Abstract
As changes in gravity are directly related to mass variability, satellite missions observing the Earth’s time varying gravity field are a unique tool for observing mass transport processes in the Earth system, such as the water cycle, rapid changes in the cryosphere, oceans, and solid Earth processes, on a global scale. The observation of Earth’s gravity field was successfully performed by the GRACE and GOCE satellite missions, and will be continued by the GRACE Follow-On mission. A comprehensive team of European scientists proposed the next-generation gravity field mission MOBILE in response to the European Space Agency (ESA) call for a Core Mission in the frame of Earth Explorer 10 (EE10). MOBILE is based on the innovative observational concept of a high-low tracking formation with micrometer ranging accuracy, complemented by new instrument concepts. Since a high-low tracking mission primarily observes the radial component of gravity-induced orbit perturbations, the error structure is close to isotropic. This geometry significantly reduces artefacts of previous along-track ranging low-low formations (GRACE, GRACE-Follow-On) such as the typical striping patterns. The minimum configuration consists of at least two medium-Earth orbiters (MEOs) at 10000 km altitude or higher, and one low-Earth orbiter (LEO) at 350-400 km. The main instrument is a laser-based distance or distance change measurement system, which is placed at the LEO. The MEOs are equipped either with passive reflectors or transponders. In a numerical closed-loop simulation, it was demonstrated that this minimum configuration is in agreement with the threshold science requirements of 5 mm equivalent water height (EWH) accuracy at 400 km wavelength, and 10 cm EWH at 200 km. MOBILE provides promising potential future perspectives by linking the concept to existing space infrastructure such as Galileo next-generation, as future element of the Copernicus/Sentinel programme, and holds the potential of miniaturization even up to swarm configurations. As such MOBILE can be considered as a precursor and role model for a sustained mass transport observing system from space.
References
Bender P.L., Wiese D.N. and Nerem R.S., 2008, A possible Dual-GRACE mission with 90 degree and 63 degree inclination orbits, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Formation Flying, Missions and Technologies. European Space Agency Symposium Proceedings, SP-654 jILA Pub. 8161, Noordwijk, NetherlandsSearch in Google Scholar
Biancale R. et al., 2017, E-GRASP/Eratosthenes, Proposal for Earth Explorer Opportunity Mission EE-9 in response to the Call for Proposals for Earth Explorer Opportunity Mission EE-9 (ESA/EXPLORER/EE-9 rev. 1), June 2017Search in Google Scholar
Carraz O., Siemes, C. Massotti L., Haagmans R. and Silvestrin P., 2014, A Spaceborne Gravity Gradiometer Concept Based on Cold Atom Interferometers for Measuring Earth’s Gravity Field, Microgravity Science and Technology, 26(3), 139–145, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12217-014-9385-x10.1007/s12217-014-9385-xSearch in Google Scholar
Daras I. and Pail R., 2017, Treatment of temporal aliasing effects in the context of next generation satellite gravimetry missions, J. Geophys. Res: Solid Earth, 122(9), 7343–7362, DOI: 10.1002/2017JB01425010.1002/2017JB014250Search in Google Scholar
Daras I., Pail R., Murböck M. and Yi W., 2015, Gravity field processing with enhanced numerical precision for LL-SST missions, J. Geod., 89, 99-110, DOI: 10.1007/s00190-014-0764-210.1007/s00190-014-0764-2Search in Google Scholar
Dobslaw H., Bergmann-Wolf I., Dill R., Forootan E., Klemann V., Kusche J. and Sasgen I., 2014, Updating ESA’s Earth System Model for Gravity Mission Simulation Studies: 1. Model Description and Validation, GFZ„ 69 p., DOI: http://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-1407910.2312/GFZ.b103-14079Search in Google Scholar
Drinkwater M.R., Floberghagen R., Haagmans R., Muzi D. and Popescu A., 2003, GOCE: ESA’s first Earth Explorer Core mission, In: G. Beutler et al. (Eds.): Earth Gravity Field from Space - from Sensors to Earth Science, Space Sciences Series of ISSI (Vol. 18). Dordrecht, Netherlands, 419–432, ISBN:1-4020-1408-210.1023/A:1026104216284Search in Google Scholar
Flechtner, F., Neumayer, K.H., Dahle, C., Dobslaw, H., Güntner, A., Raimondo, J.C. et al., 2016, What can be expected from the GRACE-FO Laser Ranging Interferometer for Earth Science applications?, Surv. Geophys., 37(2), 453-470, DOI: 10.1007/s10712-015-9338-y10.1007/s10712-015-9338-ySearch in Google Scholar
GCOS, 2016, The Global Observing System for Climate: Implementation Plan. Global Climate Observing System, World Meteorological Organization, GCOS-200 (GOOS-214)„ https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/gcos_ip_10oct2016.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Gruber T., Panet I., e.motion2 Team, 2015, Proposal to ESA’s Earth Explorer Call 9: Earth System Mass Transport Mission – e.motion2, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Reihe B, Angewandte Geodäsie, Series B, https://dgk.badw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Files/DGK/docs/b-318.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Guzmán Cervantes F., Kumanchik L., Pratt J. and Taylor J.M., 2014, High sensitivity optomechanical reference accelerometer over 10 kHz, Appl. Phys. Lett., 104, 221111, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.488193610.1063/1.4881936Search in Google Scholar
Hauk M. and Pail R., 2018, Treatment of Ocean Tide Aliasing in the context of a Next Generation Gravity Field Mission, Geophy. J. Int., 214(1), 345–365, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy14510.1093/gji/ggy145Search in Google Scholar
Hauk M., Schlicht A., Pail R. and Murböck M., 2017, Gravity field recovery in the framework of a Geodesy and Time Reference in Space (GETRIS), Adv. Space Res., 59(8), 2032–47, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.02810.1016/j.asr.2017.01.028Search in Google Scholar
IGSWG, NASA/ESA Interagency Gravity Science Working Group, 2016, Towards a sustained observing system for mass transport to understand global change and to benefit society„ Doc. Nr.: TUD-IGSWG-2016-01Search in Google Scholar
IUGG, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, 2015, Resolutions adopted by the council at the XXVI General Assembly Prague, Czech Republic„ 22. June to 2. July 2015Search in Google Scholar
Liu H. and Pike W.T., 2016, A micromachined angular-acceleration sensor for geophysical applications, Appl. Phys. Lett., 109(17), 173506, DOI: 10.1063/1.496654710.1063/1.4966547Search in Google Scholar
Murböck M., Pail R., Daras I. and Gruber T., 2014, Optimal orbits for temporal gravity recovery regarding temporal aliasing, J. Geod., 88(2), 113-126, DOI: 10.1007/s00190-013-0671-y10.1007/s00190-013-0671-ySearch in Google Scholar
Murböck M., Pail R., Daras I. and Gruber T., 2014, Optimal orbits for temporal gravity recovery regarding temporal aliasing, J. Geod., 88(2), 113-126, DOI: 10.1007/s00190-013-0671-y10.1007/s00190-013-0671-ySearch in Google Scholar
NAS - National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018, Thriving on Our Changing Planet: A Decadal Strategy for Earth Observation from Space, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, https://essp.nasa.gov/essp/files/2018/02/2017-Earth-Science-Decadal-Survey.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Pail R. et al., 2015, Observing mass transport to understand global change and benefit society: science and user needs. An international multi-disciplinary initiative for IUGG, Edited by Roland Pail, Deutsche Geodätische Kommission der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften„ Heft 320, ISBN 978-3-7696-8599-2, München, https://www.dgk.badw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Files/DGK/docs/b-320.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Pail R., Bingham R., Braitenberg C., Dobslaw H., Eicker A., Güntner A. et al., 2015, IUGG Expert Panel, Science and user needs for observing global mass transport to understand global change and benefit society, Surv. Geophys., 36(6), 743-772, DOI: 10.1007/s10712-015-9348-910.1007/s10712-015-9348-9Search in Google Scholar
Panet I., Flury J., Biancale R., Gruber T., Johannessen J., van den Broeke M., et al., 2012, Earth System Mass Transport Mission (e.motion): A Concept for future Earth Gravity Field Measurements from Space, Surv. Geophys., 34(2), 141–163, DOI: 10.1007/s10712-012-9209-810.1007/s10712-012-9209-8Search in Google Scholar
Tapley B., Bettadpur S., Watkins M. and Reigber C., 2004, The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31(9), DOI: 10.1029/2004GL01992010.1029/2004GL019920Search in Google Scholar
Wiese D.N., Visser P.N.A.M. and Nerem R.S., 2011, Estimating low resolution gravity fields at short time intervals to reduce temporal aliasing errors, Adv. Space Res., 48, 1094–1107, DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2011.05.02710.1016/j.asr.2011.05.027Search in Google Scholar
Zahzam N., Bidel Y., Bresson A., Huynh P.-A., Liorzou F., Lebat V., et al., 2017, Hybrid Atom Electrostatic System for Satellite Geodesy, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 19, EGU2017-14958-1, EGU General Assembly 2017Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 R. Pail et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.
