Abstract
The paper presents a new approach to the airborne vector gravimetry problem. The idea of the approach is to take into account spatial correlation of the gravity field to improve observability of horizontal components of the gravity disturbance vector (GDV). We consider the GDV determination problem given airborne data at a set of parallel survey lines assuming that lines are flown in the same direction at a constant height above the reference ellipsoid. We use a 2-D random field model for the gravity field at the flight height. The random field is governed by two autoregressive equations (one in the direction along the lines, the other across the lines). Then we pose the estimation problem simultaneously for the GDV horizontal components and systematic errors of an inertial navigation system at all the lines simultaneously. The developed estimation algorithm is based on 2D Kalman filtering and smoothing techniques. Numerical results obtained from simulated data processing showed improved accuracy of the gravity horizontal component determination.
References
Becker D., Becker M., Olesen A.V., Nielsen J.E. and Forsberg R., 2016, Latest results in strapdown airborne gravimetry using an iMAR RQH unit, In: Proc. of the 4th IAG Symposium on Terrestrial Gravimetry: Static and Mobile Measurements, Consern CSRI Elektropribor, St. Petersburg, 19–25.Search in Google Scholar
Berzhitsky V.N., Bolotin Yu.V., Golovan A.A., Ilyin V.N., Parusnikov N.A., Smoller Y.L. and Yurist S.S, 2002, GT-1A inertial gravimeter system. Results of flight tests, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Moscow, Russia.Search in Google Scholar
Bolotin Yu. V. and Golovan A. A., 2013, Methods of inertial gravimetry, Moscow Univ. Mech. Bull., 68, 5, 117–125.10.3103/S0027133013050026Search in Google Scholar
Bolotin Yu. V. and Vyazmin V. S, 2018, Accuracy analysis of the airborne vector gravimetry algorithm based on two-dimensional random fields for gravity modeling, In: Proc. of the 25th Anniversary Saint Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems. Consern CSRI Elektropribor, St. Petersburg, 179 – 183.10.23919/ICINS.2018.8405872Search in Google Scholar
Cai S., Zhang K. and Wu M., 2013, Improving airborne strapdown vector gravimetry using stabilized horizontal components, J. Appl. Geoph., 98, 79–89.10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.08.004Search in Google Scholar
Childers V. A., Bell R. E. and Brozena J. M., 1999, Airborne gravimetry: An investigation of filtering, Geoph., 64, 1, 61–69.10.1190/1.1444530Search in Google Scholar
Dai D., Wang X., Zhan D. and Huang Z., 2014, An improved method for dynamic measurement of deflections of the vertical based on the maintenance of attitude reference. Sensors, 14, 16322–16342.10.3390/s140916322Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Forsberg R., 1987, A new covariance model for inertial gravimetry and gradiometry, J. Geoph. Res., 92, B2, 1305–1310.10.1029/JB092iB02p01305Search in Google Scholar
Bogdanov O. N. and Golovan A. A., 2017, Application of GNSS-INS simulator for testing algorithms of the airborne vector gravimetry problem, In: Proc. of the 11 th International Conference on Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Aerospace and Sciences, 1798.10.1063/1.4972622Search in Google Scholar
Farrell J. A., 2008, Aided navigation systems: GPS and high rate sensors, New York, NY, McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar
Freda P., Angrisano A., Gaglione S. and Troisi S., 2015, Time-differenced carrier phases technique for precise GNSS velocity estimation, GPS Solut, 19, 2, 335-341.10.1007/s10291-014-0425-1Search in Google Scholar
Huddle J. R., 1983, Inertial navigation system error-model considerations in Kalman filtering applications, Control Dyn. Syst., 20, 293-338.10.1016/B978-0-12-012720-7.50012-7Search in Google Scholar
Jekeli C., 1994, Airborne vector gravimetry using precise, position-aided inertial measurement units, Bull. Geod., 69, 1, 1–11.10.1007/BF00807986Search in Google Scholar
Jordan S. K., 1972, Self-consistent statistical models for the gravity anomaly, vertical deflections, and undulation of the geoid, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 20, 3660 – 3670.10.1029/JB077i020p03660Search in Google Scholar
Kailath T., Sayed A. H. and Hassibi B., 2000, Linear estimation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Search in Google Scholar
Kennedy S.L., Bruton A.M. and Schwarz K.P., 2002, Improving DGPS accelerations for airborne gravimetry: GPS carrier phase accelerations revisited, In: Vistas for Geodesy in the New Millennium, IAG Symposia, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-662-04709-5_35Search in Google Scholar
Kwon J. and Jekeli C., 2001, A new approach for airborne vector gravimetry using GPS/INS, J. Geod., 74, 10, 690–700.10.1007/s001900000130Search in Google Scholar
Lu B., Barthelmes F., Petrovic S., Förste C., Flechtner F., Luo Z. et al., 2017, Airborne gravimetry of GEOHALO mission: data processing and gravity field modeling, JGR: Solid Earth, 122.10.1002/2017JB014425Search in Google Scholar
Mangold U., 1997, Theory and performance prediction for continuous vector gravimetry based on a DGPS augmented rate bias inertial navigation system and a star tracker, Navigation, 44, 3, 329–345.10.1002/j.2161-4296.1997.tb02352.xSearch in Google Scholar
Olson D., 2010, GT-1A and GT-2A airborne gravimeters: improvements in design, operation, and processing from 2003 to 2010, In: Proc. of the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2010 Workshop, Sydney, Australia.Search in Google Scholar
Pavlis N. K., Holmes S. A., Kenyon S. C., Factor J. K., 2012, The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008), J. Geophys. Res., 117, B04406.10.1029/2011JB008916Search in Google Scholar
Schwarz K. P., Kern M. and Nassar S. M., 2002, Estimating the gravity disturbance vector from airborne gravimetry, In: Vistas for Geodesy in the New Millennium, IAG Symposia, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-662-04709-5_33Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 V.S. Vyazmin et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.