Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 27, 2022

The Conceptual Origin of Worldview in Kant and Fichte

  • Alexander T. Englert EMAIL logo


Kant and Fichte developed the concept of a worldview as a way of reflecting on experience as a whole. But what does it mean to form a worldview? And what role did it play in the German Idealist tradition? This paper seeks to answer these questions through a detailed analysis of the form of a philosophical worldview and its historical portent, both of which remain unexplored in the literature. The dearth of attention is partially to blame on Kant’s desultory development of it, as well as its place in Fichte’s understudied lectures on religion. In this paper, I first reconstruct Kant’s conception as the starting point and then trace it to Fichte who went on to evolve it further. Fichte endorses the basic conceptual shape pioneered by Kant, namely, a reflective process of positing an idea and then checking the coherence of necessary judgments relative to it. However, Fichte came to realize that its philosophical function needed expanding. Beyond recognizing the possibility for alternative worldviews, Fichte further fleshed out how worldview creation could lead to human flourishing. The common feature between both thinkers is that the formation of a worldview aims to turn philosophy into a life-orienting exercise.

Corresponding author: Alexander T. Englert, University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, 304 Louis Marx Hall, 08544, Princeton, NJ, USA, E-mail:


Adamson, R. 1881. Fichte. Edinburgh: W. Blackwood.Search in Google Scholar

Adickes, E. 1920. “Kants Opus postumum: dargestellt und beurteilt.” In Kant-Studien Ergänzungsheft Nr, Vol. 50. Berlin: Reuter & Reichard.Search in Google Scholar

Beiser, F. 2006. “Moral Faith and the Highest Good.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy, edited by Guyer, P., 588–629. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL052182303X.018Search in Google Scholar

Bruno, G. 2014. “Freedom and Pluralism in Schelling’s Critique of Fichte’s Jena Wissenschaftslehre.” Idealistic Studies 43 (1/2): 71–86, in Google Scholar

Düsing, K. 1971. “Das Problem des höchsten Gutes in Kants praktischer Philosophie.” Kant-Studien 62 (1–4): 5–42, in Google Scholar

Englert, A. 2022. “How a Kantian Ideal Can Be Practical.” Inquiry 65: 1–28, in Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. 1962–. Gesamtausgabe (GA) der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Search in Google Scholar

Förster, E. 2010. “What Is the “Highest Point” of Transcendental Philosophy?” In Rethinking Kant, Vol. 2, edited by Muchnik, P., 257–71. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Franks, P. 2005. All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674272750Search in Google Scholar

Fugate, C. 2019. “Kant’s World Concept of Philosophy and Cosmopolitanism.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 101 (4): 535–83, in Google Scholar

Harman, G. 1986. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1968–. Gesammelte Werke (GW) im Auftrag der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.Search in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1982. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, trans. Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Henrich, D. 2003. Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Höffe, O. 2008. “Der Mensch als Endzweck.” In Klassiker Auslegen. Kritik der Urteilskraft, edited by Höffe, (hrsg.), O., 289–308. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1524/9783050050157.289Search in Google Scholar

Huygens, C. 1698. Cosmotheoros, oder weltbetrachtende Muthmassungen von deren himmlischen Erdkugeln und deren Schmuck, übers. J. Wurzelbaur in 1703 (Leipzig).Search in Google Scholar

Insole, C. 2008. “The Irreducible Importance of Religious Hope in Kant’s Conception of the Highest Good.” Philosophy 83 (3): 333–51, in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1902–. Akademie Ausgabe (AA) der Königlichen Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1929. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kaulbach, F. 1990. Philosophie des Perspektivismus: Wahrheit und Perspektive bei Kant, Hegel und Nietzsche. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Search in Google Scholar

Kroner, R. 1914. Kants Weltanschauung. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Search in Google Scholar

Makkreel, R. 2021. Kant’s Worldview: How Judgment Shapes Human Comprehension. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.10.2307/j.ctv20zbkx5Search in Google Scholar

Medicus, F. 1914. Fichtes Leben. Leipzig: Meiner.Search in Google Scholar

Meier, H. 1967. “Weltanschauung”: Studien zu einer Geschichte und Theorie des Begriffs [Inaugural-Dissertation]. Münster: Westfälischen Wilhelms- Universität zu Münster.Search in Google Scholar

Naugle, D. 2002. Worldview: The History of a Concept. Cambridge: W.B. Eedermans.Search in Google Scholar

Schelling, F. W. J. 1927. Schellings Werke (WW) Nach der Originalausgabe in neuer Anordnung, hrsg. Manfred Schröter. München: Beck and Oldenbourg.Search in Google Scholar

Schelling, F. W. J. 1979. The Unconditional in Human Knowledge: Four Early Essays, trans. Fritz Marti. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schnädelbach, H. 2000. Philosophie in der modernen Kultur. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar

Schrempf, C. 1891. Die Christliche Weltanschauung und Kants sittlicher Glaube. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Windelband, W. 1904. Immanuel Kant und seine Weltanschauung. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Zöller, G. 2014. “‘Life into Which an Eye Is Inserted’: Fichte on the Fusion of Vitality and Vision.” Rivista di Storia della Filosofia 69 (4): 601–18, in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-06-27
Published in Print: 2023-04-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.12.2023 from
Scroll to top button