Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 23, 2018

The expectation mismatch effect in accentedness perception of Asian and Caucasian non-native speakers of English

Ksenia Gnevsheva
From the journal Linguistics


Previous research on speech perception has found an effect of ethnicity, such that the same audio clip may be rated more accented when presented with an Asian face (Rubin, Donald L. 1992. Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33(4). 511–531. doi: 10.1007/bf00973770). However, most previous work has concentrated on Asian non-native English speakers, and Caucasian speakers remain under-explored. In this study, listeners carried out an accentedness rating task using stimuli from first language Korean, German, and English speakers in 3 conditions: audio only, video only, and audiovisual. Korean speakers received similar accentedness ratings regardless of condition, but German speakers were rated significantly less accented in the video condition and more accented in the audiovisual condition than the audio one. This result is explained as an expectation mismatch effect, whereby, when the listeners saw a Caucasian speaker they did not expect to hear a foreign accent, but if they actually heard one it was made more salient by their expectation to the contrary.


Babel, Molly & Jamie Russell. 2015. Expectations and speech intelligibility. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 137(5). 2823–2833. Search in Google Scholar

Barr, Dale J., Roger Levy, C. Christoph Scheepers & Harry J. Tily. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3). 255–278. Search in Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1). 32–64. doi: 10.1215/00031283-2007-002. Search in Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. Sociolinguistics and perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6). 377–389. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818x.2010.00201.x Search in Google Scholar

Drager, Katie. 2010. Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(7). 473–480. Search in Google Scholar

Gnevsheva, Ksenia. 2015. Acoustic analysis in Accent of Non-Native English (ANNE) corpus. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(2). 256–267. Search in Google Scholar

Han-Gyol, Yi, Rajka Smiljanic & Bharath Chandrasekaran. 2014. The neural processing of foreign-accented speech and its relationship to listener bias. Frontiers in human neuroscience 8. 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00768 Search in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer & Katie Drager. 2010. Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48(4). 865–892. Search in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Aaron Nolan & K. Katie Drager. 2006a. From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review 23(3). 351–379. doi: 10.1515/tlr.2006.014. Search in Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer, Paul Warren & Katie Drager. 2006b. Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34(4). 458–484. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001. Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Keith Johnson & John W Mullennix eds., Talker variability in speech processing, 145–165. San Diego: Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, Keith. 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34. 485–499. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.004. Search in Google Scholar

Kang, Okim & Donald L Rubin. 2009. Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28. 441–456. Search in Google Scholar

Kraut, Rachel & Stefanie Wulff. 2013. Foreign-accented speech perception ratings: A multifactorial case study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 34(3). 249–263. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2013.767340. Search in Google Scholar

Levi, Susannah V., Stephen J Winters & David B Pisoni. 2007. Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(4). 2327–2338. Search in Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Hoboken: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

McGowan, Kevin B. 2015. Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0023830914565191. Search in Google Scholar

Niedzielski, Nancy. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1). 62–85. doi: 10.1177/0261927x99018001005. Search in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2003. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46(2-3). 115–154. Search in Google Scholar

Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]. 2012. Retrieved from Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, Donald L. 1992. Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33(4). 511–531. doi: 10.1007/bf00973770. Search in Google Scholar

Strand, Elizabeth A. 2000. Gender stereotype effects on speech processing. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Dissertation. Search in Google Scholar

Vishnevskaya, Galina. 2008. Foreign accent: Phonetic and communicative hazards. In Ewa Waniek-Klimczak ed., Issues in accents of English, 235–251. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

Yi, Ha-Gyol, Jasmine E.B. Phelps, Rajka Smiljanic & Bharath Chandrasekaran. 2013. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134(5). 387–393. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-05-23
Published in Print: 2018-06-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston