Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 29, 2017

The “Negative-Assessment-Construction” – A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture?

  • Jana Bressem EMAIL logo and Cornelia Müller
From the journal Linguistics Vanguard

Abstract

This paper offers an analysis of a multimodal pattern of negative assessment, which takes as the starting point a particular recurrent gesture: the Throwing Away gesture. Recurrent gestures are characterized by a stabilized form-meaning pairing. In the case of the Throwing Away gesture, form and meaning are grounded in an “Away-Action-Scheme”: i. e., a socially shared, sedimented experience of removing unwanted objects at, on, or approaching a speaker’s body. Based on a cognitive-linguistic analysis of the gesture and its use in five different verbal contexts, we suggest that the Throwing Away gesture enters a verbo-kinesic construction that consists of the “Throwing Away Gesture + particles/negation/N/V/ADV”. The meaning of the verbo-kinesic construction is grounded in an embodied frame of experience in Fillmore’s sense: i. e., a schematized scene involving mundane actions, here ‘removals of unwanted objects’ (e. g., ‘Away-Action-Scenes’). Referring to Goldberg’s “Scene Encoding Hypothesis”, we propose that the “Negative-Assessment-Construction” designates scenes essential to human experience. With this focus, the paper puts forward a gesture-first account on verbo-kinesic constructions and suggests a possible candidate for such a multimodal pattern.

References

Andrén, Mats. 2010. Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Lund University PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Andrén, Mats. 2014. Multimodal constructions in children: Is the headshake part of language? Gesture 14(2). 141–170.10.1075/gest.14.2.02andSearch in Google Scholar

Bressem, Jana. submitted. Gesture-grammar-constructions.Search in Google Scholar

Bressem, Jana, Silva H. Ladewig & Cornelia Müller. 2013. Linguistic annotation system for gestures (LASG). In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. (Handbooks of linguistics and communication science 38.1.), 1098–1125. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261318.1098Search in Google Scholar

Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller. 2014a. The family of away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Handbooks of linguistics and communication science 38.2.), 1592–1604. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110302028.1592Search in Google Scholar

Bressem, Jana & Cornelia Müller. 2014b. A repertoire of recurrent gestures of German. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Handbooks of linguistics and communication science 38.2.), 1575–1591. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110302028.1575Search in Google Scholar

Calbris, Genevieve. 2011. Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/gs.5Search in Google Scholar

Calbris, Geneviève. 1990. The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Calbris, Geneviève. 2003. From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis. Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture 3(1). 19–46.10.1075/gest.3.1.03calSearch in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (eds.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–37. Seoul: Hanshin.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.10.2307/414531Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. (Cognitive theory of language and culture). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, Simon. 2009. Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. Université Michel de Montaigne, Bourdeaux 3 PhD Thesis dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, Simon. 2010. Evidence for node and scope of negation in coverbal gesture. Gesture 10(1). 29–51.10.1075/gest.10.1.03harSearch in Google Scholar

Harrison, Simon. 2014. The organisation of kinesic ensembles associated with negation. Gesture 14(2). 117–140.10.1075/gest.14.2.01harSearch in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1988. How gestures can become like words. In Poyatos Fernando (ed.), Crosscultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131–141. Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe, Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Search in Google Scholar

Ladewig, Silva H. 2011. Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. Cogni Textes 6.10.4000/cognitextes.406Search in Google Scholar

Ladewig, Silva H. 2014. Recurrent gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (handbooks of linguistics and communication science 38.2.), 1558–1574. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Cognitive (Construction) grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1). 167–176.10.1515/COGL.2009.010Search in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mittelberg, Irene. this volume. Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns.Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. 2010. Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive. Sprache und Literatur 41(1). 37–68.10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000004Search in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. 2014. Gestures as “deliberate expressive movement”. In Mandana Seyfeddinipur & Marianne Gullberg (eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance, 127–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.188.07mulSearch in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia. to appear. How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture.10.1075/gest.16.2.05mulSearch in Google Scholar

Müller, Cornelia, Jana Bressem & Silva H. Ladewig 2013. Towards a grammar of gesture: A form-based view. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. (Handbooks of linguistics and communication science 38.1.), 707–733. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110261318.707Search in Google Scholar

Schoonjans, Steven. 2014. Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. KU Leuven PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Schoonjans, Steven, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts. 2015. Multimodalität in der Konstruktionsgrammatik: Eine kritische Betrachtung illustriert anhand einer Gestikanalyse der Partikel ’einfach’. In Jörg Bücker, Susanne Günthner & Wolfgang Imo (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V – Konstruktionen im Spannungsfeld von sequenziellen Mustern, kommunikativen Gattungen und Textsorten, 291–308. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Streeck, Jürgen. 2005. Pragmatic aspects of gesture. In Jacob Mey (ed.), International encyclopedia of languages and linguistics, 275–299. Oxford: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Streeck, Jürgen. 2009. Gesturecraft. The manufacture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.2Search in Google Scholar

Teßendorf, Sedinha. 2014. Pragmatic and metaphoric gestures – combining functional with cognitive approaches in the analysis of the “brushing aside gesture”. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva H. Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Handbook of linguistics and communication science 38.2.), Unpublished manuscript vols, 1540–1558. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110302028.1540Search in Google Scholar

Teßendorf, Sedinha. 2016. Actions as sources for gestures. In Konstanze Jungbluth & Marta Fernández-Villanueva (eds.), Beyond language boundaries multimodal use in multilingual contexts, 34–54. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter/Mouton.10.1515/9783110458817-003Search in Google Scholar

Zima, Elisabeth. 2014. Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V (motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y]. Gesprächsforschung-Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 15. 1–48.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-08-30
Accepted: 2016-10-18
Published Online: 2017-06-29

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053/html
Scroll to top button