Speech Distribution in Five-Act Tragedies (A Question of Classicism and Romanticism)

References

Byron, George Gordon, Lord, The Works of Lord Byron: Letters and Journals, A New, Revised and Enlarged Edition, with Illustrations, vol. 5, London/New York 1901.Search in Google Scholar

Deutschbein, Max, Das Wesen des Romantischen, Cöthen 1921.Search in Google Scholar

Dollo, Louis, Les lois de l’évolution (Résumé), Bulletin de la Société belge de géologie, de paléontologie & d’hydrologie, vol. 7 (Bruxelles 1893), 164–166.Search in Google Scholar

Ducis, Jean-François, Œuvres, Paris 1818.Search in Google Scholar

Freundorfer, Joseph, Typus, in: Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, 2., neubearbeitete Auflage des kirchlichen Handlexikons, hrsg. von M. Buchberger, Bd. 10: Terziaren–Zytomierz, Freiburg 1938, 345–346.Search in Google Scholar

Galton, Francis, Natural Inheritance, London/New York 1889.10.5962/bhl.title.94409Search in Google Scholar

Kondratiev, Nikolai D., Izbrannyye sochineniya [Selected Works], Moscow 1993.Search in Google Scholar

Korff, Hermann August, Der Geist der Goethezeit, vol. 1, Leipzig 1923.Search in Google Scholar

Lunding, Erik, Literaturwissenschaft, in: Reallexikon der deutschen Literaturgeschichte, vol. 2, Berlin 1965, 195–212.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, Wesley Clair, Business Cycles, Berkeley 1913.10.4324/9781351305525-19Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, Wesley Clair, The Problem and a Summary of the Findings, in: Arthur F. Burns, Production Trends in the United States Since 1870, New York 1934, xi–xxiv.Search in Google Scholar

Osborn, Henry Fairfield, The Origin and Evolution of Life: On the Theory of Action, Reaction and Interaction of Energy, London 1918.10.5962/bhl.title.7397Search in Google Scholar

Petersen, Julius, Die Wesensbestimmung der deutschen Romantik, Leipzig 1926.Search in Google Scholar

Pigenot, Ludwig von, Hölderlin: Das Wesen und die Schau, München 1923.Search in Google Scholar

RGALI – Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv literatury i iskusstva [Russian State Archive of Literature and Art], Moscow.Search in Google Scholar

Rozanov, Ivan, Ritm epokh: Opyt teorii literaturnykh ottalkivaniy [The Rhythm of Epochs: The Experience of the Theory of Literary Repulsions] (1922), Svitok: Al’manakh literaturnogo obshchestva »Nikitinskiye subbotniki« [The Scroll: Almanac of the Literary Society »Nikitinskie subbotniki«] 3, Moscow/Leningrad 1924, 175–195.Search in Google Scholar

Scherer, Wilhelm, Geschichte der deutschen Dichtung im elften und zwölften Jahrhundert, Strassburg/London 1875.10.1515/9783111346984Search in Google Scholar

Scherer, Wilhelm, Geschichte der Deutschen Litteratur, Berlin 1883.Search in Google Scholar

Severtsov, Alexei N., Glavnyye napravleniya evolyutsionnogo protsessa: Morfobiologicheskaya teoriya evolyutsii [Main Directions of the Evolutionary Process: The Morpho-Biological Theory of Evolution], Moscow/Leningrad ²1934.Search in Google Scholar

Shklovsky, Viktor, Rozanov: Iz knigi »Syuzhet kak yavleniye stilya« [Rozanov: From the Book »Syuzhet as the Manifestation of Style«], Petrograd 1921.Search in Google Scholar

Stefansky, Georg, Das Wesen der deutschen Romantik, Stuttgart 1923.Search in Google Scholar

Stendhal, Œuvres complètes, texte établi par G. Eudes, Paris 1954.Search in Google Scholar

Strich, Fritz, Deutsche Klassik und Romantik oder Vollendung und Unendlichkeit. Ein Vergleich, München ³1928.Search in Google Scholar

Tarde, Gabriel, Les Lois de l’imitation: Étude sociologique, Paris 1890.10.2307/1411168Search in Google Scholar

Veresaev, Vikenty V., Arkhilokh, Stikhotvoreniya i fragmenty [Archilochus, Verse and Fragments], transl. from the Greek original by V. Veresaev, Moscow 1915.Search in Google Scholar

Walzel, Oskar, Das Wesen des dichterischen Kunstwerks [1924], in: Das Wortkunstwerk, Leipzig 1926, 100–122.Search in Google Scholar

Wölfflin, Heinrich, Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Das Problem der Stilentwickelung in der neueren Kunst, München 1915.Search in Google Scholar

Yarkho, Boris I., Granitsy nauchnogo literaturovedeniya (okonchaniye) [The Limits of the Scientific Study of Literature (Last Part)], Iskusstvo [Art] 3:1 (1927), 16–38.Search in Google Scholar

Yarkho, Boris I., Organische Struktur des russischen Schnaderhüpfels (Častuška) (Mit Ausblicken auf das deutsche Schnaderhüpfel), Germanoslavica 3:1/2 (1935), 31–64.Search in Google Scholar

Yarkho, Boris I., Metodologiya tochnogo literaturovedeniya. Izbrannyye trudy po teorii literatury [Methodology for the Exact Study of Literature: Selected Works in Literary Theory], ed. by M. V. Akimova, I. A. Pilshchikov and M. I. Shapir under the general editorship of M. I. Shapir, Moscow 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Yarkho, Boris I.: The Elementary Foundations of Formal Analysis, transl., with notes, by Michael Lavery and Igor Pilshchikov, Studia Metrica et Poetica 3:2 (2016), 151–174, DOI: 10.12697/smp.2016.3.2.06.10.12697/smp.2016.3.2.06Search in Google Scholar

Zhirmunsky, Viktor M., Noveyshiye techeniya istoriko-literaturnoy mysli v Germanii [The Latest Trends in Historical and Literary Thought in Germany], Poetika: Vremennik Otdela Slovesnykh Iskusstv Gosudarstvennogo Instituta Istorii Iskusstv [Poetics: Yearbook of the Literary Studies Department of the State Institute for Art History] 2 (Leningrad 1927), 5–28.Search in Google Scholar