Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 24, 2021

Universities as Engines of Development

Shubha Ghosh

Abstract

The Bayh–Dole Act was enacted in the United States in 1980 to promote economic development and growth at regional and national levels. A key engine is research generated within universities. This article addresses the question of how universities can serve as engines of development. Drawing on Cooter and Shaeffer’s work on law and development, specifically what they call the double trust problem, this article shows how the Bayh–Dole Act was justified as resolving the double trust problem arising from lack of property rights in university research. This article presents the argument that this goal of the Bayh–Dole Act ignores how universities solve another dimension of the double trust problem, namely the generation of human capital. The author examines the theoretical justifications for the Bayh–Dole Act and universities and the empirical policy literature assessing university patenting and commercialization in the United States, South Africa, and India.


Corresponding author: Shubha Ghosh, Syracuse, NY, USA, E-mail:

References

Brown, Christopher. “Ayresian Technology, Schumpeterian Innovation, and the Bayh–Dole Act.” 43 Journal of Economic Issues, no. 2 (2009). Search in Google Scholar

Cooter, Robert D., and Hans-Bernd Schaefer. Solomon’s Knot: How Law Can End the Poverty of Nations (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 2012). Search in Google Scholar

Dai, Yixin, David Popp, and Stuart Bretschneider. Institutions and Intellectual Property: The Influence of Institutional Forces on University Patenting, 24 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, no. 3 (2005). Search in Google Scholar

Geary, William L., Protecting the Patent Rights of Small Businesses: Does the Bayh–Dole Act Live Up to Its Promise?, 22 Public Contract Law Journal, no. 1 (1992). Search in Google Scholar

Ghosh, Shubha, “Bayh–Dole beyond Patents,” in Jacob Rooksby (ed.) Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Gotkin, Joel, “Bayh–Dole Moving Forward:: Ownership Concerns and the Stanford v Roche Case,” in The United States Bayh–Dole Act and Its Effect of University Technology Transfer, MIPLC Studies, no. 18 (Munich: Nomos, 2012). Search in Google Scholar

Gotkin, Joel, “Perceived Successes and Shortfalls of the Bayh–Dole Act,” in The United States Bayh–Dole Act and Its Effect of University Technology Transfer, MIPLC Studies, no. 18 (Munich: Nomos, 2012). Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Bronwyn, Christian Helmers, Mark Rogers, and Vania, Sena. The Choice between Formal and Informal Intellectual Property: A Review, 52 Journal of Economic Literature, no. 2 (2014). Search in Google Scholar

Hughes, Thomas P. American Genesis: A Century of Invention Ad Technological Enthusiasm, 1870-1970 (Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press 1989). Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Richard and Marie Thursby, Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions, 91 The American Economic Review, no. 1 (2001). Search in Google Scholar

Lieberwitz, Risa L., Confronting the Privatization and Commercialization of Academic Research: An Analysis of Social Implications at the Local, National, and Global Levels, 12 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, no. 1 (2005). Search in Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz, The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 1962). Search in Google Scholar

Mowery, David C. and Arvids A. Ziedonis, Numbers, Quality, and Entry: How Has the Bayh–Dole Act Affected U.S. University Patenting and Licensing?, 1 Innovation Policy and the Economy (2000). Search in Google Scholar

Newman, John Henry, The Idea of a University (Notre Dame, Indiana: Notre Dame University Press 1982). Search in Google Scholar

O’Mara, Margaret, Cities of Knowledge: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 2015). Search in Google Scholar

Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore, Addressing the Green Patent Global Deadlock Through Bayh–Dole Reform, 119 The Yale Law Journal, no. 7 (2010). Search in Google Scholar

Rai, Arti K., and Rebecca S. Eisenberg, Bayh–Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine, 66 Law and Contemporary Problems, no. 1/2 (2003). Search in Google Scholar

Rooksby, Jacob H. (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Sidebottom, Diane M., Updating the Bayh–Dole Act: Keeping the Federal Government on the Cutting Edge, 30 Public Contract Law Journal, no. 2 (2001). Search in Google Scholar

Thursby, Jerry, and Marie Thursby, University Licensing: Harnessing or Tarnishing Faculty Research?, 10 Innovation Policy and the Economy, no. 1 (2010). Search in Google Scholar

Veysey, Laurence R., The Emergence of the American University (Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press 1965). Search in Google Scholar

Warshaw, Jarrett B., “University as Knowledge-Based Enterpriise: Organizational Design and Technology Transfer”, in Rooksby, Jacob H. (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Weber, William L., and Yin, Xia, The Productivity of Nanobiotechnology Research and Education in U.S. Universities, 93 American Journal of Agricultural Economics, no. 4 (2011). Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-06-24
Published in Print: 2021-06-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston