Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Saur January 21, 2021

Evaluating Public Library Events using a Combination of Methods

  • Jan Pisanski ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Katarina Švab ORCID logo
From the journal Libri

Abstract

Public libraries hold an increasing number of events, where they face the very important, but often neglected, challenge of evaluation. This paper presents various studies performed to evaluate events for adults at the largest public library in Slovenia, Mestna knjižnica Ljubljana (Ljubljana City Library). A combination of methods was used: content analysis of library website and promotional brochures, interviews with both attendees and librarians, observation of events and a relatively large survey. Additionally, based on this research, seven personas representing typical user groups of events for adults were developed. While attendees were generally highly satisfied with the existing events, our research found room for improvement, especially regarding planning for particular user groups, scheduling and topical diversity of events and promotion aimed at both existing and potential visitors. Based on this research, Ljubljana City Library prepared guidelines for their future events for adults. Additionally, the general outline of the evaluation should be of benefit to any library regardless of type, size or location.


Corresponding author: Jan Pisanski, Department of Library and Information Science and Book Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: P5-0361(B)

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding No. P5-0361(B)).

References

Aabø, S., R. Audunson, and A. Vårheim. 2010. “How Do Public Libraries Function as Meeting Places?” Library & Information Science Research 32 (1): 16–26.10.1016/j.lisr.2009.07.008Search in Google Scholar

American Library Association. 2014. National Impact of Library Public Programs Assessment: White Paper. American Library Association. https://nilppa.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/NILPPA_White_Paper_FINAL_web.pdf (accessed July 1, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Bibsist online. 2018. Statistični Podatki O Knjižnicah [Statistical Data on Libraries]. https://bibsist.nuk.uni-lj.si/statistika/index.php (accessed June 10, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

De la Peña McCook, K., and J. S. Bossaller. 2018. Introduction to Public Librarianship. Chicago: American Library Association.Search in Google Scholar

Demeter, M., and H. K. Holmes. 2019. Library Programming Made Easy: A Practical Guide for Librarians. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Fowler, D. 2016. “The Library Card.” The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/03/the-library-card/426888/ (accessed May 31, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Goodman, V. D. 2011. “Applying Ethnographic Research Methods in Library and Information Settings.” Libri 61 (1): 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.2011.001.Search in Google Scholar

Hassenzahl, M. 2007. “The Hedonic/pragmatic Model of User Experience.” In Towards a UX Manifesto - Proceedings of a Cost294-Affiliated Workshop on HCI 2008, edited by E. Law, A. Vermeeren, M. Hassenzahl, and M. Blythe, 10–4.Search in Google Scholar

Koontz, C., and B. Gubbin, eds. 2010. IFLA Public Library Service Guidelines. Berlin/Munich: De Gruyter Saur.Search in Google Scholar

Lear, B. W. 2013. Adult Programs in the Library. Chicago: ALA Editions.Search in Google Scholar

Leckie, G. J., and J. Hopkins. 2002. “The Public Place of Central Libraries: Findings from Toronto and Vancouver.” The Library Quarterly 72 (3): 326–72, https://doi.org/10.1086/lq.72.3.40039762.Search in Google Scholar

Lenstra, N. 2017. “Let’s Move! Fitness Programming in Public Libraries.” Public Library Quarterly 37 (1): 61–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2017.1316150.Search in Google Scholar

Luo, L. 2018. “Health Information Programming in Public Libraries: A Content Analysis.” Public Library Quarterly 37 (3): 233–47, https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1498704.Search in Google Scholar

MacKellar, P. H. 2016. Meeting Community Needs: A Practical Guide for Librarians. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Mainka, A., S. Hartmann, L. Orszullok, I. Peters, A. Stallmann, and W. G. Stock. 2013. “Public Libraries in the Knowledge Society: Core Services of Libraries in Informational World Cities.” Libri 63 (4): 295–319, https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0024.Search in Google Scholar

Massis, B. 2018. “The User Experience (UX) in Libraries.” Information and Learning Science 119 (3–4): 241–4, https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-12-2017-0132.Search in Google Scholar

Matthews, J. R. 2013. Research-based Planning for Public Libraries: Increasing Relevance in the Digital Age. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.Search in Google Scholar

Merčun, T., and M. Žumer. 2014. “Dimensions of User Experience and Reaction Cards.” In The Emergence of Digital Libraries – Research and Practices: 16th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2014; Proceedings, edited by K. Tuamsuk, 365–70. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-12823-8_38Search in Google Scholar

Merčun, T., and M. Žumer. 2017. “Exploring the Influences on Pragmatic and Hedonic Aspects of User Experience.” Information Research 22 (1): 1–8. http://informationr.net/ir/22-1/colis/colis1621.html (accessed June 16, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Merčun-Kariž, T. 2018. “Obiskovalci Prireditev Za Odrasle in Njihova Izkušnja: Analiza Anket, April 2018 [Visitors of Events for Adults and Their User Experience: a Survey Analysis, April 2018].” https://www.mklj.si/images/dokumenti/splosno/o_nas/informacije_javnega_znacaja/Obiskovalci_prireditev_za_odrasle_in_njihova_izkusnja_-_analiza_anket.pdf (accessed June 16, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Mulholland, J. 2011. “Libraries Now Offering Books and workouts.” Governing: The States and Localities. http://www.governing.com/topics/health-human-services/Libraries-Now-Offering-Books-and-Workouts.html (accessed May 3, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

OCLC and American Library Association. 2018. From Awareness to Funding: Voter Perceptions and Support of Public Libraries in 2018. https://doi.org/10.25333/C3M92X (accessed May 21, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Pisanski, J., and K. Švab. 2018. “The Curious Case of Travel-Related Events in Public Libraries.” Libellarium 1 (1), https://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v1i1.314.Search in Google Scholar

Powell, R. R., and L. S. Connaway. 2004. Basic Research Methods for Librarians. Westport, London: Libraries Unlimited.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, A. 2018. Designing Adult Services: Strategies for Better Serving Your Community. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.Search in Google Scholar

Robertson, D. A. 2005. Cultural Programming for Libraries: Linking Libraries, Communities, and Culture. Chicago: ALA Editions.Search in Google Scholar

Rohr, L. 2016. “Zumba, 3-D Printers, Fishing Pole Rentals Among Unique Library offerings.” Daily Herald, http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20160710/news/160719943/ (accessed May 23, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Sabo, R. M. 2017. “Lifelong Learning and Library Programming for the Third Agers.” Library Review 66 (1–2): 39–48, https://doi.org/10.1108/LR-08-2016-0065.Search in Google Scholar

Smernice. 2019. Smernice Za Prireditve Za Odrasle V MKL [Guidelines for Events for Adults at MKL]. https://www.mklj.si/images/dokumenti/splosno/o_nas/informacije_javnega_znacaja/SMERNICE_ZA_PRIREDITVE_ZA_ODRASLE.pdf (accessed May 13, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Smernice. 2020. Smernice Za Evalvacijo Prireditev in Izkušnje Obiskovalcev [Guidelines for Evaluation of Events and User Experience]. https://www.mklj.si/images/dokumenti/splosno/o_nas/informacije_javnega_znacaja/Smernice_evalvacija_prireditev_izkusenj_obiskovalcev.pdf (accessed June 10, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Stevenson, S. C. 2012. Fundraising for Libraries: How to Plan Profitable Special Events. Sioux City: Author.10.1002/9781118703786Search in Google Scholar

Wildemuth, B. M. 2017. “Existing Documents and Artefacts as Data.” In Application of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, edited by B. M. Wildemuth, 165–72. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, L. 2014. “Library Programming: Don’t Just Follow the Crowd.” Illinois Library Association Reporter 32: 18–20. https://www.ila.org/content/documents/Reporter_1014.pdf (accessed May 10, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-01-21
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.12.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/libri-2019-0149/html
Scroll to top button