Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 26, 2018

De-Growth and Sustainable Development: Rethinking Human Rights Law and Poverty Alleviation

  • Wouter Vandenhole EMAIL logo

Abstract

In strong definitions, sustainable development has been argued to imply the prevalence of the environmental dimension over the economic one. The prioritization of the environmental (planet) and (arguably also the) social (people) pillar over the economic (profit) one may require a rather radical departure from assumptions of economic growth, including zero-growth or even de-growth, as argued in post-growth or ecological economics. This article asks the “what if” question. What if unorthodox, ecological economics got it right that post-growth or growth agnosticism is the new economic norm? What are the implications for human rights law and for the field of human rights and development? How could poverty alleviation look like in a growth agnostic scenario? The objective of this article is to draw out in an exploratory way some of the implications of strong definitions of sustainable development for human rights law and its relevance for development. At first, this intellectual exercise may look irrelevant or even cynical in the context of Africa, where more than 40% of the population, more than 300 million people, live in poverty. However, I see two major reasons for also debating in an African context the implications of growth agnosticism for human rights law. First, economic growth does not necessarily lead to economic development, let alone human development, and has typically come at a huge environmental cost. Alternative approaches that focus more directly on human well-being and ecological sustainability may help avoid a simple mimicking of the historical development of the global North. Second, ecological economics shifts the attention from growth to redistribution. The latter is a key challenge within Africa and within African countries, as well as from a global perspective. I examine how to factor in the consequences of post-growth or doughnut economics in the conceptual analysis of socio-economic human rights, and in the role of human rights law in development (cooperation), globally and nationally. In particular, I will try and set a research agenda on two issues that require further examination: the redefinition of obligations of international assistance and cooperation in human rights law and the reconceptualization of equality towards redistributive equality in human rights-based development cooperation interventions.

References

A. N. Author, Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 29 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, no. 4. (2011).10.1177/016934411102900411Search in Google Scholar

A. N. Author, Report Second Interagency Workshop on Implementing a Human Rights-Based Approach in the Context of UN Reform, Stamford, USA, 5–7 May 2003, Attachment 1: The Human Rights Based Approach to Development Cooperation Towards a Common Understanding among UN Agencies, available at: <https://undg.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/6959-The_Human_Rights_Based_Approach_to_Development_Cooperation_Towards_a_Common_Understanding_among_UN.pdf>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Alston, P., Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals, 27 Human Rights Quarterly, no. 3 (2005).10.1353/hrq.2005.0030Search in Google Scholar

Alston, P., Extreme Inequality as the Antithesis to Human Rights, 27 October 2015a, available at:<https://www.opendemocracy.net/openglobalrights/philip-alston/extreme-inequality-as-antithesis-of-human-rights>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Alston, P., Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/29/31 of 27 May 2015b.Search in Google Scholar

Andreassen, B. and G. Crawford (eds.), Human Rights, Power and Civic Action. Comparative Analyses of Struggles for Rights in Developing Countries, Routledge Research in Human Rights (London: Routledge, 2013).10.4324/9780203525821Search in Google Scholar

Balakrishnan, R. and J. Heintz, How Inequality Threatens All Human Rights, 29 October 2015, available at: <https://www.openglobalrights.org/how-inequality-threatens-all-humans-rights/?lang=English>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Balakrishnan, R., J. Heintz and D. Elson, Rethinking Economic Policy for Social Justice: The Radical Potential of Human Rights (London & New York: Routledge, 2016).10.4324/9781315737911Search in Google Scholar

Bhuta, N., “The Frontiers of Extraterritoriality-Human Rights Law as Global Law”. in N. Bhuta (ed.), The Frontiers of Human Rights: Extraterritoriality and Its Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769279.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bosselmann, K., A Vulnerable Environment: Contextualising Law with Sustainability, 2 Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, no. 1 (2011).10.4337/jhre.2011.01.03Search in Google Scholar

Darrow, M. and A. Tomas, Power, Capture, and Conflict: A Call for Human Rights Accountability in Development Cooperation, 27 Human Rights Quarterly, no. 2 (2005).10.1353/hrq.2005.0015Search in Google Scholar

De Feyter, K., The Human Rights Approach to Development (Antwerp: Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, 1992).Search in Google Scholar

De Feyter, K., Towards a Framework Convention on the Right to Development (Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2013), available at: <http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/genf/09892.pdf>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

De Schutter, O., A. Eide, A. Khalfan, M. Orellana, M. Salomon and I. Seiderman, Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 34 Human Rights Quarterly, no. 4 (2012).10.1353/hrq.2012.0063Search in Google Scholar

Fredman, S., Substantive Equality Revisited, Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 70/2014 (University of Oxford, 2014), available at: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=2510287>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Fredman, S., Emerging from the Shadows: Substantive Equality and Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 16 Human Rights Law Review, no. 2 (2016).10.1093/hrlr/ngw001Search in Google Scholar

Gondek, M., The Reach of Human Rights in a Globalising World: Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2009).Search in Google Scholar

Gready, P. and J. Ensor (eds.), Reinventing Development? Translating Rights-Based Approaches from Theory into Practice (London: Zed Books, 2005).Search in Google Scholar

Kallis, G., C. Kerschner and J. Martinez-Alier, The Economics of Degrowth, 84 Ecological Economics (2012).10.2307/j.ctv5cg82g.5Search in Google Scholar

Kerschner, C., Economic De-Growth Vs. Steady-State Economy, 18 Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 6 (2010).10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.019Search in Google Scholar

Kim, R.E. and K. Bosselmann, Operationalizing Sustainable Development: Ecological Integrity as a Grundnorm of International Law, 24 Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law, no. 2 (2015).Search in Google Scholar

Markus, J., What Is the Use of a Human Right to Development – Legal Pluralism, Participation, and a Tentative Rehabilitation, 41 Journal of Law and Society, no. 3 (2014).10.1111/j.1467-6478.2014.00674.xSearch in Google Scholar

Martínez-Alier, J., Socially Sustainable Economic De-Growth, 40 Development and Change, no. 6 (2009).10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01618.xSearch in Google Scholar

Martínez-Alier, J., U. Pascual, F.-D. Vivien and E. Zaccai, Sustainable De-Growth: Mapping the Context, Criticisms and Future Prospects of an Emergent Paradigm, 69 Ecological Economics, no. 9 (2010).10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017Search in Google Scholar

Max-Neef, M., Economic Growth and Quality of Life: A Threshold Hypothesis, 15 Ecological Economics, no. 2 (1995).10.1016/0921-8009(95)00064-XSearch in Google Scholar

Milanovic, M., Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696208.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Moyne, S., Human Rights and the Age of Inequality, 27 October 2015, available at: <https://www.opendemocracy.net/openglobalrights/samuel-moyn/human-rights-and-age-of-inequality>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

OHCHR, Frequently Asked Questions on a Human Rights-Based Approach to Development Cooperation (New York and Geneva: OHCHR, 2006).Search in Google Scholar

Perotti, E., Zero-Growth Could Be the New Long-Term Normal in Developed Economies: Six Charts that Explain Why, 20 December 2016, available at: <https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/12/zero-growth-could-be-the-new-long-term-normal-in-developed-economies-six-charts-that-explain-why/>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Rajagopal, B., International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).10.1017/CBO9780511494079Search in Google Scholar

Raworth, K., A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can We Live within the Doughnut?, Oxfam Discussion Papers (2012), available at: <https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/dp-a-safe-and-just-space-for-humanity-130212-en.pdf>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Raworth, K., The Doughnut of Social and Planetary Boundaries (2017a), available at: <https://www.kateraworth.com/doughnut/>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Raworth, K., Doughnut Economics. Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist (London: Random House Business Books, 2017b).Search in Google Scholar

Raworth, K., Doughnut Economics, available at: <https://www.humansandnature.org/economy-kate-raworth>, accessed 26 March 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Rockström, J., W. Steffen and K. Noone, Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity, 14 Ecology and Society, no. 2 (2009).10.5751/ES-03180-140232Search in Google Scholar

Salomon, M., Legal Cosmopolitanism and the Normative Contribution of the Right to Development (London: London School of Economics and Political Science, 2008), available at: <http://www.lse.ac.uk/law/working-paper-series/2007-08/WPS2008-16-Salomon.pdf>, accessed 26 March 2018.10.2139/ssrn.1272582Search in Google Scholar

Salomon, M.E., Global Responsibility for Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199284429.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

UNDP, Human Development Report 2013. The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World (New York: UNDP, 2013).Search in Google Scholar

UNDP, Human Development Report 2016. Human Development for Everyone (New York: UNDP, 2016).Search in Google Scholar

UNGA, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2015), UN Doc. A/RES/70/1 of 21 October 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Vandenbogaerde, A., The Right to Development in International Human Rights Law: A Call for Its Dissolution, 31 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, no. 2 (2013).10.1177/016934411303100204Search in Google Scholar

Vandenhole, W., “The Limits of Human Rights Law in Human Development”. in E. Claes, W. Devroe and B. Keirsbilck (eds.), Facing the Limits of the Law (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2009).10.1007/978-3-540-79856-9_20Search in Google Scholar

Vandenhole, W., Beyond Territoriality: The Maastricht Principles on Extra-Territorial Obligations in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 29 Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, no. 4 (2011).10.1177/016934411102900402Search in Google Scholar

Vandenhole, W., “Obligations and Responsibility in a Plural and Diverse Duty-Bearer Human Rights Regime”, in W. Vandenhole (ed.), Challenging Territoriality in Human Rights Law: Building Blocks for a Plural and Diverse Duty-Bearer Regime, Routledge Research in Human Rights Law (London: Routledge, 2015a).10.4324/9781315756035Search in Google Scholar

Vandenhole, W., “Shared Responsibility of Non-State Actors: A Human Rights Perspective”. in N. Gal-Or, C. Ryngaert and M. Noortmann (eds.), Responsibilities of the Non-State Actor in Armed Conflict and the Market Place: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings (Leiden: Brill, 2015b).Search in Google Scholar

Vandenhole, W. and W. Benedek, “Extraterritorial Human Rights Obligations and the North-South Divide”. in M. Langford, et al. (eds.), Global Justice, State Duties: The Extraterritorial Scope of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013).10.1017/CBO9781139002974.017Search in Google Scholar

Vandenhole, W. and P. Gready, Failures and Successes of Human Rights-Based Approaches to Development: Towards a Change Perspective, 32 Nordic Journal of Human Rights, no. 4 (2014).10.1080/18918131.2015.957458Search in Google Scholar

Wilde, R., “Dilemmas in Promoting Global Economic Justice through Human Rights Law”. in N. Bhuta (ed.), The Frontiers of Human Rights: Extraterritoriality and Its Challenges (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769279.003.0005Search in Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), available at: <http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-04-26
Published in Print: 2018-06-26

© 2018 Law and Development Review

Downloaded on 11.12.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ldr-2018-0033/html
Scroll to top button