Abstract
This paper examines the performance of goalkeepers in the English Premier League. A commonly used metric to assess goalkeeper ability is the saves-to-shots ratio. It is shown that goalkeepers playing in weak teams have to defend against on-target shots that have a relatively high probability of scoring as compared to their counterparts in higher-performing teams. This tends to produce a downwards bias in the save-to-shots ratio of goalkeepers in weak teams, an effect which may lead to their ability being underestimated. A logistic regression model is used to adjust goalkeepers’ saves-to-shots ratios for differences in save difficulty. The adjusted ratio is more stable across seasons, suggesting that it is a more reliable estimate of true goalkeeper ability than the unadjusted ratio.
References
Bar-Eli, Michael, Ofer H. Azar, Ilana Ritov, Yael Keidar-Levin, and Galit Schein. 2007. “Action Bias among Elite Soccer Goalkeepers: The Case of Penalty Kicks.” Journal of Economic Psychology 28:606–621.10.1016/j.joep.2006.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Chiappori, P.-A., Steven Levitt, and Timothy Groseclose. 2002. “Testing Mixed-Strategy Equilibria When Players are Heterogeneous: The Case of Penalty Kicks in Soccer.” American Economic Review 1138–1151.10.1257/00028280260344678Search in Google Scholar
Craig, Cathy M., Eric Berton, Guillaume Rao, Laure Fernandez, and Reinoud J. Bootsma. 2006. “Judging Where a Ball will Go: The Case of Curved Free Kicks in Football.” Naturwissenschaften 93:97–101.10.1007/s00114-005-0071-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Dessing, Joost C. and Cathy M. Craig. 2010. “Bending it like Beckham: How to Visually Fool the Goalkeeper.” PLos One 5:e13161.10.1371/journal.pone.0013161Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Geisser, Seymour. 1975. “The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications.”Journal of the American Statistical Association 70:320–328.10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865Search in Google Scholar
Moschini, GianCarlo. 2004. “Nash Equilibrium in Strictly Competitive Games: Live Play in Soccer.” Economics Letters 85:365–371.10.1016/j.econlet.2004.06.003Search in Google Scholar
Oberstone, Joel. 2010. “Comparing English Premier League Goalkeepers: Identifying the Pitch Actions that Differentiate the Best from the Rest.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 6:9.10.2202/1559-0410.1221Search in Google Scholar
Paul, Prabasaj, Michael L. Pennell, and Stanley Lemeshow. 2013. “Standardizing the Power of the Hosmer–Lemeshow Goodness of Fit Test in Large Data Sets.“ Statistics in Medicine 32:67–80.10.1002/sim.5525Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Pollard, Richard, Jake Ensum, and Samuel Taylor. 2004. “Estimating the Probability of a Shot Resulting in a Goal: The Effects of Distance, Angle and Space.” International Journal of Soccer and Science 2:50–55.Search in Google Scholar
Roskes, Marieke, Daniel Sligte, Shaul Shalvi, and Carsten K. W. De Dreu. 2011. “The right side? Under Time Pressure, Approach Motivation Leads to Right-Oriented Bias.” Psychological Science 22:1403–1407.10.1177/0956797611418677Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Savelsbergh, Geert J. P., A. Mark Williams, John Van Der Kamp, and Paul Ward. 2002. “Visual Search, Anticipation and Expertise in Soccer Goalkeepers.” Journal of Sports Sciences 20:279–287.10.1080/026404102317284826Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Schuckers, M. 2011. “DIGR: A Defense Independent Rating of NHL Goaltenders Using Spatially Smoothed Save Percentage Maps.” In Proceedings of the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.Search in Google Scholar
Sørensen, Henrik, Martin Thomassen, and Morten Zacho. 2008. “Biomechanical Profile of Danish Elite and Sub-Elite Soccer Goalkeepers.” Football Science 5:37–44.Search in Google Scholar
Wood, Greg and Mark R. Wilson. 2010 “A moving Goalkeeper Distracts Penalty Takers and Impairs Shooting Accuracy.” Journal of Sports Sciences 28:937–946.10.1080/02640414.2010.495995Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
