Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 21, 2020

Normal values of cardiac axis (CA) measurements in healthy fetuses during the first trimester screening ultrasound

Assaad Kesrouani ORCID logo, Wael Abdallah, Roland Kharrat, Elie Choueiry, Linda Daou and Bernard Nasr

Abstract

Objectives

To report the normal fetal cardiac axis (CA) values at the time of the first trimester screening ultrasound.

Methods

Standardized images and measurement of the CA were obtained from 100 healthy fetuses between 11+0 and 13+6 weeks of gestation along with the nucal thichkness (NT), Crown–rump length (CRL) and other measurements. We excluded cases with abnormal NT, later diagnosis of abnormalities, and suspected fetal cardiopathy during the pregnancy follow-up. Data analysis was performed after all the patients delivered and cardiopathy was excluded.

Results

CA was measurable in all the cases. Higher CRL was associated with a decrease in the CA. The mean ± SD embryonic/fetal CA was 48±5,2°, ranging from 39 to 60°, The 2.5 percentile was defined at 40° and the 97.5 percentile at 59°. The Pearson test resulted in a significant correlation between CA and CRL with a coefficient R of 70% and p-value <0.01.

Conclusions

CA tends to decrease at the 11 to 13+6 gestational ages. We defined 2.5 and 97.5% curves for the normal values of CA in our Middle Eastern population. A larger study will be required to differentiate normal and abnormal values for the early detection of heart abnormalities.


Corresponding author: Assaad Kesrouani, MD, Professor (full), Program Director, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, St Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon; and Bellevue Medical Center Hospital, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Adib Ishac Street, Achrafie, PO Box 166830, Beirut, Lebanon, Tel.: +(00) 961 3222034, Fax: +(00)961 5464477, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Ghassan Sleilaty for his help in the statistical analysis of this study.

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: This study abides by the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Saint Joseph University in Beirut and is registered as CEHDF-1132.

References

1. McFadyen, A, Gledhill, J, Whitlow, B, Economides, D. First trimester ultrasound screening. BMJ 1998;317:694–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7160.694. Search in Google Scholar

2. Economides, DL, Braithwaite, JM. First trimester ultrasonographic diagnosis of fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;105:53–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09350.x. Search in Google Scholar

3. Quarello, E, Lafouge, A, Fries, N, Salomon, LJ, the, CFEF. Basic heart examination: feasibility study of first-trimester systematic simplified fetal echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;49:224–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15866. Search in Google Scholar

4. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology null, Carvalho, JS, Allan, LD, Chaoui, R, Copel, JA, DeVore, GR, et al.. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:348–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12403. Search in Google Scholar

5. Christoffels, VM, Burch, JBE, Moorman, AFM. Architectural plan for the heart: early patterning and delineation of the chambers and the nodes. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2004;14:301–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2004.09.002. Search in Google Scholar

6. Carvalho, JS, Moscoso, G, Tekay, A, Campbell, S, Thilaganathan, B, Shinebourne, EA. Clinical impact of first and early second trimester fetal echocardiography on high risk pregnancies. Heart 2004;90:921–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.015065. Search in Google Scholar

7. Weerakkody, Y. Four chamber cardiac view (fetal) | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org [Internet]. Radiopaedia. [cited 2020 Sep 5]. Available from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/four-chamber-cardiac-view-fetal. Search in Google Scholar

8. Filly, RA, Crane, JP. Routine obstetric sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:713–8. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2002.21.7.713. Search in Google Scholar

9. Syngelaki, A, Chelemen, T, Dagklis, T, Allan, L, Nicolaides, KH. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2642. Search in Google Scholar

10. Achiron, R, Tadmor, O. Screening for fetal anomalies during the first trimester of pregnancy: transvaginal versus transabdominal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991;1:186–91. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1991.01030186.x. Search in Google Scholar

11. Hoffman, JI. The global burden of congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc J Afr 2013;24:141–5. https://doi.org/10.5830/cvja-2013-028. Search in Google Scholar

12. Dolk, H, Loane, M, Garne, E. European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) Working Group. Congenital heart defects in Europe: prevalence and perinatal mortality, 2000 to 2005. Circulation 2011;123:841–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.110.958405. Search in Google Scholar

13. Axt-Fliedner, R, Kreiselmaier, P, Schwarze, A, Krapp, M, Gembruch, U. Development of hypoplastic left heart syndrome after diagnosis of aortic stenosis in the first trimester by early echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:106–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2824. Search in Google Scholar

14. Hutchinson, D, McBrien, A, Howley, L, Yamamoto, Y, Sekar, P, Motan, T, et al.. First-trimester fetal echocardiography: identification of cardiac structures for screening from 6 to 13 weeks’ gestational age. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017;30:763–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2017.03.017. Search in Google Scholar

15. McBrien, A, Howley, L, Yamamoto, Y, Hutchinson, D, Hirose, A, Sekar, P, et al.. Changes in fetal cardiac axis between 8 and 15 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:653–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12478. Search in Google Scholar

16. Jung, Y-J, Lee, B-R, Kim, GJ. Efficacy of fetal cardiac axis evaluation in the first trimester as a screening tool for congenital heart defect or aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2020;63:278–85. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.278. Search in Google Scholar

17. Sinkovskaya, E, Horton, S, Berkley, E, Cooper, JK, Indika, S, Abuhamad, A. Defining the fetal cardiac axis between 11 + 0 and 14 + 6 weeks of gestation: experience with 100 consecutive pregnancies [Internet]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:676–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8814. Search in Google Scholar

18. Sinkovskaya, ES, Chaoui, R, Karl, K, Andreeva, E, Zhuchenko, L, Abuhamad, AZ. Fetal cardiac axis and congenital heart defects in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:453–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000000608. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-09-27
Accepted: 2020-12-02
Published Online: 2020-12-21
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston