Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether medical personnel differ from the general population in obstetrical and perinatal outcomes.
Materials and methods: The participants comprised 46 physicians and 116 nurses employed at one medical center who gave birth in its maternity hospital. General medical and obstetrical data on their latest (“index”) pregnancy and delivery were extracted from real-time computerized patient files. The control group included 162 women who gave birth during the same period in the same hospital.
Results: The study group had significantly more deliveries, cesarean sections, and terminations of pregnancy prior to the index pregnancy. The medical personnel conceived significantly more often with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) (18.8% vs. 8% for controls, P<0.05), and had significantly more obstetrical complications, i.e., premature contractions, gestational diabetes mellitus, preeclamptic toxemia, and 2nd/3rd trimester bleeding or chorioamnionitis (42.5% vs. 29% for controls, P<0.05). The rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) was lower in the study group (22.2% vs. 33.3% for controls, P=0.03). There was no difference in gestational age at delivery, birth weight, or adverse neonatal outcome.
Conclusions: Medical personnel utilized ART more frequently and had more pregnancy complications as well as a lower incidence of VBAC than non-personnel. Neonatal outcomes were similar for both groups.
References
[1] Askrog VF, Harvald B. Teratigen effekt af inhalationsanaestetika. Nord Med. 1970;16:498–500.Search in Google Scholar
[2] Ericson A, Kallen B. Survey of infants born in 1973 or 1975 to Swedish women working in operating rooms during their pregnancies. Anasth Analg. 1979;58:302–5.10.1213/00000539-197907000-00008Search in Google Scholar
[3] Ericson A, Kallen B. Hospitalization for miscarriage and delivery outcome among Swedish nurses working in operating rooms 1973-1978. Anesth Analg. 1985;64:981–8.10.1213/00000539-198510000-00007Search in Google Scholar
[4] Grunebaum A, Minkoff H, Blake D. Pregnancy among obstetricians: a comparison of births before, during, and after residency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157:79–83.10.1016/S0002-9378(87)80350-2Search in Google Scholar
[5] Hung S, Morrison DR, Whittington LA, Beck Fein S. Prepartum work, job characteristics, and risk of cesarean delivery. Birth. 2002;29:10–7.10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00150.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Klebanoff MA, Shiono PH, Rhoads G. Outcomes of pregnancy in a national sample of resident physicians. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1040–5.10.1056/NEJM199010113231506Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[7] McDonald AD, McDonald JC, Armstrong B, Cherry N, DelmorenC, Nolin AD, et al. Occupation and pregnancy outcome. Br J Ind Med. 1987;44:521–6.10.1136/oem.44.8.521Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[8] Miller NH, Katz VL, Cefalo RC. Pregnancies among physicians: a historical cohort study. J Reprod Med. 1989;34:790–6.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Osborn LM, Harris DL, Reading JC, Prather MB. Outcome of pregnancies experienced during residency. J Fam Pract. 1990;31:618–22.Search in Google Scholar
[10] Phelan ST. Pregnancy during residency: II. Obstetric complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72(3 Pt 1):431–6.Search in Google Scholar
[11] Pinhas-Hamiel O, Rotstein Z, Achiron A, Gabbay U, Achiron R, Barak Y, et al. Pregnancy during residency--an Israeli survey of women physicians. Health Care Women Int. 1999;20:63–70.10.1080/073993399245962Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] Schwartz RW. Pregnancy in physicians: characteristics and complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;66:672–6.Search in Google Scholar
[13] Vaisman AI. Work in surgical theaters and its influence on the health of anaesthesiologists. Eskp Khir Anest. 1967;12: 44–9.Search in Google Scholar
The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
©2015 by De Gruyter
