|=p6=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)+3.

If |G|=p6, then, looking through the list of groups given in [7], it follows that Gβ‰…Ξ¦12⁒(16), Ξ¦13⁒(16) or Ξ¦15⁒(16). Since |X|=p4, it follows by (2.2) that |M⁑(G)|=p8=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)+2.

Now consider groups of order p7 of exponent p. By [6], it follows that there is only one capable group

G=γ€ˆx1,…,x5,c1,c2∣[x2,x1]=[x5,x3]=c1,[x3,x1]=[x5,x4]=c2,xip=cjp=1, 1≀i≀5, 1≀j≀2〉

up to isomorphism. By (2.2), |M⁑(G)|=p9=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-1.

Now (c), (d), (e), (f) follow by (3.2).

(g) By (2.1), we have Z*⁒(G)β‰…Z⁑(G) if and only if |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2, taking Z=Z⁑(G). Hence, by (2.1), we have that, for every central subgroup Z of order p, |M⁑(G/Z)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-1, and thus

G/Zβ‰…ESp⁒(p2⁒m+1)Γ—β„€pd-2⁒m,mβ‰₯2,

follows from Theorem 2.8.

(h) Suppose Z*⁒(G)β‰…β„€p. By (3.2) and (g), it follows that |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1).

Conversely, suppose |M⁑(G)|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1). From the previous cases, it follows that G is not capable since Z*⁒(G)β‰…β„€p.

In this case, we have

|M⁑(G)|=|M⁑(G/Z*⁒(G))|p.

By Theorem 2.6, it follows that |M⁑(G/Z*⁒(G))|=p12⁒d⁒(d-1)+1 if and only if

G/Z*⁒(G)β‰…ESp⁒(p3)Γ—β„€pd-2.

The proof is complete now. ∎

Proof of Theorem 1.5.

By Theorem 1.3, it follows that there is no special 2-group of rank 2 with G2β‰…β„€2.

Assume that p=2. As in the proof of Theorem 1.4, we conclude that

p12⁒d⁒(d-1)-2≀|M⁑(G)|≀p12⁒d⁒(d-1)+3.

Let Z be a central subgroup of order 2. If G is not capable, then, by (2.1),

212⁒d⁒(d-1)-2≀|M⁑(G)|=|M⁑(G/Z)|2≀212⁒d⁒(d-1) for⁒ZβŠ†Z*⁒(G).

By Theorems 2.6, 2.7 and 2.8, there is no group G and central subgroup Z such that G/Z of exponent 2 and 212⁒d⁒(d-1)-1≀|M⁑(G/Z)|≀212⁒d⁒(d-1)+1. Hence G must be capable, and |M⁑(G/Z)|≀212⁒d⁒(d-1)-2.

Suppose |M⁑(G)|=212⁒d⁒(d-1)-2+k, 0≀k≀5. Then, by (2.2),

|Ker⁑λZ⁑(G)|=|X|=22⁒d-k.

Hence 1≀|Im⁑λZ|=2m≀2k. By (2.1), it follows that

212⁒d⁒(d-1)-2+k-m=|M⁑(G)||Im⁑λZ|=|M⁑(G/Z)|2≀212⁒d⁒(d-1)-3.

Hence k-m≀-1, which is not possible. So there is no special 2-group of rank 2 with G2=1. The proof is complete now. ∎


Communicated by Christopher W. Parker


Funding statement: The research of the author is partly supported by Infosys grant.

References

[1] Y. Berkovich and Z. Janko, Groups of Prime Power Order. Volume 3, De Gruyter Exp. Math. 56, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[2] F. R. Beyl, U. Felgner and P. Schmid, On groups occurring as center factor groups, J. Algebra 61 (1979), no. 1, 161–177. 10.1016/0021-8693(79)90311-9Search in Google Scholar

[3] N. Blackburn and L. Evens, Schur multipliers of p-groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. 309 (1979), 100–113. 10.1515/crll.1979.309.100Search in Google Scholar

[4] T. Ganea, Homologie et extensions centrales de groupes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris SΓ©r. A-B 266 (1968), A556–A558. Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. Heineken, Nilpotent groups of class two that can appear as central quotient groups, Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Padova 84 (1990), 241–248. Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. Heineken, L. C. Kappe and R. F. Morse, On the classification of special p-groups of rank two that appear as central quotient groups, preprint. Search in Google Scholar

[7] R. James, The groups of order p6 (p an odd prime), Math. Comp. 34 (1980), no. 150, 613–637. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0559207-0Search in Google Scholar

[8] G. Karpilovsky, The Schur Multiplier, London Math. Soc. Monogr. (N. S.) 2, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1987. Search in Google Scholar

[9] P. Niroomand, On the order of Schur multiplier of non-abelian p-groups, J. Algebra 322 (2009), no. 12, 4479–4482. 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2009.09.030Search in Google Scholar

[10] P. Niroomand, A note on the Schur multiplier of groups of prime power order, Ric. Mat. 61 (2012), no. 2, 341–346. 10.1007/s11587-012-0134-4Search in Google Scholar

[11] P. Niroomand, Classifying p-groups by their Schur multipliers, Math. Rep. (Bucur.) 20(70) (2018), no. 3, 279–284. Search in Google Scholar

[12] P. K. Rai, On the Schur multiplier of special p-groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 222 (2018), no. 2, 316–322. 10.1016/j.jpaa.2017.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-03-07
Revised: 2019-08-06
Published Online: 2019-09-11
Published in Print: 2020-01-01

Β© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 9.12.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2019-0045/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button