To characterize the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) contraindicated home births and the women who are receiving these births in hopes of identifying venues for intervention.
The National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) birth certificate records from 1990 to 2015 were used. “Planned home births” were defined as those births in which birthplace was coded as “residence” and birth attendant was coded as “certified nurse midwife (CNM)” or “other midwife”. Contraindicated home births were defined as “planned home births” from 1990 to 2015 that had one or more of the ACOG risk factors for home births, which include vaginal birth after prior cesarean delivery (VBAC), breech presentation and multiple gestations.
A review of trends in contraindicated home births from 1990 to 2015 suggests that they are increasing in number (481–1396) and as a percentage of total births (0.01%–0.04%, P<0.001). There has been an increase in the proportion of college-educated women (31%–51%, P<0.001). Most women receive prenatal care (>95%), which is most frequently initiated in the first trimester. The majority of home births were paid out-of-pocket (65%–69%).
The increasing number of contraindicated home births in the United States requires public health action. Home births are likely a matter of choice rather than a lack of resources. It is unclear if women choose home births while knowing the risk or due to a lack of information. Prenatal education about contraindicated home births is possible, as almost all women receive prenatal care.
 Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, Pinette MG, Cartin A, Blackstone J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:243.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Snowden JM, Tilden EL, Snyder J, Quigley B, Caughey AB, Cheng YW. Planned out-of-hospital birth and birth outcomes. New Engl J Med. 2015;373:2642–53.10.1056/NEJMsa1501738Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Arabin B, Dudenhausen J, Orosz B, Chervenak FA. Underlying causes of neonatal deaths in term singleton pregnancies: home births versus hospital births in the United States. J Perinat Med. 2017;45:349–57.10.1515/jpm-2016-0200Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 697: planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:779–80.10.1097/AOG.0000000000002015Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 476: planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(Pt 1):425–8.10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820eee20Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Johnson KC, Daviss B-A. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. BMJ. 2005;330:1416–9.10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1416Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Brent RL, Arabin B, Levene MI, Chervenak FA. Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:350.e1–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Wasden SW, Chasen ST, Perlman JM, Illuzzi JL, Chervenak FA, Grünebaum A, et al. Planned home birth and the association with neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. J Perinat Med. 2017;45:1055–60.10.1515/jpm-2016-0292Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG statement on home births. ACOG News release, 2008. Available from http://www.cfmidwifery.org/pdf/ACOGPRnr0206082cfm.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
 Macdorman MF, Declercq E, Mathews TJ, Stotland N. Trends and characteristics of home vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the United States and selected states. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:737–44.10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824bb050Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Krans EE, Davis MM. Strong start for mothers and newborns: implications for prenatal care delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;26:511.10.1097/GCO.0000000000000118Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 Partridge S, Balayla J, Holcroft CA, Abenhaim HA. Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 US deliveries over 8 years. Am J Perinatol. 2012;29: 787–94.10.1055/s-0032-1316439Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Care PP. Evidence-based prenatal care: Part I. General prenatal care and counseling issues. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71:1307–16.Search in Google Scholar
 Vinikoor LC, Messer LC, Laraia BA, Kaufman JS. Reliability of variables on the North Carolina birth certificate: a comparison with directly queried values from a cohort study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010;24:102–12.10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01087.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
 DiGiuseppe DL, Aron DC, Ranbom L, Harper DL, Rosenthal GE. Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Matern Child Health J. 2002;6:169–79.10.1023/A:1019726112597Search in Google Scholar
 Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Sapra KJ, Brent RL, Levene MI, Arabin B, et al. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006–2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:390.e1–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.047Search in Google Scholar PubMed
 Grünebaum A, McCullough LB, Sapra KJ, Arabin B, Chervenak FA. Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:401.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Presentation: Related abstract presented at The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting on May 14, 2016 in Washington, DC, as a poster presentation.
©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston