Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton May 26, 2021

Towards a typology of predicative demonstratives

  • Don Killian EMAIL logo
From the journal Linguistic Typology

Abstract

Although there has been growing interest in the study of demonstratives, a number of demonstrative categories remain largely unexplored. This article addresses one gap, presenting a preliminary typological overview of predicative demonstratives, a type of demonstrative used primarily in non-verbal predication constructions. The morphosyntax of predicative demonstratives is first briefly examined, followed by a typological characterization based primarily on semantic and morphosyntactic grounds. Predicative demonstratives focus on the immediately surrounding spatial, temporal, or textual environment of the speech act, showing restrictions on occurring in negated clauses or questions. In terms of lexical categorization, predicative demonstratives most commonly find themselves in a small closed word class of non-verbal predicators. Four types of predicative demonstratives are proposed here: Presentatives, identifiers, localizers, and the rare copular demonstratives.


Corresponding author: Don Killian [dɑːn ˈkʰɪliɨ̞n], Department of Languages, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Ksenia Shagal and Maria Koptjevskaja Tamm for help with glossing the Russian examples, Holger Dießel for help with understanding demonstratives, and all the researchers who helped me with their languages of expertise over the years. I am also grateful to Harald Hammarström for all his help with supplying linguistic material, without which this work would not have been possible. Funding for the research was provided in different periods by the Kone foundation and the Finnish cultural foundation, and their support is greatly appreciated. Finally, I am grateful for the the helpful comments on earlier drafts provided by Johanna Nichols, Angela Terrill, Diana Forker, Antti Laine, Stefan Savić, Bastian Persohn, and three anonymous reviewers. Any errors are my own.

References

Bauer, Winifred. 1993. Maoridse. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Benton, Richard A. 1971. Pangasinan reference grammar. (Pali Language Texts: Micronesia). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bergen, Benjamin & Madelaine Plauché. 2007. The convergent evolution of radial constructions: French and English deictics and existentials. Cognitive Linguistics 16(1). 1–42.10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Bergsland, Knut. 1997. Aleut Grammar: Unangam Tunuganann Achixaasix̂. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska.Search in Google Scholar

Berry, Keith. 1995. A description of the Abun language: Phonology and basic morpho-syntax. Melbourne: LaTrobe University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Bhat, D.N.S. 2004. Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, Frank R. 1925. A grammar of the Tagálog language. (American Oriental Series), vol. 1. New Haven: American Oriental Society.Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, Robert. 1994. A grammar of Supyire. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110883053Search in Google Scholar

Cleary-Kemp, Jessica. 2007. Universal uses of demonstratives: Evidence from four Malayo-Polynesian languages. Oceanic Linguistics 46(2). 267–308. https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2008.0008.10.1353/ol.2008.0008Search in Google Scholar

Cobbinah, Alexander Yao. 2013. Nominal classification and verbal nouns in Baïnounk Gubëeher. London: University of London dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard & Norval Smith. 1977. Lingua descriptive studies: Questionnaire. Lingua 42. 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(77)90063-8.Search in Google Scholar

Daniels, Don. 2015. A reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, lexicon, and morphosyntax. Santa Barbara: University of California at Santa Barbara dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Dayley, Jon P. 1989. Tümpisa (Panamint) Shoshone grammar. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Vos, Fiona. 2011. Essential Tagalog grammar: A reference for learners of Tagalog. Fiona de Vos.Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 1997. Predicative demonstratives. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23(1). 72–82. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1282.10.3765/bls.v23i1.1282Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 1999a. Demonstratives: form, function and grammaticalization. (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.42Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 1999b. The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistic Typology 3. 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.1.10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2012. Deixis and demonstratives. In Paul Portner Claudia Maienborn & Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3, 2407–2431. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Dimock, Laura Gail. 2009. A grammar of Nahavaq (Malakula, Vanuatu). Wellington, NZ: Victoria University of Wellington dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, R.M.W. 2003. Demonstratives: A cross linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27(1). 61–112. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.1.04dix.10.1075/sl.27.1.04dixSearch in Google Scholar

Dixon, R.M.W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory volume 2: Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dol, Philomena. 2007. A grammar of Maybrat: A language of the Bird’s Head pennisula, Papua province, Indonesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Dombrowsky-Hahn, Klaudia. 2015. A grammar of Syer (Western Karaboro, Senufo). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Donohue, Mark. 1999. A grammar of Tukang Besi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110805543Search in Google Scholar

Forman, Michael L. 1972. Zamboangueño texts with grammatical analysis: A study of Philippine Creole Spanish. Ithaca: Cornell University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Franchetto, Bruna. 2010. The ergativity effect in Kuikuro. In Spike Gildea & Francesc Queixalós (eds.), Ergativity in Amazonia, 121–158. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.89.06fraSearch in Google Scholar

Gildea, Spike. 1993. The development of tense markers from demonstrative pronouns in Panare (Cariban). Studies in Language 17(1). 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.1.03gil.Search in Google Scholar

Graczyk, Randolph. 2007. A grammar of Crow: Apsáaloke Aliláau. (Studies in the Native Languages of the Americas). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore & Matthew Riley. 1996. The role of deictics in discourse coherence: French voici/voilà and Russian vot/von. Journal of Pragmatics 25. 819–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00011-9.Search in Google Scholar

Guérin, Valérie. 2015. Demonstrative verbs: A typology of verbal manner deixis. Linguistic Typology 19(2). 141–199. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2015-0006.Search in Google Scholar

Halme, Riikka. 2004. A tonal grammar of Kwanyama. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Hanks, William F. 2009. Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110884210Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 1981. Basic materials in Mara: Grammar, texts and dictionary. (Pacific Linguistics: Series C), vol. 60. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 2008. A grammar of Jamsay. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110207224Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 2015a. A grammar of Ben Tey (Dogon of Beni). Language Description Heritage. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0028-1AEF-7.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 2015b. A grammar of Togo Kan. Language Description Heritage. http:hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0028-1AEF-7.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 2016. A grammar of Nanga. Language Description Heritage. http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-1748-4.Search in Google Scholar

Heath, Jeffrey. 2017. A grammar of Yanda Dom (Dogon, Mali). Language Description Heritage. http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-4725-6.Search in Google Scholar

Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110883282Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1996. Demonstratives in narrative discourse: A taxonomy of universal uses. In Barbara Fox (ed.), Studies in anaphora, vol. 33, 205–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.33.08himSearch in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2005. Tagalog. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar. London, New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Bob Morris. 2012. Non-canonical syntax: A presentative clause in Welsh. Available at: http://users.aber.ac.uk/bmj/Ymchwil/dyma3.pdf (accessed 02 December 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Joseph, Brian D. 1981. On the synchrony and diachrony of modern Greek NA. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1179/030701381806931514.Search in Google Scholar

Killian, Don. 2015. Aspects of Uduk morphology and phonology. Helsinki: University of Helsinki dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Lacrampe, Sébastien. 2014. Lelepa: Topics in the grammar of a Vanuatu language. Canberra: Australian National University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2018. Introduction: Demonstratives: Patterns in diversity. In Stephen C. Levinson, Sarah Cutfield, Michael J. Dunn, N. J. Enfield & Sérgio Meira (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108333818.002Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. & Niclas Burenhult. 2009. Semplates: A new concept in lexical semantics? Language 85(1). 153–174.10.1353/lan.0.0090Search in Google Scholar

Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2008. A grammar of Toqabaqita, vol. 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110199062Search in Google Scholar

Lüpke, Friederike. 2005. A grammar of Jalonke argument structure. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Malicisi, Jonathan. 1974. A structural sketch of Halitaq Baytan (a Sambal Aeta dialect). Manila: University of the Philippines MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Manfredi, Stefano. 2014. Demonstratives in a Bedouin Arabic dialect of Western Sudan. Folia Orientalia 51. 27–50.Search in Google Scholar

Marmion, Douglas E. 2010. Topics in the phonology and morphology of Wutung. Canberra: Australian National University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Maslova, Elena. 2003. Tundra Yukaghir. München: Lincom.Search in Google Scholar

Meman, Paz B. 1993. Cebuano language packet. Manila: Peace Corps.Search in Google Scholar

Moignet, Gérard. 1981. Systématique de la langue française. Paris: Klincksieck.Search in Google Scholar

Payne, Thomas E. & Doris L. Payne. 2013. A typological grammar of Panare: A Cariban language of Venezuela. (Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas). Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004242197Search in Google Scholar

Pérez, Marilola. 2015. Cavite Chabacano Philippine Creole Spanish: Description and typology. Berkeley: University of California at Berkeley dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Petit, Daniel. 2010. On presentative particles in the Baltic languages. In Nicole Nau & Norbert Ostrowski (eds.), Particles and connectives in Baltic, 151–170. Vilnius: Vilniaus Universitetas.Search in Google Scholar

Sagna, Serge. 2008. Formal and semantic properties of the Gújjolaay Eegimaa (a.k.a Banjal) nominal classification system. London: University of London, SOAS dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul & Fe Otanes. 1972. Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520321205Search in Google Scholar

Schachter, Paul & Timothy Shopen. 2007. Parts-of-speech systems. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Clause structure, 2nd edn, vol. 1, 1–60. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511619427.001Search in Google Scholar

Schuh, Russell. 1983. Kilba equational sentences. Studies in African Linguistics 14(3). 311–326.10.32473/sal.v14i3.107527Search in Google Scholar

Souag, Lameen. 2014. Berber and Arabic in Siwa (Egypt): A study in linguistic contact. (Berber Studies), vol. 37. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Search in Google Scholar

Soukka, Maria. 2000. A descriptive grammar of Noon: A Cangin language of Senegal. (LINCOM Studies in African Linguistics), vol. 40. München: Lincom.Search in Google Scholar

Spalding, Alex. 1998. Inuktitut - a multi-dialectal outline dictionary. http://www.inuktitutcomputing.ca/Spalding/index.php (accessed 15 December 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Stassen, Leon. 2009. Predicative possession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sumbatova, Nina & Rasul Mutalov. 2003. A grammar of Icari Dargwa. München: Lincom.Search in Google Scholar

Terrill, Angela. 2003. A grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110923964Search in Google Scholar

Treis, Yvonne. 2019. Presentative demonstratives in Kambaata from a Cushitic perspective. In Isabelle Leblic & Lameen Souag (eds.), Du terrain à la théorie. Les 40 ans du Lacito, vol. 1. Villejuif, Lacito: Publications du Lacito, actes de colloque.Search in Google Scholar

Viljoen, Melanie Helen. 2013. A grammatical description of the Buwal language. Melbourne: LaTrobe University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wane, Mohamadou Hamine. 2017. La grammaire du noon. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Huayun & Daogen Cao. 2014. Demonstrative interjections in Huangxiao cluster of Jianghuai Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 42(2). 267–308.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2021-2078).


Received: 2019-01-17
Accepted: 2021-02-06
Published Online: 2021-05-26
Published in Print: 2022-05-25

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.5.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingty-2021-2078/html
Scroll to top button