This work is focused on the development and validation of models and methods for the simulation of wall boiling in nuclear engineering applications with the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code OpenFOAM. The new chtMultiRegionReactingTwoPhaseEulerFoam solver was developed based on the reactingTwoPhaseEulerFoam solver of OpenFOAM Foundation version 7. The solver is used for the simulation of two-phase flow under consideration of wall boiling and conjugate heat transfer (CHT) between solid structure and two-phase fluid regions. The Euler–Euler approach for two-phase flows was used. The heat flux during wall boiling was calculated with the help of the extended Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute wall heat flux partitioning model, in which the convective heat flux between solid wall and two-phase flow with high void fractions was also considered. The solver was validated against experimental data from the OECD/NEA PWR Subchannel and Bundle Tests benchmark. This Nuclear Power Energy Corporation (NUPEC) database provides data for different fuel assembly subchannel geometries at different thermal-hydraulic conditions. 10 experimental runs with different boundary conditions of the benchmark exercise I-1 were simulated with the chtMultiRegionReactingTwoPhaseEulerFoam solver. The solver showed good numerical stability in all examined cases, which captured different boiling regimes with up to cross-section averaged void fractions of 0.6. The results were compared with measured data for the averaged over the cross-section of the investigated geometry void fractions. Good agreement with experimental data was observed.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: This work has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology within reactor safety research project RS 1566: “CFD investigations of multiphysical phenomena within the framework of the safety assessment of existing reactor plants” and the German Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection based on decisions by the German Bundestag.
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
Anglart, H., Nylund, O., Kurul, N., and Podowski, M.Z. (1997). CFD prediction of flow and phase distribution in fuel assemblies with spacers. Nucl. Eng. Des. 177: 215–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-5493(97)00195-7.Search in Google Scholar
Burns, A., Frank, T., Hamill, I., and Shi, J.-M. (2004). The favre averaged drag model for turbulent dispersion in Eulerian multi-phase flows. In: Conf. on Multiphase Flow: ICMF 2004 392.Search in Google Scholar
Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., and Lewy, H. (1928). Über die partiellen Differenzengleichungen der mathematischen Physik. Math. Ann. 100: 32–74, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01448839.Search in Google Scholar
ESI OpenCFD (2019). OpenFOAM® v1906. ESI OpenCFD Ltd.Search in Google Scholar
Frank, T. (2005). Advances in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) of 3-dimensional gas–liquid multiphase flows. In: NAFEMS seminar “simulation of complex flows (CFD)”, pp. 1–18.Search in Google Scholar
Hori, K., Miyazaki, K., Kurosu, T., Sugiyama, S., Matsumoto, J., and Akiyama, Y. (1993). In bundle void fraction measurement of PWR fuel assembly. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), United States.Search in Google Scholar
Hristov, H. and Bals, C. (2018). Entwicklung und Validierung von Rechenmethoden zur Simulation von 2-Phasenströmungen und kritischen Wärmeströmen. Gesellschaft für Anlagen und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) gGmbH, Garching, Germany.Search in Google Scholar
Končar, B., Mavko, B., and Kljenak, I. (2008). Simulation of boiling flow experiments close to CHF with the Neptune_CFD code. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2008: 732158, https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/732158.Search in Google Scholar
Kurul, N. and Podowski, M.Z. (1991). On the modeling of multidimensional effects in boiling channels. In: ANS. proc. national heat transfer con. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 1991.Search in Google Scholar
Lavieville, J., Quemerais, E., Mimouni, S., Boucker, M., and Mechitoua, N. (2006). NEPTUNE CFD V1. 0 theory manual. Rapport interne EDF H-I81-2006-04377-EN. Rapport NEPTUNE Nept\_2004\_L 1(3).Search in Google Scholar
Lifante, C., Frank, T., and Burns, A. (2013). Wall boiling modeling extension towards critical heat flux. In: Proceedings of 15th international topical meeting on nuclear reactor thermal hydraulics, Pisa, Italy, May 12-17, 2013. NURETH-15.Search in Google Scholar
Menter, F.R. and Esch, T. (2001). Elements of industrial heat transfer prediction. In: 16th Brazilian Congr. of Mech. Eng. (Uberlandia, Brazil).Search in Google Scholar
Pacio, J., Wetzel, T., Doolard, H., Roelofs, F., and van Tichelen, K. (2015). Thermal-hydraulic study of the LBE-cooled fuel assembly in the MYRRHA reactor: experiments and simulations simulations. In: Proceedings of 16th international topical meeting on nuclear reactor thermal hydraulics, Chicago IL, USA, August 30–September 4, 2015. NURETH-16.Search in Google Scholar
Papukchiev, A., Grishchenko, D., and Kudinov, P. (2020). On the need for conjugate heat transfer modeling in transient CFD simulations. Nucl. Eng. Design 367: 110796, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110796.Search in Google Scholar
Ranz, W.E. and Marshall, W.R. (1952). Evaporation from drops. Chem. Eng. Prog. 48: 141–146.Search in Google Scholar
Rubin, A., Schoedel, A., Avramova, M., Utsuno, H., Bajorek, S., and Velazquez-Lozada, A. (2012). OECD/NRC benchmark Based on NUPEC PWR sub-channel and bundle test (PSBT) volume I: experimental Database and final problem specifications. Nuclear Energy Agency of the OECD (NEA), Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar
Sato, Y., Sadatomi, M., and Sekoguchi, K. (1981). Momentum and heat transfer in two-phase bubble flow—I. Theory. Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 7: 167–177, https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(81)90003-3.Search in Google Scholar
The OpenFOAM Foundation (2016). OpenFOAM version 4.0. The OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd, London, UK.Search in Google Scholar
The OpenFOAM Foundation (2017). OpenFOAM version 5.0. The OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd, London, UK.Search in Google Scholar
The OpenFOAM Foundation (2019). OpenFOAM version 7. The OpenFOAM Foundation Ltd, London, UK.Search in Google Scholar
Tomiyama, A., Celata, G.P., Hosokawa, S., and Yoshida, S. (2002a). Terminal velocity of single bubbles in surface tension force dominant regime. Int. J. Multiphas. Flow 28: 1497–1519, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00032-0.Search in Google Scholar
Tomiyama, A., Tamai, H., Zun, I., and Hosokawa, S. (2002b). Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows. Chem. Eng. Sci. 57: 1849–1858, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00085-4.Search in Google Scholar
Vegendla, P., Tentner, A., Shaver, D., Obabko, A., and Merzari, E. (2019). Development and validation of a conjugate heat transfer model for the two-phase CFD code NEK-2P, techreport, ANL-19/37, Argonne National Laboratory, Cass Avenue, USA.10.2172/1570458Search in Google Scholar
Wagner, W. and Kretzschmar, H.-J. (2008). International steam tables. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-540-74234-0Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X. (2019). Multiscale thermal hydraulic analysis of fuel assembly and system of SFR. Dissertation, Fakultät für Maschinenbau. Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Karlsruhe, Germany.Search in Google Scholar
Weis, J., Papukchiev, A., and Scheuerer, M. (2011). CFD analysis of boiling flow in PWR subchannel geometry of the OECD/NRC PSBT benchmark exercise I-1. In: Proceedings of the 14th international topical meeting on nuclear reactor Thermalhydraulics, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, September 25–30, 2011. NURETH-14.Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, X., Zong, Z., Jiang, Y., and Pan, Y. (2018). Numerical simulation of micro-bubble drag reduction of an axisymmetric body using OpenFOAM. J. Hydrodyn. 31: 900–910, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0118-2.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston