Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 29, 2020

Penalty success in professional soccer: a randomised comparison between imagery methodologies

Jonathan Rhodes ORCID logo, Jon May ORCID logo and Alex Booth

Abstract

Objectives

The PETTLEP model is one of the most cited forms of imagery training to enhance sporting performance, but there is limited evidence for its long-term effectiveness and it is often compared to non-imagery controls rather than other imagery techniques. We compared PETTLEP with an imagery-based behavioural change intervention, Functional Imagery Training (FIT), and assessed long-term effectiveness for enhancing professional soccer player’s penalty kick taking.

Methods

Thirty male professional soccer players conducted a group goal setting task, were introduced to imagery, then randomly assigned to three conditions; individual PETTLEP, group-based FIT, or a control. Baseline penalty kick success was measured, then interventions commenced lasting for a week after which, penalties were conducted again. Penalties were conducted for a third time between 15 and 17 weeks after baseline measurements.

Results

There were no differences in baseline scores between conditions on vividness of imagery and penalty kicking. Whilst the control condition did not improve, both imagery conditions improved penalty performance after one week, as did their vividness of imagery scores. However, after 15 weeks, only the FIT for groups condition maintained improvements on penalty scores and PETTLEP returned to baseline.

Conclusions

Imagery is effective in improving penalty kick taking, but PETTLEP does not support long-term change, whereas the motivational approach of FIT does.


Corresponding author: Jonathan Rhodes, School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: Institutional ethical approval was gained after the club gave written consent for their players to be used as potential participants. Each participant from the first team squad gave signed consent to partake after reading a project information sheet.

References

Andrade, J., May, J., & Kavanagh, D. (2012). Sensory imagery in craving: From cognitive psychology to new treatments for addiction. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 3(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.024611. Search in Google Scholar

Andrade, J., May, J., van Dillen, L., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2015). Elaborated intrusion theory: Explaining the cognitive and motivational basis of desire. In W. Hoffman, & L. F. Nordren (Eds.), The psychology of desire (pp. 17–35). NY: Guilford. Search in Google Scholar

Andrade, J., Khalil, M., Dickson, J., May, J., & Kavanagh, D. J. (2016). Functional Imagery Training to reduce snacking: Testing a novel motivational intervention based on Elaborated Intrusion theory. Appetite, 100, 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.015. Search in Google Scholar

Anuar, N., Cumming, J., & Williams, S. E. (2016). Effects of applying the PETTLEP model on vividness and ease of imaging movement. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 28(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2015.1099122. Search in Google Scholar

Blankert, T., & Hamstra, M. R. (2017). Imagining success: Multiple achievement goals and the effectiveness of imagery. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2016.1255947. Search in Google Scholar

Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(5), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01312-1. Search in Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press. Search in Google Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (GRIT–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290. Search in Google Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087. Search in Google Scholar

Hall, C. R., Mack, D. E., Paivio, A., & Hausenblas, H. A. (1998). Imagery use by athletes: Development of the sport imagery questionnaire. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 29(1), 73–89. Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, P. S., & Collins, D. J. (2001). The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200109339004. Search in Google Scholar

Hossini, R. N. S., Afroozeh, M. S., Vaezmosavi, M., Gerber, M., Puehse, U., & Brand, S. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of a PETTLEP imagery intervention on the football skill performance of Novice athletes. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 14(1). Search in Google Scholar

Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain sciences, 17(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00034026. Search in Google Scholar

Kosslyn, S. M (2005). Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3-4), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000130. Search in Google Scholar

Lang, P. J. (1979). A bio‐informational theory of emotional imagery. Psychophysiology, 16(6), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01511.x. Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, T., & Moran, A. P. (2007). A qualitative investigation of meta-imagery processes and imagery direction among elite athletes. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0191.1022. Search in Google Scholar

Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x. Search in Google Scholar

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Chicago: Guilford press. Search in Google Scholar

Nordin, S. M., & Cumming, J. (2008). Types and functions of athletes’ imagery: Testing predictions from the applied model of imagery use by examining effectiveness. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197x.2008.9671861. Search in Google Scholar

Oettingen, G. (2012). Future thought and behaviour change. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2011.643698. Search in Google Scholar

Paivio, A. (1985). Cognitive and motivational functions of imagery in human performance. Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal Canadien des Sciences Appliquées au Sport, 10(4), 22S–28S. Search in Google Scholar

Pocock, C., Dicks, M., Thelwell, R. C., Chapman, M., & Barker, J. B. (2019). Using an imagery intervention to train visual exploratory activity in elite academy football players. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 31(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2017.1395929. Search in Google Scholar

Quinton, M. L., Veldhuijzen van Zanten, J., Trotman, G. P., Cumming, J., & Williams, S. E. (2019). Investigating the protective role of mastery imagery ability in buffering debilitative stress responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01657. Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/. Search in Google Scholar

Ramsey, R., Cumming, J., Edwards, M. G., Williams, S., & Brunning, C. (2010). Examining the emotion aspect of PETTLEP-based imagery with penalty taking in soccer. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33(3), 295. Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes, J., May, J., Andrade, J., & Kavanagh, D. (2018). Enhancing grit through functional imagery training in professional soccer. The Sport Psychologist, 32(3), 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2017-0093. Search in Google Scholar

Richardson, A. (2020). Individual differences in imaging: Their measurement, origins, and consequences. New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2003). On assimilating identities to the self: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization and integrity within cultures. In M. R. Leary, & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 253–272). New York: The Guilford Press. Search in Google Scholar

Smith, D., Holmes, P. S., Whitemore, L., & Devonport, T. (2001). The effect of theoretically-based imagery scripts on field hockey performance. Journal of Sport Behavior, 24(4), 408–419. Search in Google Scholar

Smith, D., Wright, C. J., Allsopp, A., & Westhead, H. (2007). It’s all in the mind: PETTLEP-based imagery and sports performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200600944132. Search in Google Scholar

Smith, D., Wright, C. J., & Cantwell, C. (2008). Beating the bunker: The effect of PETTLEP imagery on golf bunker shot performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 79(3), 385–391. https://doi.org/10.5641/193250308x13086832906111. Search in Google Scholar

Solbrig, L., Whalley, B., Kavanagh, D. J., May, J., Parkin, T., Jones, R., Andrade, J. (2018). Functional imagery training versus motivational interviewing for weight loss: A randomised controlled trial of brief individual interventions for overweight and obesity. International Journal of Obesity, 43(4), 883. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0122-1. Search in Google Scholar

Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M., … & Marsolais, J. (2003). Les passions de l’ame: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756. Search in Google Scholar

Vealey, R. S., & Greenleaf, C. (2006). Seeing is believing: Understanding and using imagery in sport. In J. M. Williams (Ed.), Applied sport psychology: personal growth to peak performance (pp. 306–348). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Search in Google Scholar

Wakefield, C. J., & Smith, D. (2009). Impact of differing frequencies of PETTLEP imagery on netball shooting performance. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0191.1043. Search in Google Scholar

Wakefield, C. J., Smith, D., Moran, A. P., & Holmes, P. (2013). Functional equivalence or behavioural matching? A critical reflection on 15 years of research using the PETTLEP model of motor imagery. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984x.2012.724437. Search in Google Scholar

Williams, S. E., Cooley, S. J., & Cumming, J. (2013). Layered stimulus response training improves motor imagery ability and movement execution. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 35(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.35.1.60. Search in Google Scholar

Williams, S. E., & Cumming, J. (2011). Measuring athlete imagery ability: The sport imagery ability questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33(3), 416–440. Search in Google Scholar

Wright, C. J., & Smith, D. K. (2007). The effect of a short-term PETTLEP imagery intervention on a cognitive task. Journal of imagery research in sport and physical activity. 2(1), https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0191.1014. Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.29. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-06-18
Accepted: 2020-10-13
Published Online: 2020-10-29

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston