Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 12, 2012

The pros and cons of sex steroid priming in growth hormone stimulation testing

  • Lawrence A. Wetterau EMAIL logo

Abstract

Diagnosing growth hormone deficiency (GHD) remains a challenge, and the role of sex steroid priming in the diagnosis of GHD continues to be debated. This review examines existing data on sex steroid priming during GHD diagnosis. Primary literature was reviewed in the area of sex steroid priming and growth hormone stimulation tests. Studies supporting sex steroid priming suggest improved diagnostic efficiency with reduced false diagnosis of GHD in peripubertal children. Those that do not support sex steroid priming note the potential for underdiagnosis of GHD and the lack of standardization in sex steroid priming procedures. To date, there is no consensus on the use of sex steroid priming prior to performing growth hormone stimulation tests in the evaluation of GHD. A more targeted approach to using sex steroid priming may be reasonable; however, the decision of whether or not to use sex steroid priming should remain with the individual clinician.


Corresponding author: Lawrence A. Wetterau, Department of Pediatrics, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 1011 Baldwin Park Blvd., Baldwin Park, CA 91706, USA Phone: +626-851-6685, Fax: +626-851-5339

Received: 2011-6-27
Accepted: 2011-11-15
Published Online: 2012-10-12
Published in Print: 2012-12-01

©2012 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpem.2011.327/html
Scroll to top button