Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 13, 2022

The analysis of fire ignition frequency calculation for small modular light water reactors

Hong Jiang, Zihan Liu and Changhong Peng
From the journal Kerntechnik

Abstract

With the release of reports such as NUREG/CR-6850, the calculation of ignition frequency concerning general large-scale Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) has matured. However, there is currently a lack of methods for calculating the ignition frequency in the case of Small Modular Light Water Reactors (SMRs). By studying the calculation of ignition frequency reported in NUREG/CR-6850, we propose a method for calculating the ignition frequency in SMRs, which is based on the generic ignition frequency at the component level. The problem of counting ignition sources is discussed in detail, and we determine the component-level ignition frequencies due to different types of ignition sources. In order to improve the calculation of the ignition frequency in SMRs, this paper provides two methods, which are based on the prior lognormal distribution and the prior Gamma distribution, respectively, for updating ignition frequency. We also consider the effect of the accumulation of fire events on the posterior mean determined by both methods. In this paper, we suggest that the method based on the prior lognormal distribution should be used in the initial stage of updates of ignition frequency. As data for plant-specific events accumulate, the approach based on the prior Gamma distribution should be considered.


Corresponding author: Changhong Peng, School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 96, Jinzhai Road, Baohe District, Hefei, 230026, China, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Angner, A., Berg, H., Röwekamp, M., Werner, W., and Gauvain, J. (2007). The OECD FIRE database. Kerntechnik 72: 120–126, https://doi.org/10.3139/124.100327.Search in Google Scholar

Arshi, S.S., Nematollahi, M., and Sepanloo, K. (2010). Coupling CFAST fire modeling and SAPHIRE probabilistic assessment software for internal fire safety evaluation of a typical TRIGA research reactor. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95: 166–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

Black, G.A., Aydogan, F., and Koerner, C.L. (2019). Economic viability of light water small modular nuclear reactors: general methodology and vendor data. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 103: 248–258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.041.Search in Google Scholar

Cerotti, D., Gribaudo, M., and Bobbio, A. (2014). Markovian agents models for wireless sensor networks deployed in environmental protection. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 130: 149–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.05.010.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Y. and Yang, Z. (2021). Research on internal fire ignition frequency of fire probability safety analysis in small module reactor. Int. Conf. Nucl. Eng. 85260:V003T013A009, https://doi.org/10.1115/icone28-65152.Search in Google Scholar

Jin, Y. and Jang, B.S. (2015). Probabilistic fire risk analysis and structural safety assessment of FPSO topside module. Ocean Eng. 104: 725–737, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.019.Search in Google Scholar

Jung, W.S., Lee, Y.H., and Yang, J.E. (2009). Development of a new quantification method for a fire PSA. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94: 1650–1657, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, S. and Lee, S. (2021). Maximum likelihood estimation of probabilistic non-suppression model for OECD NPP electrical fire applying non-negative continuous distribution. Fire Saf. J. 122: 103323, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103323.Search in Google Scholar

Kloos, M. and Peschke, J. (2015). Improved modelling and assessment of the performance of firefighting means in the frame of a fire PSA. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2015: 238723, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/238723.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Y.H., Kim, J.H., and Yang, J.E. (2010). Application of the CFAST zone model to the Fire PSA. Nucl. Eng. Des. 240: 3571–3576, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.04.035.Search in Google Scholar

Najafi, B., Kassawara, R.P., Joglar-Biloch, F., and Khalil, Y. (2002). History of fire events in the US commercial nuclear industry. Int. Conf. Nucl. Eng. 35960: 381–388, https://doi.org/10.1115/ICONE10-22587.Search in Google Scholar

Salvi, U., Lattimer, B.Y., Alhadhrami, S., Wang, J., Sahin, E., and Duarte, J.P. (2022). Analysis of historic fires to determine most frequent challenging events. Prog. Nucl. Energy 146: 104146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104146.Search in Google Scholar

Schulz, T.L. (2006). Westinghouse AP1000 advanced passive plant. Nucl. Eng. Des. 236: 1547–1557, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.03.049.Search in Google Scholar

Shalabi, H. and Hadjisophocleous, G. (2018a). CANDU fire database. CNL Nucl. Rev. 8: 179–189, https://doi.org/10.12943/CNR.2017.00019.Search in Google Scholar

Shalabi, H. and Hadjisophocleous, G. (2018b). CANDU fire probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) model. CNL Nucl. Rev. 8: 97–108, https://doi.org/10.12943/CNR.2017.00020.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-03-20
Published Online: 2022-06-13
Published in Print: 2022-08-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow