Abstract
This article first outlines different ways of how psycholinguists have dealt with linguistic diversity and illustrates these approaches with three familiar cases from research on language processing, language acquisition, and language disorders. The second part focuses on the role of morphology and morphological variability across languages for psycholinguistic research. The specific phenomena to be examined are to do with stem-formation morphology and inflectional classes; they illustrate how experimental research that is informed by linguistic typology can lead to new insights.
Acknowledgements
Supported by an Alexander-von-Humboldt-Professorship. I wish to thank the members of the Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism (PRIM), particularly João Veríssimo, Yael Farhy, and Claudia Felser for helpful comments on the present article.
Abbreviations
- 1/3
1st/3rd person
- inf
infinitive
- m
masculine
- pst
past
- ptcp
participle
- sg
singular
References
Albright, Adam. 2002. Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian. Language 78. 684–709.10.1353/lan.2003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Albright, Adam & Bruce Hayes. 2003. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition 90. 119–161.10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00146-XSearch in Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511586262Search in Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Berent, Iris, Vered Vaknin & Gary F. Marcus. 2007. Roots, stems, and the universality of lexical representations: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognition 104. 254–286.10.1016/j.cognition.2006.06.002Search in Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 2014. Cross-linguistic comparisons in child language research. Journal of Child Language 41(S1). 26–37.10.1017/S0305000914000208Search in Google Scholar
Bick, Atira S., Gadi Goelman & Ram Frost. 2011. Hebrew brain vs. English brain: Language modulates the way it is processed. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23. 2280–2290.10.1162/jocn.2010.21583Search in Google Scholar
Boudelaa, Sami & William D. Marslen-Wilson. 2015. Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Arabic. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30. 955–992.10.1080/23273798.2015.1048258Search in Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Carol Lynn Moder. 1983. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 59. 251–270.10.2307/413574Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald. 1986. Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics 24. 79–122.10.1515/ling.1986.24.1.79Search in Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald, Fraibet Aveledo & Iggy Roca. 2002. The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language 29. 591–622.10.1017/S0305000902005172Search in Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Martina Penke. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-Corpus. In Jürgen M. Meisel (ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition, 181–223. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-2803-2_7Search in Google Scholar
De Diego Balaguer, Ruth, Nuria Sebastián-Gallés, Begoña Díaz & Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells. 2005. Morphological processing in early bilinguals: An ERP study of regular and irregular verb processing. Cognitive Brain Research 25. 312–327.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.06.003Search in Google Scholar
Farhy, Yael, João Veríssimo & Harald Clahsen. 2016. Universal and particular in morphological processing: Evidence from Hebrew. Unpublished manuscript, Universität Potsdam.Search in Google Scholar
Field, John. 2004. Psycholinguistics: The key concepts. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9780203506929Search in Google Scholar
Frost, Ram, Avital Deutsch, Orna Gilboa, Michal Tannenbaum & William D. Marslen-Wilson. 2000. Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors. Memory & Cognition 28. 1277–1288.10.3758/BF03211828Search in Google Scholar
Gor, Kira & Svetlana Cook. 2010. Nonnative processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning 60. 88–126.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00552.xSearch in Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef. 1990. Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6742.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Joanisse, Marc F. & Mark S. Seidenberg. 1999. Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96. 7592–7597.10.1073/pnas.96.13.7592Search in Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary F., Ursula Brinkmann, Harald Clahsen, Richard Wiese & Steven Pinker. 1995. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29. 189–256.10.1006/cogp.1995.1015Search in Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary F., Steven Pinker, Michael Ullman, Michelle Hollander, T. John Rosen, Fei Xu & Harald Clahsen. 1992. Overregularization in language acquisition (Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 228). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.2307/1166115Search in Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, William D., Lorraine K. Tyler, Rachelle Waksler & Lianne Older. 1994. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 101. 3–33.10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3Search in Google Scholar
McClelland, James L. & Karalyn Patterson. 2002. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6. 465–472.10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01993-9Search in Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 2016. Morphology in linguistic typology. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139814720.025Search in Google Scholar
Orsolini, Margherira, Rachele Fanari & Hugo Bowles. 1998. Acquiring regular and irregular inflection in a language with verb classes. Language and Cognitive Processes 13. 425–464.10.1080/016909698386456Search in Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York, NY: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven & Michael T. Ullman. 2002. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6. 456–463.10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3Search in Google Scholar
Prasada, Sandeep & Steven Pinker. 1993. Generalization of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes 8. 1–56.10.1080/01690969308406948Search in Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland. 1986. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In David E. Rumelhart, James L. McClelland & The PDP Research Group (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2, 216–271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Say, Tessa & Harald Clahsen. 2002. Words, rules and stems in the Italian mental lexicon. In Sieb Nooteboom, Fred Weerman & Frank Wijnen (eds.), Storage and computation in the language faculty, 93–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0355-1_4Search in Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. & Thomas G. Bever. 1982. Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition 12. 229–265.10.1016/0010-0277(82)90033-6Search in Google Scholar
Stanners, Robert F., James J. Neiser, William P. Hernon & Roger Hall. 1979. Memory representation for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18. 399–412.10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90219-6Search in Google Scholar
Stavrakaki, Stavroula & Harald Clahsen. 2009. The perfective past tense in Greek child language. Journal of Child Language 36. 113–142.10.1017/S0305000908008866Search in Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486333Search in Google Scholar
Townsend, David J. & Thomas G. Bever. 2001. Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6184.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ullman, Michael T., Roumyana Pancheva, Tracy Love, Eiling Yee, David Swinney & Gregory Hickok. 2005. Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgment of inflection in aphasia. Brain and Language 93. 185–238.10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.001Search in Google Scholar
Veríssimo, João & Harald Clahsen. 2009. Morphological priming by itself: A study of Portuguese conjugations. Cognition 112. 187–194.10.1016/j.cognition.2009.04.003Search in Google Scholar
Veríssimo, João & Harald Clahsen. 2014. Variables and similarity in linguistic generalization: Evidence from inflectional classes in Portuguese. Journal of Memory and Language 76. 61–79.10.1016/j.jml.2014.06.001Search in Google Scholar
Villalva, Alina. 2000. Estruturas morfológicas: Unidades e hierarquias nas palavras do português. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian & Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton