Abstract
We consider the coset poset associated with the families of proper subgroups, proper subgroups of finite index and proper normal subgroups of finite index. We investigate under which conditions those coset posets have contractible geometric realizations.
Funding source: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Award Identifier / Grant number: SPP 2026
Award Identifier / Grant number: SFB 878
Funding statement: Financial support by the DFG through the programs SPP 2026 and SFB 878 is gratefully acknowledged.
A Appendix: The coset nerve for proper normal subgroups in a finite group
In this appendix, we consider the family
of proper normal subgroups of G.
Let
Theorem 20.
If G is finite,
Proof.
If the group G is trivial, the family of proper normal subgroups is empty. Hence, we assume that G is nontrivial.
The family
Inducting on the complexity of G, we shall show that
Claim 21.
If G is simple,
Now assume that G is not simple.
Let
Claim 22.
Assume that G contains no proper normal subgroup that surjects onto the quotient
is a homotopy equivalence.
Thus, sphericity and non-contractibility of
To see this, consider the intersection-closed family
It remains to deal with the case that there is a proper normal subgroup
We consider the following families:
Note that
Now consider a large normal subgroup
Claim 23.
If L is a large proper normal subgroup of G, then
Consequently, all large proper normal subgroups have the same cardinality. Thus, they are mutually incomparable with respect to inclusion.
We now see the structure of the coset poset
The vertices from
Claim 24.
The link of a large vertex gL is isomorphic to
This just follows from the fact that a coset gN is contained in gL if and only if
Now we build
Claim 25.
Assume that there is a proper normal subgroup
Note that the theorem follows by induction from Claims 21, 22, and 25. ∎
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Russ Woodroofe for suggesting that a proof of Theorem 20 could be carried out using ideas from Brown [2] rather than following the much steeper path of Shareshian–Woodroofe [4]. We also thank Benjamin Brück, Linus Kramer and Russ Woodroofe for helpful comments on a preliminary version of this paper.
References
[1] H. Abels and S. Holz, Higher generation by subgroups, J. Algebra 160 (1993), 310–341. 10.1006/jabr.1993.1190Search in Google Scholar
[2] K. S. Brown, The coset poset and probabilistic zeta function of a finite group, J. Algebra 255 (2000), 989–1012. 10.1006/jabr.1999.8221Search in Google Scholar
[3] D. A. Ramras, Connectivity of the coset poset and the subgroup poset of a group, J. Group Theory 8 (2005), 719–746. 10.1515/jgth.2005.8.6.719Search in Google Scholar
[4] J. Shareshian and R. Woodroofe, Order complexes of coset posets of finite groups are not contractible, Adv. Math. 291 (2016), 758–773. 10.1016/j.aim.2015.10.018Search in Google Scholar
[5] C. Welsch, On coset posets, nerve complexes and subgroup graphs of finitely generated groups, PhD Thesis, Münster, 2018. Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston