Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 27, 2018

Estimating the duration of professional tennis matches for varying formats

  • Stephanie Ann Kovalchik EMAIL logo and Martin Ingram


The duration of matches has been a common concern in professional tennis. Governing bodies have recently begun to introduce new match formats, like Fast4, to curb match lengths yet the impact of these formats on the professional game remains poorly understood. In this paper, we develop a shot-level Monte Carlo match simulation approach for estimating the duration, points played, and upset probability given a specific match format. Our model is built on validated models of the in-play and between-play time of matches using Hawk-eye tracking data and publicly available shot-level tennis statistics. When we applied our models to a variety of match formats with serve characteristics representative of current elite players, we found that Fast4 formats had an expected duration of 60 minutes, best of 3 averaged 90 minutes, and best of 5 averaged 120 minutes. Our results also showed that longer matches favor the better player and make match outcomes more predictable. Fast4 formats had a typical upset frequency of 20% compared to 13% for best of 3 matches and 10% for best of 5 matches. The modeling approach we have developed can be a useful resource for tennis governing bodies in assessing the impact of new match formats.


ATP World Tour. 2017. “ATP Announces Trial of Rule Changes & Innovation for Next Gen ATP Finals in Milan.” in Google Scholar

Barnett, T. 2016. “A Recursive Approach to Modeling the Amount of Time Played In a Tennis Match.” Medicine & Science in Tennis, 21(2):27–35.Search in Google Scholar

Breznik, K. and V. Batagelj. 2012. “Retired Matches among Male Professional Tennis Players.” Journal of Sports Science & Medicine 11(2):270.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, P. and L. Edwards. 2017. “Is it Defensible for Women to Play Fewer Sets than Men in Grand Slam Tennis?” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 44(3):1–20.10.1080/00948705.2017.1380950Search in Google Scholar

Kilit, B., Ö. Şenel, E. Arslan, and S. Can. 2016. “Physiological Responses and Match Characteristics in Professional Tennis Players During a One-hour Simulated Tennis Match.” Journal of Human Kinetics 51(1):83–92.10.1515/hukin-2015-0173Search in Google Scholar

Klaassen, F. and J. R. Magnus. 2014. Analyzing Wimbledon: The Power of Statistics. USA: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199355952.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kovalchik, S. 2015. “Grand Slams are Short-Changing Women’s Tennis.” Significance 12(5):12–17.10.1111/j.1740-9713.2015.00852.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kovalchik, S. 2016. “When Tennis Marathons Become Too Much of a Good Thing.” in Google Scholar

Kovalchik, S. A. 2014. “The Older they Rise the Younger they Fall: Age and Performance Trends in Men’s Professional Tennis from 1991 to 2012.” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 10(2):99–107.10.1515/jqas-2013-0091Search in Google Scholar

Mastercard Hopman Cup. 2016. “FAST4 for Mastercard Hopman Cup Mixed Doubles.” in Google Scholar

Morante, S. 2006. “Training Recommendations Based on Match Characteristics of Professional Singles Tennis.” Medicine and Science in Tennis 11(3):10–12.Search in Google Scholar

Newton, P. K. and K. Aslam. 2006. “Monte Carlo Tennis.” SIAM Review 48(4):722–742.10.1137/050640278Search in Google Scholar

Pereira, T. J. C., F. Y. Nakamura, M. T. de Jesus, C. L. R. Vieira, M. S. Misuta, R. M. L. de Barros, and F. A. Moura. 2017. “Analysis of the Distances Covered and Technical Actions Performed by Professional Tennis Players During Official Matches.” Journal of Sports Sciences 35(4):361–368.10.1080/02640414.2016.1165858Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Pollard, G. H. 1987. “A New Tennis Scoring System.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 58(3):229–233.10.1080/02701367.1987.10605454Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Search in Google Scholar

Schutz, R. W. 1970. “A Mathematical Model for Evaluating Scoring Systems with Specific Reference to Tennis.” Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation 41(4):552–561.10.1080/10671188.1970.10615015Search in Google Scholar

Skilbeck, J. 2016. “Wimbledon Admit ‘People’s Sunday’ Play is Being Discussed After Repeated Rain Delays Add to Backlog.” in Google Scholar

Van Rossum, G. and F. L. Drake Jr. 1995. Python Reference Manual. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Vergara, P. 2013. “Should Tennis Stick with Five-Setters?” in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-2-27
Published in Print: 2018-3-28

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.3.2024 from
Scroll to top button