Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton December 23, 2016

Positive signs: How sign language typology benefits deaf communities and linguistic theory

Roland Pfau and Ulrike Zeshan
From the journal Linguistic Typology

References

Aboh, Enoch O. & Roland Pfau. 2010. What’s a wh-word got to do with it? In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol. 5: Mapping the left periphery, 91–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aboh, Enoch O., Roland Pfau & Ulrike Zeshan. 2005. When a wh-word is not a wh-word: The case of Indian Sign Language. In Tanmoy Bhattacharya (ed.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics2005, 11–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2005. Morphological universals and the sign language type. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004, 19–39. Dordrecht: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler. 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81. 301–344.Search in Google Scholar

Bertone, Carmela. 2009. The syntax of noun modification in Italian Sign Language (LIS). University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 19. 7–28.Search in Google Scholar

Cecchetto, Carlo. 2012. Sentence types. In Pfau et al. (eds.) 2012, 292–315.Search in Google Scholar

Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi. 2009. Another way to mark syntactic dependencies: The case for right-peripheral specifiers in sign languages. Language 85. 278–320.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315–332.Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Costello, Brendan. 2015. Language and modality: Effects of the use of space in the agreement system of lengua de signos española (Spanish Sign Language). Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam doctoral dissertation. http://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/415_fulltext.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Cysouw, Michael. 2005. What it means to be rare: The case of person marking. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 235–258. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

de Vos, Connie & Roland Pfau. 2015. Sign language typology: The contribution of rural sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 1. 265–288.Search in Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max-Planck-Institut für evolutionäre Anthropologie. http://wals.infoSearch in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–492.Search in Google Scholar

Finnish Association of the Deaf & World Federation of the Deaf. 2015. Working together: Manual for sign language work within development cooperation. Helsinki: Finnish Association of the Deaf. http://www.slwmanual.infoSearch in Google Scholar

Geraci, Carlo, Robert Bayley, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati. 2015. Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh-signs. Linguistics 53. 125–151.Search in Google Scholar

Gertz, Genie & Patrick Boudreault (eds.). 2016. The Sage deaf studies encyclopedia. 3 vols. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language: Report of a conference held at Dobbs Ferry, New York, April 13–15, 1961, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, David. 1978. Typology and universals of personal pronouns. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. 3: Word structure, 213–248. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jepsen, Julie B., Goedele De Clerck, Sam Lutalo-Kiingi & William B. McGregor (eds.). 2015. Sign languages of the world: A comparative handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard P. Meier. 2011. On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37. 95–141.Search in Google Scholar

Mantovan, Lara. 2015. Nominal modification in Italian Sign Language (LIS) . Venezia: Università Ca’Foscari doctoral dissertation. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/5642Search in Google Scholar

Mathur, Gaurav & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.). 2011. Deaf around the world: The impact of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McBurney, Susan. 2001. William Stokoe and the discipline of sign language linguistics. Historiographica Linguistica 28. 143–186.Search in Google Scholar

Meier, Richard P. 2012. Language and modality. In Pfau et al. (eds.) 2012, 574–601.Search in Google Scholar

Meir, Irit. 2002. A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20. 413–450.Search in Google Scholar

Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence. 2014. Order of the major constituents in sign languages: implications for all language. Frontiers in Psychology 5. Article 376.Search in Google Scholar

Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Ben Bahan, Debra Aarons & Dawn MacLaughlin. 1997. Rightward wh-movement in American Sign Language. In Dorothee Beerman, David Leblanc & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Rightward movement, 247–278. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Nunes, Jairo & Ronice M. de Quadros. 2008. Phonetically realized traces in American Sign Language and Brazilian Sign Language. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 8, 177–190. Hamburg: Signum.Search in Google Scholar

Oomen, Marloes & Roland Pfau. 2017. Signing not (or not): A typological perspective on standard negation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Linguistic Typology.Search in Google Scholar

Padden, Carol. 1988. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.Search in Google Scholar

Palfreyman, Nick. 2017. Variation in Indonesian Sign Language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Lancaster: Ishara.Search in Google Scholar

Panda, Sibaji (forthcoming). MULTISIGN: Burundi Sign Language – Indian Sign Language bilinguals (Ishara Signed Publications 4). Lancaster: Ishara.Search in Google Scholar

Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin. 1997. WH-movement and the position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73. 18–57.Search in Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2016. Complex sentences in sign languages: Modality – typology – discourse. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Annika Herrmann (eds.), A matter of complexity: Subordination in sign languages, 1–35. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.). 2012. Sign language: An international handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Quer, Josep, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati, Carlo Geraci, Meltem Kelepir, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.). 2017. SignGram Blueprint: A guide to sign language grammar writing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Open access resource.Search in Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign languages and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schuit, Joke. 2013. Signs of the Arctic: Typological aspects of Inuit Sign Language. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam doctoral dissertation. http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.404611Search in Google Scholar

Siewierska, Anna. 2013. Verbal person marking. In Dryer & Haspelmath (eds.) 2013, Chapter 102. http://wals.info/chapter/102 (accessed on 28 August 2016)Search in Google Scholar

Velupillai, Viveka. 2012. An introduction to linguistic typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004a. Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 8. 1–58.Search in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004b. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Language 80. 7–39.Search in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike, Cesar Ernesto Escobedo Delgado, Hasan Dikyuva, Sibaji Panda & Connie de Vos. 2013. Cardinal numerals in rural sign languages: Approaching cross-modal typology. Linguistic Typology 17. 357–396.Search in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike (ed.). 2006. Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara.Search in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike & Pamela Perniss (eds.). 2008. Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara.Search in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike & Keiko Sagara (eds.). 2016. Semantic fields in sign languages. Colour, kinship and quantification. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton; Nijmegen: Ishara.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-8-31
Revised: 2016-9-9
Published Online: 2016-12-23
Published in Print: 2016-12-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton