Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 22, 2018

Kant’s Debt to Baumgarten in His Religious (Un‐)Grounding of Ethics

  • Toshiro Osawa
From the journal Kant Yearbook


Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten’s ethics had a significant influence on the formation of Kant’s ethics. The extent of this influence, however, has not been sufficiently investigated by existing Kant scholarship. Filling this gap, this paper aims to reveal Baumgarten’s substantial influence on the formation of Kant’s ethics, particularly the complex ways in which Kant’s ethics retains the concept of God as crucial for ensuring that his ethics persist under the scrutiny of reason. In a systematic comparison of the ethics of the two philosophers, I argue that Kant alters and yet accommodates several aspects of Baumgarten’s ethics in his own version of the system of ethics more thoroughly than has previously been perceived. More specifically, I argue, first, that Kant’s rejection of Baumgarten’s conception of “duties towards God” and his alternative notion that duties are recognized as if they were divine commands unveil his criticism of Baumgarten’s conception of how religion is situated in ethics. Second, I argue that Kant’s argument for the extension of pure reason for practical purposes discloses his critical response to Baumgarten’s optimistic assumption about the entirety of pure reason.

Published Online: 2018-10-22
Published in Print: 2018-10-22

© 2018 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 11.12.2023 from
Scroll to top button