Abstract
This paper intends to focus on two aspects: how the Latin grammarians developed the concept of epenthesis, and how we can now give an explanation to this phenomenon. After having gathered the phonological evidence from the tradition of Latin philology, we propose that, in prehistoric Latin, the epenthesis of -t- in the -s.r- cluster, and the epenthesis of -p- in the -m.l- cluster, aimed at solving some problems in syllabification, that is avoiding an illicit syllable onset and an illicit coda-onset sequence, respectively. We then observe that, in classical Latin, the only productive process is the epenthesis of -p- in the -m.s- and -m.t- clusters, which has the function of fulfilling the faithfulness constraint on the inflection of the -m- stems, blocking the m > n assimilation process that later took place in the evolution from Latin to Italian.
References
Álvarez Huerta, Olga. 2005. Neutralisation consonantique en latin. In Christian Touratier (ed.), Essais de phonologie latine: Actes de l’atelier d’Aix-En-Provence, 12–13 Avril 2002, 135–155. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence.Search in Google Scholar
Ax, Wolfram. 1986. Quadripertita Ratio: Bemerkungen zur Geschichte eines aktuellen Kategoriensystems (Adiectio – Detractio – Transmutatio – Immutatio). Historiographia Linguistica 13. 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1075/hl.13.2-3.05ax.Search in Google Scholar
Baronian, Luc & Nicolas Royer-Artuso. 2021. The case for epenthesis in Armenian: Evidence from textsetting. Paper read at the Epenthesis Workshop, Stony Brook, 17–19 September 2021. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zq92Anwuqk-21zjL3y4BVWBxWokm0glj/view (accessed 9 January 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Beekes, Robert. 2010. Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Brasoveanu, Adrian & Alan Prince. 2011. Ranking and necessity: The fusional reduction algorithm. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29. 3–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9103-3.Search in Google Scholar
Cavazza, Franco. 1981. Studio su Varrone etimologo e grammatico: La lingua latina come modello di struttura linguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Search in Google Scholar
Clackson, James. 2011. A companion to the Latin language. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343397Search in Google Scholar
Cser, András. 2020. The phonology of classical Latin. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1111/1467-968X.12184Search in Google Scholar
De Martino, Marcello. 2000. I suoni di L ed LL latine secondo i grammatici d’età imperiale: Un tentativo di «revisione». Indogermanische Forschungen 105. 213–254.10.1515/if-2001-0112Search in Google Scholar
de Melo, Wolfgang David Cirilo. 2019. Varro, De lingua Latina: Introduction, text, translation, and commentary, I–II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
de Vaan, Michiel. 2006. Etymological dictionary of Latin and other Italic languages. Leiden & Boston: Brill.Search in Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Antoine Meillet. 1985. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: Histoire de mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar
Giannini, Stefania. 1995. L’indebolimento della coda sillabica in latino: Un caso di mutamento a lungo termine. In Roberto Ajello & Saverio Sani (eds.), Scritti linguistici e filologici in onore di Tristano Bolelli, 265–281. Pisa: Pacini Editore.Search in Google Scholar
Graur, Alexandru. 1963. Βλώσκω, Μέμβλωκα. In Ladislav Varcl & Ronald Frederick Willetts (eds.), Γέρας. Studies presented to George Thomson on the occasion of his 60th birthday (Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Philosophica et historica 1. Graecolatina Pragensia II), 115–117. Praha: Charles University.Search in Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 2009. Textsetting as constraint conflict. In Aroui Arleo & Jean-Louis Andy (eds.), Towards a typology of poetic forms from language to metrics and beyond, 43–62. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/lfab.2.02haySearch in Google Scholar
Jekl, Ágnes. 2011. Verbal prefixation in classical Latin and in Italian: The prefix ex-. In Renato Oniga, Rossella Iovino & Giuliana Giusti (eds.), Formal linguistics and the teaching of Latin: Theoretical and applied perspectives in comparative grammar, 201–214. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publisher.Search in Google Scholar
Kaster, Robert A. 1997. Guardians of language. The grammarian and society in late antiquity. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Leumann, Manu. 1977. Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre. München: Beck.Search in Google Scholar
Machajdíková, Barbora & Ľudmila Buzássyová. 2021. Vowel deletion before sibilant-stop clusters in Latin: Issues of syllabification, lexicon and diachrony. Journal of Latin Linguistics 20(2). 191–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2021-2005.Search in Google Scholar
Maestre Yenes, María A. H. (ed.). 1973. Ars Iuliani Toletani Episcopi. Una gramática latina de la España visigoda. Toledo: Publicaciones del Instituto Provincial de Investigaciones y Estudios Toledanos.Search in Google Scholar
Mariotti, Italo (ed.). 1967. Marii Victorini Ars Grammatica. Introduzione, testo critico e commento a cura di Italo Mariotti. Firenze: Le Monnier.Search in Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 1998. Proposte per l’interpretazione del cambiamento fonologico in area romanza nel segno della non linearità. In Giovanni Ruffino (ed.), Atti del XXI Congresso Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Romanza. I.1. Grammatica storica delle lingue romanze, 439–454. Tübingen: Max Niemayer Verlag.10.1515/9783110961522.439Search in Google Scholar
Meyer-Lübke, Wilhelm. 1935. Romanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Niedermann, Max. 1953. Précis de phonétique historique du latin. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar
Ohannesian, Maria. 2020. Prefijación y apofonía en latín. Lingue antiche e moderne 9. 185–204.Search in Google Scholar
Oniga, Renato. 2022. Varrone e la scienza del linguaggio. Classico Contemporaneo 8. 4–25.Search in Google Scholar
Porzio Gernia, Maria Luisa. 1976. Tendenze strutturali della sillaba latina in età arcaica e classica. In Scritti in onore di Giuliano Bonfante, vol. II, 757–779. Brescia: Paideia Editrice.Search in Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 2008. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. 1. Fonetica, trad. it. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar
Sadler, Jefferson Davis. 1970. Epenthesis and anaptyxis. The Classical Journal 66(1). 61–63.Search in Google Scholar
Sen, Ranjan. 2015. Syllable and segment in Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660186.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Stoppacci, Patrizia (ed.). 2010. Cassiodoro. De Orthographia. Tradizione manoscritta, fortuna, edizione critica a cura di Patrizia Stoppacci. Firenze: Sismel Edizioni del Galluzzo.Search in Google Scholar
Stoppacci, Patrizia. 2012. Le fonti del De Orthographia di Cassiodoro: modalità di ricezione e fruizione. In Frédérique Biville, Marie-Karine Lhommé & Daniel Vallat (eds.), Actes du IXe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Lyon 2–6 Septembre 2009, 739–751. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, Daniel J. 1974. Declinatio: A study of the linguistic theory of Marcus Terentius Varro. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sihols.2Search in Google Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko. 1981. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar
Walde, Alois & Johann Baptist Hofmann. 1938. Lateinisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
