Chains of influence in Himalayan grammars: Models and interrelations shaping descriptions of Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2015. The art of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2018. The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford handbooks in linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Akita, Kimi & Prashant Pardeshi (eds.). 2019. Ideophones, mimetics and expressives (Iconicity in language and literature 16). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.16Search in Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix. 1992. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18. 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90048-g.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 2015. Dimensions of morphological complexity. In Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown & Greville Corbett (eds.), Understanding and measuring morphological complexity, 11–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723769.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Aussant, Emilie. 2017. La grammaire sanskrite étendue: Etat des Lieux. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 39(2). 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1051/hel/2017390201.Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 1997. Spatial operations in deixis, cognition, and culture: Where to orient oneself in Belhare. In Jan Nuyts & Eric Pederson (eds.), Language and conceptualization, 46–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139086677.003Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 1999. Nominalization and focus in some Kiranti languages. In Yogendra Yadava & Warren Glover (eds.), Topics in Nepalese linguistics, 271–296. Kathmandu: Royal Nepal Academy.Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar. 2003. Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 79(4). 708–736. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0205.Search in Google Scholar

Bickel, Balthasar & Martin Gaenszle (eds.). 1999. Himalayan space: Cultural horizons and practices. Zürich: Völkerkundemuseum der Universität Zürich.Search in Google Scholar

Bowern, Claire. 2008. Linguistic fieldwork: A practical guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230590168Search in Google Scholar

Bradley, David. 1997. Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, 1–72. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Caplow, Nancy. 2017. Inference and deferred evidence in Tibetan. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan Hill (eds.), Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 225–253. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110473742-008Search in Google Scholar

Caughley, Ross C. 2002. Ideophones in Chepang: Their nature and sub-categorisation. Gipan: Tribhuvan University Papers in Linguistics 2(May). 16–24.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace & Johanna Nichols. 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Colombat, Bernard. 2019a. Accidens. In Bernard Colombat & Aimée Lahaussois (eds.), Histoire des parties du discours (Orbis Supplementa 46), 49–54. Leuven: Peeters.10.2307/j.ctv1q26rqjSearch in Google Scholar

Colombat, Bernard. 2019b. Accident. In Bernard Colombat & Aimée Lahaussois (eds.), Histoire des parties du discours (Orbis Supplementa 46), 54–56. Leuven: Peeters.10.2307/j.ctv1q26rqjSearch in Google Scholar

Colombat, Bernard & Aimée Lahaussois (eds.). 2019a. Histoire des parties du discours (Orbis Supplementa 46). Leuven: Peeters.10.2307/j.ctv1q26rqjSearch in Google Scholar

Colombat, Bernard & Aimée Lahaussois. 2019b. Les parties du discours ou classes de mots. In Bernard Colombat & Aimée Lahaussois (eds.), Histoire des parties du discours (Orbis Supplementa 46), 24–45. Leuven: Peeters.10.2307/j.ctv1q26rqjSearch in Google Scholar

Colombat, Bernard, Jean-Marie Fournier & Christian Puech. 2010. Histoire des idées sur le langage et les langues. Paris: Klincksiek.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard & Norval Smith. 1977. Lingua descriptive studies: questionnaire. Lingua 42(1). 11–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(77)90063-8.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 2016. Thoughts on language: Specific and crosslinguistic entities. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0016.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52.10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2002. Relativization and nominalization in Bodic. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special session on Tibeto-Burman and Southeast Asian linguistics, 55–72. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v28i2.1039Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 2012. Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 529–564. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0020.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Nijmegen: Radboud University Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. 2018. Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa 3(1). 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.444.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. Utrecht: LOT.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew. 2006. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Felix Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: Issues in grammar writing, 207–234. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://Wals.Info (accessed on 16 February 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Ebert, Karen. 1997a. Camling (Chamling). (Languages of the world/materials 103). Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Ebert, Karen. 1997b. A grammar of Athpare. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Ebert, Karen. 2000. Camling texts and glossary. Languages of the world/text collections 11. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & Alan Dench. 2006. Introduction: Catching language. In Felix Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing, 1–40. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Floyd, Simeon, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.). 2016. Egophoricity. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

François, Jacques. 2013. Deux pionniers de la formalisation en morphologie linguistique au XIXe siècle: August Schleicher et Hugo Schuchardt. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 35(1). 111–142.Search in Google Scholar

Garrett, Edward J. 2001. Evidentiality and assertion in Tibetan. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Gawne, Lauren. 2013. Lamjung Yolmo copulas in use: Evidentiality, reported speech and questions. Melbourne: University of Melbourne Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Gawne, Lauren. 2016. A sketch grammar of Lamjung Yolmo. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Gawne, Lauren & Nathan Hill (eds.). 2017. Evidential systems of Tibetan languages. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110473742Search in Google Scholar

Gawne, Lauren, Barbara Kelly, Andrea Berez-Kroeker & Tyler, Heston. 2017. Putting practice into words: The state of data and methods transparency in grammatical descriptions. Language Documentation & Conservation 11. 157–189.Search in Google Scholar

Genetti, Carol. 1990. A descriptive and historical account of the Dolakha Newari dialect. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Genetti, Carol. 1994. A descriptive and historical account of the Dolakha Newari dialect. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Search in Google Scholar

Genetti, Carol. 2007. A grammar of Dolakha Newar. (Mouton grammar library 40). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198812Search in Google Scholar

Genetti, Carol. 2011. Basic linguistic theory review. Language 87(4). 899–904. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2011.0089.Search in Google Scholar

Genetti, Carol. 2014. Walking the line: Balancing description, argumentation and theory in academic grammar writing. In Toshihide Nakayama & Keren Rice (eds.), The art and practice of grammar writing (Language documentation and conservation special publication 8), 121–134. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Genetti, Carol, Alexander Coupe, Ellen Bartee, Kristine Hildebrandt & You-Jing Lin. 2008. Syntactic aspects of nominalization in five Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayan area. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 31(2). 97–143.Search in Google Scholar

Grimes, Barbara (ed.), Joseph Grimes & Richard Pittman (consulting eds.). 1988. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 11th edn. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 2018. Ideophones and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107706897Search in Google Scholar

Hale, Austin. 1980. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics 7. 95–106.Search in Google Scholar

Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath. 2019. Glottolog 3.4. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. http://glottolog.org (accessed 13 May 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Hargreaves, David. 2018. “Am I blue?”: Privileged access constraints in Kathmandu Newar. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, 79–107. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.118.02harSearch in Google Scholar

Hari, Anna Maria. 2010. Yohlmo grammar sketch. SIL International.Search in Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, Kristine. 2004. A grammar and glossary of the Manange language. In Carol Genetti (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, 7–192. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. 2012. “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 389–433. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John Ohala (eds.). 1994. Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511751806Search in Google Scholar

Hodgson, Brian Houghton. 1857. Vayu vocabulary. Journal of The Asiatic Society of Bengal 26. 372–485.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Barbara. 2004. A grammar and glossary of the Sherpa language. In Carol Genetti (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, 193–321. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, Barbara. 2018. Interaction of speaker knowledge and volitionality in Sherpa. In Simeon Floyd, Elisabeth Norcliffe & Lila San Roque (eds.), Egophoricity, 139–152. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.118.04kelSearch in Google Scholar

King, John. 2009. A grammar of Dhimal. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Lahaussois, Aimée. 2016. Where have all the interjections gone? A look into the place of interjections in contemporary grammars of endangered languages. In Carlos Assunção, Gonçalo Fernandes & Rolf Kemmler (eds.), Tradition and innovation in the history of linguistics: Contributions from the 13th international conference on the history of the language sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, 25–29 August 2014. Münster: Nodus.Search in Google Scholar

Lahaussois, Aimée. 2017. Ideophones in Khaling. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 40(2). 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltba.17005.lah.Search in Google Scholar

Lahaussois, Aimée. 2019. Les parties du discours dans les manuels de description linguistique. In Jean-Marie Fournier, Aimée Lahaussois & Valérie Raby (eds.), Grammaticalia: Hommage à Bernard Colombat, 27–34. Lyon: ENS Editions.10.4000/books.enseditions.12189Search in Google Scholar

Lahaussois, Aimée. 2020. The shapes of verbal paradigms in Kiranti languages. Faits de Langues 50(2). 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-05002010.Search in Google Scholar

Lallot, Jean. 2019. Parapomenon. In Bernard Colombat & Aimée Lahaussois (eds.), Histoire des parties du discours (Orbis supplementa 46), 45–48. Leuven: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert-Brétière, Renée. 2020. The Bloomfieldian heritage in Algonquian linguistics: The verbal complex in Innu. Faits de Langues 50(2). 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-05002012.Search in Google Scholar

Lazard, Gilbert. 1999. Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic Typology 3. 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1999. Documentation of endangered languages: A priority task for linguistics. In Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität (ASSidUE, 1).Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian & Elena Maslova. 2004. Grammaticography. In Geert Booij, Christian Lehmann, Joachim Mugdan & Stavros Skopeteas (eds.), Morphologie: Ein Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, vol. 2, 1857–1882. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110172782.2.20.1857Search in Google Scholar

Matisoff, James. 1972. Lahu nominalization, relativization and genitivization. In John Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, 237–257. New York: Seminar Press.10.1163/9789004372986_017Search in Google Scholar

Michailovsky, Boyd. 1988. La langue hayu. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Search in Google Scholar

Mithun, Marianne. 2007. Grammars and community. In Thomas Payne & David Weber (eds.), Perspectives on grammar writing (Benjamins current topics 11), 45–70. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.11.05mitSearch in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Eve. 2016. On linguistic categories. Linguistic Typology 20(2). 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0015.Search in Google Scholar

Mosel, Ulrike. 2006a. Sketch grammar. In JostGippert, NikolausHimmelmann & UlrikeMosel (eds.), Essentials of language documentation, 301–310. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Mosel, Ulrike. 2006b. Grammaticography: The art and craft of writing grammars. In Felix Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing, 41–68. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Moseley, Christopher (ed.). 2010. Atlas of the world’s languages in danger, 3rd edn. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Mushin, Ilana. 2013. Making knowledge visible in discourse: Implications for the study of linguistic evidentiality. Discourse Studies 15(5). 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613501447.Search in Google Scholar

Nida, Eugene. 1949. Morphology: The descriptive analysis of words. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Noonan, Michael. 1997. Versatile nominalizations. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 373–394. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.82.21nooSearch in Google Scholar

Noonan, M. 2007. Grammar writing for a grammar-reading audience. In Thomas Payne & David Weber (eds.), Perspectives on grammar writing (Benjamins current topics 11), 113–126. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.11.07nooSearch in Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew. 2014. Grammar writing from a dissertation advisor’s perspective. In Toshihide Nakayama & Keren Rice (eds.), The art and practice of grammar writing (Language documentation and conservation special publication 8), 7–24. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas. 2007. A grammar as a communicative act, or what does a grammatical description really describe? In Thomas Payne & David Weber (eds.), Perspectives on grammar writing (Benjamins current topics 11), 127–142. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.11.08paySearch in Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas E. 2014. Toward a balanced grammatical description. In Toshihide Nakayama & Keren Rice (eds.), The art and practice of grammar writing (Language documentation & conservation special publication no. 8), 91–108. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Search in Google Scholar

Poudel, Kedar Prasad. 2006. Dhankute Tamang grammar. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Rai, Novel Kishore & Werner Winter. 1997. Triplicated verbal adjuncts in Bantawa. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, 119–134. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Rai, Novel Kishore, Balthasar Bickel, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra P. Paudyal, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai & Sabine Stoll. 2005. Triplication and ideophones in Chintang. In Yogendra P. Yadava (ed.), Current issues in Nepalese linguistics, 205–209. Kirtipur: Linguistic Society of Nepal.Search in Google Scholar

Regmi, Dan Raj. 2012. A grammar of Bhujel. Munich: Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Rice, Keren. 2007. A typology of good grammars. In Thomas Payne & David Weber (eds.), Perspectives on grammar writing (Benjamins current topics 11), 143–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.11.09ricSearch in Google Scholar

Rutgers, Roland. 1998. Yamphu: Grammar, text & lexicon. Leiden: Research School CNWS.Search in Google Scholar

Samarin, William J. 1967. Field linguistics: A guide to linguistic field work. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Schackow, Diana. 2015. A grammar of Yakkha (Studies in diversity linguistics 7). Berlin: Language Science Press.10.26530/OAPEN_603340Search in Google Scholar

Schleicher, August. 1861. Compendium der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: H. Böhlau.Search in Google Scholar

Smith-Stark, Thomas. 2009. La trilogía catequística: Artes, Vocabularios y Doctrinas en la Nueva España como instrumento de una política lingüística de normalización. In Rebeca Barriga Villanueva & Pedro Martín Butragueño (eds.), Historia sociolingüística de México: México prehispánico y colonial, vol. I, 451–482. México D.F.: El Colegio de México.Search in Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicolas. 1992. La déixis en tibétain: Quelques faits remarquables. In Mary-Annick Morel & Laurent Danon-Boileau (eds.), La Deixis, 197–208. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicolas. 1994. Personne et médiatifs en tibétain. Faits de Langues 3. 149–158. https://doi.org/10.3406/flang.1994.918.Search in Google Scholar

Turin, Mark. 2012. A grammar of the Thangmi language: With an ethnographic introduction to the speakers and their culture. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

van Driem, George. 1987. A grammar of Limbu. (Mouton grammar library 4). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110846812Search in Google Scholar

van Driem, George. 1993. A grammar of Dumi. (Mouton grammar library 10). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110880915Search in Google Scholar

van Driem, George. 2007. A holistic approach to the fine art of grammar writing: The Dallas Manifesto. In Novel Kishore Rai, Yogendra Prasad Yadava, Bhim N. Regmi & Balaram Prasain (eds.), Recent studies in Nepalese linguistics, 93–184. Kathmandu: Linguistic Society of Nepal.Search in Google Scholar

Voeltz, Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.). 2001. Ideophones. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.44Search in Google Scholar

Watters, David. 2002. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486883Search in Google Scholar

Woodbury, Anthony. 1986. Interactions of tense and evidentiality: A study of Sherpa and English. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 188–202. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar