Abstract
The emergence of COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on human lives as well as economic and social stability. The United States has a complicated history with biosecurity. The September 11th terror attacks uncovered various weaknesses in the national biosecurity infrastructure that have persisted into the current pandemic. This study explores the implications of framing the infectious disease biothreat as a security threat to improve our capabilities while protecting against the potential accelerated threat of bioterrorism in the post-COVID-19 era. To counter the increasing biothreats, the United States must invest in revamping the biodefense infrastructure to increase our resilience to various biothreats.
References
Ackerman, G., and H. Peterson. 2020. “Terrorism and COVID-19: Actual and Potential Impacts.” Perspectives on Terrorism 14 (3): 59–73.Search in Google Scholar
Bacon, J. 2015. “Disease as a Security Threat and the Militarization of the Response.” Countering WMD Journal (12): 26–30.Search in Google Scholar
Caves, J., and W. Carus. 2021. The Future of Weapons of Mass Destruction an Update. National Intelligence University, National Intelligence Press. Also available at https://ni-u.edu/wp/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Future_of_WMD_Final.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Cruickshank, P., and D. Rassler. 2020. A View from the CT Foxhole: A Virtual Roundtable on COVID-19 and Counterterrorism with Audrey Kurth Cronin, Lieutenant General (Ret) Michael Nagata, Magnus Ranstorp, Ali Soufan, and Juan Zarate, vol 13, 1–15. CTC Sentinel. Also available at https://ctc.usma.edu/a-view-from-the-ctfoxhole-a-virtual-roundtable-on-covid-19-and-counterterrorism-with-audrey-kurth-cronin-lieutenant-general-retmichael-nagata-magnus-ranstorp-ali-soufan-and-juan-zarate/.Search in Google Scholar
Enemark, C. 2005. “United States Biodefense, International Law, and the Problem of Intent.” Politics and the Life Sciences 24 (1–2): 32–42. https://doi.org/10.2990/1471-5457(2005)24[32:USBILA]2.0.CO;2.10.1017/S0730938400007577Search in Google Scholar
Jefferson, C., F. Lentzos, and C. Marris. 2014. “Synthetic Biology and Biosecurity: Challenging the “Myths”.” Frontiers in Public Health 2: 115, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00115.Search in Google Scholar
Lederberg, J. 1996. “Infectious Disease—A Threat to Global Health and Security.” JAMA 276 (5): 417–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540050077028.Search in Google Scholar
McInnes, C., and A. Roemer-Mahler. 2017. “From Security to Risk: Reframing Global Health Threats.” International Affairs 93 (6): 1313–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix187.Search in Google Scholar
Morens, D. M., and A. S. Fauci. 2013. “Emerging Infectious Diseases: Threats to Human Health and Global Stability.” PLoS Pathogens 9 (7): e1003467, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003467.Search in Google Scholar
Mueller, S. 2019. “Are Market GM Plants an Unrecognized Platform for Bioterrorism and Biocrime?” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 7: 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00121.Search in Google Scholar
Sandberg, A., and C. Nelson. 2020. “Who Should We Fear More: Biohackers, Disgruntled Postdocs, or Bad Governments? A Simple Risk Chain Model of Biorisk.” Health Security 18 (3): 155–63, https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2019.0115.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, R. 2006. Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World. New York: Penguin Books, Vintage.Search in Google Scholar
Webster, P. C. 2014. “Using Military Resources to Fight Disease.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 186 (9): 660. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4780.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
