Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 28, 2022

Re-constructing Kant: Kant’s Teleological Moral Realism

Facundo Rodriguez EMAIL logo
From the journal Kant Yearbook

Abstract

It is common for constructivists to claim that Kant was the first philosopher to understand moral facts as ‘constructions of reason’. They think that Kant, just like the constructivist, proposes a procedure – the Categorical Imperative – from which the order of value can be ‘constructed’ and grounds the validity of this construction procedure not in some previous value but in its capacity to solve a practical problem, the problem of ‘free agency’. I here argue that this reading is misguided and propose that we read Kant as a teleological realist instead. Kant is a realist in that he takes the value of rational nature to be objective and so not ‘constructed’. Kant is a teleological realist insofar as his derivation of the moral law from the objective value of rational nature relies on a teleological understanding of rational nature.

Acknowledgements

I am profoundly indebted to Katrin Flikschuh, who has enthusiastically dedicated time and thought to my project, as well as to Paloma Morales, Santiago Rodriguez, Valentina Gianera and the reviewers at Kant Yearbook for their acute comments and suggestions. I would also want to thank Paloma, Virginie and Juan Morales for their unconditional support during the time I was writing the first drafts of this paper, at the start of the COVID pandemic.

References

All translations are quoted from The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (1996) and the quotation rules followed are those established by the Akademie Ausgabe. Kant, Immanuel (1900 ff): Gesammelte Schriften. Hrsg.: Bd. 1 – 22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin.

  Following standard use, reference to Aristotle’s work will use Bekker page, column, and line numbers. I use the abbreviations Met. for Metaphysics.

Ameriks, Karl (2003): Interpreting Kant's Critiques, Oxford.10.1093/0199247315.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle & Ross, W.D. (ed.) (1924): Metaphysics, Oxford.10.1093/oseo/instance.00263632Search in Google Scholar

Bachman, Zachary (2018): Moral Rationalism and the Normativity of Constitutive Principles, in: Philosophia 46(1), pp. 1 – 19.Search in Google Scholar

Bagnoli, Carla (2017): Constructivism in Metaethics, 21 December 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/constructivism-metaethics/.Search in Google Scholar

Barry, Brian (1989): Theories of Justice, Berkeley.10.1525/9780520341005Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Shlomit Wygoda (2021): Mind Independence versus Mind Nongroundedness: Two Kinds of Objectivism, in: Ethics 132(1), pp. 108 – 132.Search in Google Scholar

Copp, David (2013): Is constructivism an alternative to moral realism?, in: C. Bagnoli (ed.): Constructivism in Ethics, Cambridge, pp. 108 – 132.10.1017/CBO9781139094221.007Search in Google Scholar

Cullity, Garrett & Gaut, Berys (1997): Introduction, in: G. Cullity, B. Gaut (eds.): Ethics and Practical Reason, Oxford, pp. 1 – 28.Search in Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen & Gibbard, Allan & Railton, Peter (1997): Moral Discourse and Practice, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald (1977): Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Enoch, David (2011): Taking Morality Seriously, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579969.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gaut, Berys (1997): The Structure of Practical Reason, in: G. Cullity, B. Gaut (eds.): Ethics and Practical Reason, Oxford, pp. 161 – 188.Search in Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul (2016): Kantian Perfectionism, in: P. Guyer (ed.): The Virtues of Freedom, Cambridge, pp. 70 – 86.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755647.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine (1996a): Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139174503Search in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine (1998): Introduction, in: Kant, Immanuel: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Cambridge, pp. vii-xxxi.Search in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine (1986): Kant's Formula of Humanity, in: Kant-Studien 77(2), pp. 183 – 202.Search in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine (2008): Realism and Constructivism in Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy, in: C. Korsgaard: The Constitution of Agency, Oxford, pp. 302 – 326.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552733.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine (2009): Self-Constitution, Agency, Identity and Integrity, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552795.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, Christine (1996b): The Sources of Normativity, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511554476Search in Google Scholar

Krasnoff, Larry (1999): How Kantian is Constructivism?, in: Kant-Studien 90(4), pp. 385 – 409.Search in Google Scholar

Langton, Rae (2007): Objective and Unconditioned Value, in: Philosophical Review 116 (2), pp. 157 – 185.Search in Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora (1989): Constructivisms in ethics, in: O. O'Neill: Constructions of Reason, Cambridge, pp. 206 – 218.Search in Google Scholar

Rabinowicz, Wlodek & Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni (1999): A Distinction in Value: Intrinisc and For Its Own Sake, in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100(1), pp. 33 – 52.Search in Google Scholar

Rauscher, Frederick (2015): Naturalism and Realism in Kant's Ethics, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781316105252Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, John (1980): Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory, in: The Journal of Philosophy 77(9), pp. 515 – 72.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, John (2000): Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Ripstein, Arthur (2014): Kant's Juridical Theory of Colonialism, in: K. Flikschuh, L. Ypi (eds.): Kant and Colonialism: Historical and Critical Perspectives, Oxford, pp. 145 – 169.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669622.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Scanlon, Thomas (2012): The Appeal and Limits of Constructivism, in: J. Lenman, Y. Shemmer (eds.): Constructivism in Practical Philosophy, Oxford, pp. 226 – 242.Search in Google Scholar

Sensen, Oliver (2013): Kant's constructivism, in C. Bagnoli (ed.): Constructivism in Ethics, Cambridge, pp. 63 – 81.10.1017/CBO9781139094221.005Search in Google Scholar

Shafer-Landau, Russ (2003): Moral Realism: A Defence, Oxford.10.1093/0199259755.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Stern, Robert (2013): Moral skepticism, constructivism, and the value of humanity, in: C. Bagnoli (ed.): Constructivism in Ethics, Cambridge, pp. 22 – 41.10.1017/CBO9781139094221.003Search in Google Scholar

Stern, Robert (2012): Understanding Moral Obligation: Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511997747Search in Google Scholar

Street, Sharon (2008): Constructivism about reasons, in: R. Shafer-Landau (ed.): Oxford Studies in Metaethics 3, Oxford, pp. 207 – 245.Search in Google Scholar

Street, Sharon (2010): What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics, in: Philosophy Compass 5, pp. 362 – 384.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, Allen (2008): Kantian Ethics, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511809651Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-09-28

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/kantyb-2022-0004/html
Scroll Up Arrow