Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 11, 2018

Utility of anthropometric indicators to screen for clustered cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents

Teresa Maria Bianchini de Quadros, Alex Pinheiro Gordia, Alynne Christian Ribeiro Andaki, Edmar Lacerda Mendes, Jorge Mota and Luciana Rodrigues Silva

Abstract

Background

Anthropometric indicators are associated with cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRF), but there is no consensus as to which indicator is the most suitable to screen for clustered CMRF. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of five anthropometric indicators to screen for clustered CMRF in children and adolescents.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 1139 schoolchildren aged 6–17 years from Northeastern Brazil. Body weight, height, waist circumference (WC) and subscapular (SSF) and triceps skinfold thickness (TSF) were measured. Body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were calculated. The following CMRF were evaluated: elevated total cholesterol, low high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high triglyceride concentration, hyperglycemia and high blood pressure. The participants were categorized into no CMRF, 1 CMRF, 2 CMRF and ≥3 CMRF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess the accuracy of the anthropometric indicators in predicting CMRF for age group and sex.

Results

Poor associations were observed between the anthropometric indicators and 1 CMRF (accuracy of 0.49–0.64). The indicators showed moderate associations with 2 CMRF (accuracy of 0.57–0.75) and ≥3 CMRF (accuracy of 0.59–0.79). In general, TSF exhibited the worst performance in predicting CMRF, followed by WHtR. The highest accuracies were observed for BMI, WC and SSF, with no significant difference between these indicators.

Conclusions

The routine use of BMI, WC and SSF as epidemiological screening tools for clustered CMRF in childhood and adolescence should be encouraged.


Corresponding author: Teresa Maria Bianchini de Quadros, PhD, Physical Education Course, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Av. Nestor de Melo Pita, 535-Centro, Amargosa, CEP 45300-000, Bahia, Brazil, Phone: +55 41 987977020

Acknowledgments

We thank the Municipal Education and Health Departments of Amargosa, Bahia, Brazil, for their help with the study.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia – FAPESB, Brazil, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – CAPES, Brazil, and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia – FCT, Portugal.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388:1459–544.2773328110.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1Search in Google Scholar

2. Gazolla FM, Neves Bordallo MA, Madeira IR, Madeira IR, de Miranda Carvalho CN, et al. Association between cardiovascular risk factors and carotid intima-media thickness in prepubertal Brazilian children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2015;28:579–87.2578167110.1515/jpem-2014-0116Search in Google Scholar

3. Ekta G, Tulika MG. Risk factor distribution for cardiovascular diseases among high school boys and girls of urban Dibrugarh, Assam. J Family Med Prim Care 2016;5:108–13.2745385310.4103/2249-4863.184633Search in Google Scholar

4. Carolan E, Hogan A, O’Connell J, Fallon M, Byrne D, et al. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in obese children. Ir Med J 2015;108:134–6.26062237Search in Google Scholar

5. D’Adamo E, Guardamagna O, Chiarelli F, Bartuli A, Liccardo D, et al. Atherogenic dyslipidemia and cardiovascular risk factors in obese children. Int J Endocrinol 2015;2015:912047.2566383810.1155/2015/912047Search in Google Scholar

6. Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. N Engl J Med 2017;376:254–66.2809982410.1056/NEJMra1514009Search in Google Scholar

7. Browning LM, Hsieh SD, Ashwell M. A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0.5 could be a suitable global boundary value. Nutr Res Rev 2010;23:247–69.2081924310.1017/S0954422410000144Search in Google Scholar

8. Chiolero A, Paradis G, Maximova K, Burnier M, Bovet P, et al. No use for waist-for-height ratio in addition to body mass index to identify children with elevated blood pressure. Blood Press 2013;22:17–20.2281726110.3109/08037051.2012.701376Search in Google Scholar

9. Kelishadi R, Mirmoghtadaee P, Najafi H, Keikha M. Systematic review on the association of abdominal obesity in children and adolescents with cardio-metabolic risk factors. J Res Med Sci 2015;20:294–307.26109978Search in Google Scholar

10. Reilly JJ, Kelly J, Wilson DC. Accuracy of simple clinical and epidemiological definitions of childhood obesity: systematic review and evidence appraisal. Obes Rev 2010;11:645–55.2005970410.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00709.xSearch in Google Scholar

11. Quadros TM, Gordia AP, Silva RC, Silva LR. Predictive capacity of anthropometric indicators for dyslipidemia screening in children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2015;91:455–63.10.1016/j.jped.2014.11.00626057185Search in Google Scholar

12. Quadros TM, Gordia AP, Mota J, Silva LR. Utility of body mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio as screening tools for hyperglycemia in young people. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2016;60:526–31.10.1590/2359-399700000022627901183Search in Google Scholar

13. Quadros TM, Gordia AP, Silva LR. Anthropometry and clustered cardiometabolic risk factors in young people: a systematic review. Rev Paul Pediatr 2017;35:340–50.2897729810.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;3;00013Search in Google Scholar

14. Luiz RR, Magnanini MM. The logic of sample size determination in epidemiological research. Cad Saúde Colet 2000;8:9–28.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gordon CC, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Stature, recumbent length, and weight. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1988:3–8.Search in Google Scholar

16. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000;320:1240–3.10.1136/bmj.320.7244.124010797032Search in Google Scholar

17. World Health Organization. Measuring obesity: classification and distribution of anthropometric data. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

18. Harrison GC, Buskirk ER, Carter JE, Johnston FE, Lohman TG, et al. Skinfold thicknesses and measurement technique. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1988:55–70.Search in Google Scholar

19. Pederson D, Gore C. Anthropometry measurement error. In: Norton K, Olds T, editors. Anthropometrica: a textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 1996:77–96.Search in Google Scholar

20. Malachias MV, Koch V, Colombo C, Silva S, Guimarães IC, et al. 7th Brazilian Guideline of Arterial Hypertension: Chapter 10 - Hypertension in Children and Adolescents. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016;107:53–63.27819389Search in Google Scholar

21. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499–502.433738210.1093/clinchem/18.6.499Search in Google Scholar

22. Back Giuliano IC, Caramelli B, Pellanda L, Duncan B, Mattos S, et al. I guidelines of prevention of atherosclerosis in childhood and adolescence. Arq Bras Cardiol 2005;85:4–36.16597097Search in Google Scholar

23. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2014;37:81–90.10.2337/dc14-S081Search in Google Scholar

24. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents. The fourth report on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure in children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2004;114:555–76.1528627710.1542/peds.114.S2.555Search in Google Scholar

25. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839–43.10.1148/radiology.148.3.68787086878708Search in Google Scholar

26. Jago R, Mendoza JA, Chen T, Baranowski T. Longitudinal associations between BMI, waist circumference, and cardiometabolic risk in US youth: monitoring implications. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013;21:E271–9.2359268110.1002/oby.20080Search in Google Scholar

27. Graves L, Garnett SP, Cowell CT, Baur LA, Ness A, et al. Waist-to-height ratio and cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescence: findings from a prospective birth cohort. Pediatr Obes 2014;9:327–38.10.1111/j.2047-6310.2013.00192.x23894119Search in Google Scholar

28. Agirbasli M, Tanrikulu AM, Berenson GS. Metabolic syndrome: bridging the gap from childhood to adulthood. Cardiovasc Ther 2016;34:30–6.2658835110.1111/1755-5922.12165Search in Google Scholar

29. Pereira PF, Serrano HM, Carvalho GQ, Lamounier JA, Peluzio MC, et al. Waist and waist-to-height ratio: useful to identify the metabolic risk of female adolescents? Rev Paul Pediatr 2011;29:372–7.10.1590/S0103-05822011000300011Search in Google Scholar

30. Ottobelli Chielle E, de Souza WM, da Silva TP, Moresco RN, Moretto MB. Adipocytokines, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers of clinical relevance altered in young overweight/obese subjects. Clin Biochem 2016;49:548–53.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.01.00326794633Search in Google Scholar

31. Katzmarzyk PT, Bouchard C. Where is the beef? Waist circumference is more highly correlated with BMI and total body fat than with abdominal visceral fat in children. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014;38:753–4.2401875110.1038/ijo.2013.170Search in Google Scholar

32. Bluher S, Schwarz P. Metabolically healthy obesity from childhood to adulthood – Does weight status alone matter? Metabolism 2014;63:1084–92.2503872710.1016/j.metabol.2014.06.009Search in Google Scholar

33. Bray GA, DeLany JP, Volaufova J, Harsha DW, Champagne C. Prediction of body fat in 12-y-old African American and white children: evaluation of methods. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;76:980–90.10.1093/ajcn/76.5.98012399269Search in Google Scholar

34. Johnson ST, Kuk JL, Mackenzie KA, Huang TT, Rosychuk RJ, et al. Metabolic risk varies according to waist circumference measurement site in overweight boys and girls. J Pediatr 2010;156:247–52.10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.08.01019863969Search in Google Scholar

35. Stomfai S, Ahrens W, Bammann K, Kovács E, Mårild S, et al. Intra- and inter-observer reliability in anthropometric measurements in children. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011;35:45–51.10.1038/ijo.2011.34Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-05-16
Accepted: 2018-11-11
Published Online: 2018-12-11
Published in Print: 2019-01-28

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston