Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter May 15, 2019

Effect of gender on growth-restricted fetuses born preterm

Tea Štimac, Ana-Maria Šopić-Rahelić, Jelena Ivandić, Eduard Ekinja and Isaac Blickstein

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effect of fetal gender in small-for-gestational age (SGA) neonates with birth weight less than the fifth percentile by gestational age.

Methods

We compared male and female SGA neonates for maternal and neonatal outcomes in the following gestational age subgroups: at <32 + 6, 33 + 0–36 + 6 and at ≥37 + 0 weeks of gestation.

Results

We examined 159, 154 and 2363 SGA neonates born at <32 + 6, 33 + 0 to 36 + 6 and ≥37 weeks of pregnancy, respectively, whose birth weight was below the fifth percentile for gestational age and who met our inclusion criteria. Overall, there were no significant differences between the mothers of males and females, except that there were more males at term and the incidence of nulliparas was greater among the mothers of males. In terms of outcomes, males had a similar incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and admissions to intensive care. Interestingly, low Apgar scores were more common in preterm females born at 33–37 weeks and vice versa in births over 37 weeks.

Conclusion

Our data do not support an advantage of either gender in preterm birth of infants who are most likely growth restricted.


Corresponding author: Isaac Blickstein, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Affiliated with the Hadassah-Hebrew University School of Medicine, 76100 Rehovot, Jerusalem, Israel, Tel.: +972-545-201789, Fax: +972-89411944

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Ingemarsson I. Gender aspects of preterm births. Br J Obstect Gynaecol 2003;110:34–8.Search in Google Scholar

2. Zisk JL, Genen LH, Kirkby S, Webb D, Greenspan J, Dysart K. Do premature female infants really do better than their male counterparts? Am J Perinatol 2011;28:241–6.Search in Google Scholar

3. Challis J, Newnham J, Petraglia F, Yeganegi M, Bocking A. Fetal sex and preterm birth. Placenta 2013;34:95–9.Search in Google Scholar

4. Peelen MJ, Kazemier BM, Ravelli AC, De Groot CJ, Van Der Post JA, Mol BW, et al. Impact of fetal gender on the risk of preterm birth, a national cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95:1034–41.Search in Google Scholar

5. Teoh PJ, Ridout A, Seed P, Tribe RM, Shennan AH. Gender and preterm birth: is male fetal gender a clinically important risk factor for preterm birth in high-risk women? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;225:155–9.Search in Google Scholar

6. O’Driscoll DN, McGovern M, Greene CM, Molloy EJ. Gender disparities in preterm neonatal outcomes. Acta Paediatr 2018;107:1494–9.Search in Google Scholar

7. Drazancic A, Pevec-Stupar R, Kern J. Fetal growth in Zagreb. Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol 1988;28:13–20.Search in Google Scholar

8. McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among new born infants. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1234–8.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-03-03
Accepted: 2019-04-10
Published Online: 2019-05-15
Published in Print: 2019-08-27

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston