Change language
English Deutsch
Change currency
€ EUR £ GBP $ USD
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton December 23, 2016

Is typology relevant?

From the journal Linguistic Typology
https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2016-0018
Published Online: 2016-12-23
Published in Print: 2016-12-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

From the journal
Linguistic Typology
Linguistic Typology
Volume 20 Issue 3

Journal and Issue

Articles in the same Issue

Frontmatter
Discussion
Is typology relevant?
Typology, documentation, description, and typology
What about typology is useful for language documentation?
Type-ology or typ-ology?
Inspiration and corrective: Typology can be more than a mere pastime for historical linguists
Typology and coevolutionary linguistics
The mutual relevance of typology and variation studies
Language contact: Trojan horse or new potential for cross-fertilization?
Positive signs: How sign language typology benefits deaf communities and linguistic theory
Typology and the study of writing systems
What can linguistic typology contribute to research on language evolution?
Typology for the masses
Typological bottlenecks: How large-scale regional language typologies help us interpret global prehistory
Contributions of linguistic typology to psycholinguistics
The importance of linguistic typology for the neurobiology of language
Do language-specific word meanings shape sensory and motor brain systems? The relevance of semantic typology to cognitive neuroscience
Language typology in speech and language technology
Linguistic typology in natural language processing
Book Reviews
Tasaku Tsunoda: A grammar of Warrongo
Roland Kießling: Verbal serialisation in Isu (West-Ring) – a Grassfields language of Cameroon
Jonathan David Bobaljik: Universals in comparative morphology: Suppletion, superlatives and the structure of words
Editorial Report
Editorial Report
Downloaded on 28.5.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingty-2016-0018/html
Scroll to top button