Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 21, 2021

Isomorphism classification of Leary–Minasyan groups

  • Motiejus Valiunas EMAIL logo
From the journal Journal of Group Theory

Abstract

Recently, I. J. Leary and A. Minasyan [Commensurating HNN extensions: Nonpositive curvature and biautomaticity, Geom. Topol. 25 (2021), 4, 1819–1860] studied the class of groups G ( A , L ) defined as commensurating HNN-extensions of Z n . This class, containing the class of Baumslag–Solitar groups, also includes other groups with curious properties, such as being CAT(0) but not biautomatic. In this paper, we classify the groups G ( A , L ) up to isomorphism.

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Ian Leary and Ashot Minasyan for useful comments, and the referee for their careful reading of the paper and valuable feedback.

  1. Communicated by: Alexander Olshanskii

References

[1] G. Baumslag and D. Solitar, Some two-generator one-relator non-Hopfian groups, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1962), 199–201. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1962-10745-9Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. J. Collins and F. Levin, Automorphisms and Hopficity of certain Baumslag–Solitar groups, Arch. Math. (Basel) 40 (1983), no. 5, 385–400. 10.1007/BF01192801Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. Culler and J. W. Morgan, Group actions on ℝ-trees, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 55 (1987), no. 3, 571–604. 10.1112/plms/s3-55.3.571Search in Google Scholar

[4] D. S. Dummit and R. M. Foote, Abstract Algebra, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

[5] M. Forester, Deformation and rigidity of simplicial group actions on trees, Geom. Topol. 6 (2002), 219–267. 10.2140/gt.2002.6.219Search in Google Scholar

[6] C. G. Latimer and C. C. MacDuffee, A correspondence between classes of ideals and classes of matrices, Ann. of Math. (2) 34 (1933), no. 2, 313–316. 10.2307/1968204Search in Google Scholar

[7] I. J. Leary and A. Minasyan, Commensurating HNN extensions: Nonpositive curvature and biautomaticity, Geom. Topol. 25 (2021), no. 4, 1819–1860. 10.2140/gt.2021.25.1819Search in Google Scholar

[8] S. Meskin, Nonresidually finite one-relator groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 164 (1972), 105–114. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1972-0285589-5Search in Google Scholar

[9] D. I. Moldavanskiĭ, On the isomorphisms of Baumslag–Solitar groups, Ukrain. Math. J. 43 (1991), 1569–1571. 10.1007/BF01066696Search in Google Scholar

[10] R. Schoof, Minus class groups of the fields of the 𝑙th roots of unity, Math. Comp. 67 (1998), no. 223, 1225–1245. 10.1090/S0025-5718-98-00939-9Search in Google Scholar

[11] D. Segal, Polycyclic Groups, Cambridge Tracts in Math. 82, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1983. 10.1017/CBO9780511565953Search in Google Scholar

[12] J.-P. Serre, Trees, Springer, Berlin, 1980. 10.1007/978-3-642-61856-7Search in Google Scholar

[13] L. C. Washington, Introduction to Cyclotomic Fields, Grad. Texts in Math. 83, Springer, New York, 1982. 10.1007/978-1-4684-0133-2Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-10
Revised: 2021-08-05
Published Online: 2021-09-21
Published in Print: 2022-03-01

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jgth-2021-0042/html
Scroll to top button