Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Saur August 30, 2021

Some Thoughts Evoked by Peter Lor, Bradley Wiles, and Johannes Britz, “Re-thinking Information Ethics: Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Librarians in the COVID-19 Era,” in LIBRI, March 2021

Thomas Froehlich ORCID logo
From the journal Libri


The paper offers some thoughts prompted by the research paper published by Peter Lor, Bradley Wiles, and Johannes Britz, “Re-Thinking Information Ethics: Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Librarians in the COVID-19 Era,” in LIBRI, March 2021. It highlights two significant contributions, an analysis of the misinformation in the COVID-19 pandemic and the notion of alethic rights, the right of truth of patrons based on the work of D’Agostini. This reflection then situates the COVID-19 misinformation campaign within the broader disinformation ecology within which it exists. While it agrees that alethic rights are an important ethical framework, it wonders whether it practically advances work beyond that libraries and librarians are already doing, e.g., in collection decisions, approaches to reference questions, or library programming. It looks at the debate between John Swan and Noel Peattie on the inclusion of books representing outright lies in the collection (e.g., Holocaust denial). It then contrasts a right to information and authorities propagating and validating that information with a right to misinformation and authorities for propagating and validating that misinformation that exists within disinformation ecologies. The problem of truth, its authorities and its context appears to be more complicated than an appeal to alethic truths: for example, liberals and conservatives differ on the meaning of a rational consensus on contentious political matters, such as climate change. Given the dire consequences of misinformation on democracies and public health, an appeal to professional neutrality is woefully inadequate. There must be proactive resistance, if not outright repudiation.

Corresponding author: Thomas Froehlich, School of Information, Kent State University, Kent, USA, E-mail:


Benkler, Y., R. Faris, and H. Roberts. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bump, P. 2020. “Analysis | The Stunning Extent to Which Trumpism is Centered Among Fox News-Watching Republicans.” Washington Post. (accessed November 13, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Froehlich, T. J. 1992. “Ethical Considerations of Information Professionals.” In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, edited by M. Williams, 291–324. Medford: Learned Information.Search in Google Scholar

Froehlich, T. J. 2020. “A Disinformation-Misinformation Ecology: The Case of Trump.” In Fake News is Bad News - Hoaxes, Half-Truths and the Nature of Today’s Journalism. London: IntechOpen. Also available at .Search in Google Scholar

Ingraham, C. 2019. “Why Conservatives Might be More Likely to Fall for Fake News.” Washington Post. (accessed October 26, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Kahan, D., D. Braman, and H. Jenkins-Smith. 2011. “Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (2): 147–74, in Google Scholar

Library Bill of Rights. 2021. American Library Association. (accessed March 16, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Lor, P., B. Wiles, and J. Britz. 2021. “Re-thinking Information Ethics: Truth, Conspiracy Theories, and Librarians in the COVID-19 Era.” International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies (LIBRI) 71 (1): 1–14, doi: in Google Scholar

Mooney, C. 2011. “The Science of Why We Don’t Believe Science.” Mother Jones. (accessed August 22, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Salvanto, A., J. De Pinto, F. Backus, and K. Khanna. 2021. Many Would Get the COVID-19 Vaccine, but Hesitancy Remains - CBS News Poll. (accessed March 16, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Smith, T. 2019. Foxocracy: Inside the Network’s Playbook of Tribal Warfare. New York: Diversion Books.Search in Google Scholar

Swan, J., and N. Peattie. 1989. The Freedom to Lie: A Debate about Democracy. Jefferson: McFarland & Co., Inc. Publishers. Reissued in 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, P. 1983. Second-hand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. Westport: Greenwood Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-08-30
Published in Print: 2021-09-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston