Abstract
Although experimental methods are used in the study of language change, it has been claimed that there is no analogue of the biologist’s Drosophila – no means, in other words, of observing change in the laboratory. Here it is argued that this pessimism is unwarranted, and that there is in fact something equivalent: a set of experimental methods developed originally to study the emergence and evolution of language, and which involve the use of novel “laboratory languages” to play games with a social component. These methods are described, and arguments are made in favor of their broader application to questions of change in modern language. Ideally (as has begun to occur in a few cases) this should involve interdisciplinary collaborations, and it would both open new doors for the testing of hypotheses and bring researchers in the field of language evolution into contact with a vast store of real-world data. Concerns about the authenticity of laboratory data are not unreasonable, but less pressing than might be imagined, and in fact should call for precisely the kind of interdisciplinary approach advocated here. This can only benefit everyone involved.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Bruno Galantucci for helpful comments on a very early version of this paper, as well as Bill Labov, Ira Noveck, Betsy Sneller, and Meredith Tamminga for enlightening discussions on relevant issues, without which this paper would not be what it is.
References
Aronoff, Mark. 2016. Competition and the lexicon. In A. Elia, C. Iacobino & M. Voghera (eds.), Livelli di analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia. atti del xlvii congresso internazionale della società di linguistica Italiana. Rome: Bulzoni Editore.Search in Google Scholar
Bartlett, Frederic C. 1932. Remembering. Oxford: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Bavelas, Alex. 1952. Communication patterns in problem-solving groups. Cybernetics. Circular causal and feedback mechanisms in biological and social systems. Transactions of the ninth conference, edited by von Foerster Heinz.Search in Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1990. Language and species. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226220949.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2003. Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3). 398–416.10.1111/1467-9481.00232Search in Google Scholar
Caldwell, Christine A. & Ailsa E. Millen. 2008. Experimental models for testing hypotheses about cumulative cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behavior 29(3). 165–171.10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2010. New directions in sociolinguistic cognition. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15(2). 30–39.Search in Google Scholar
Chiang, Yuet-Sim D. & Mary Schmida. 2002. Language identity and language ownership: Linguistic conflicts of first-year university writing students. In Vivan Zamel & Ruth Spack (eds.), Enriching ESOL pedagogy, 393–409. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620539Search in Google Scholar
Cornish, Hannah, Mónica Tamariz & Simon Kirby. 2009. Complex adaptive systems and the origins of adaptive structure: What experiments can tell us. Language Learning 59(1). 187–205.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00540.xSearch in Google Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer, Paul Smolensky & Géraldine Legendre. 2012. Learning biases predict a word order universal. Cognition 122. 306–329.10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.017Search in Google Scholar
de Ruiter, Jan Peter, Matthijs L. Noordzij, Sarah Newman-Norlund, Peter Hagoort & Ivan Toni. 2007. On the origin of intentions. In Y. Rossetti, P. Haggard & M. Kawato (eds.), Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition, 592–610. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J., Christian Langstrof & Paul Foulkes. 2013. Listener evaluation of sociophonetic variability: Probing constraints and capabilities. Linguistics 51(2). 355–380.10.1515/ling-2013-0014Search in Google Scholar
Drager, Katie. 2013. Experimental methods in sociolinguistics. In Janet Holmes & Kirk Hazen (eds.), Research methods in sociolinguistics: A practical guide, 58–73. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Dunbar, Robin I. M. 1996. Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber and Faber.Search in Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476.10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.xSearch in Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2008. The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 92(2). 223–249.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00716.xSearch in Google Scholar
Fay, Nicolas, Michael Arbib & Simon Garrod. 2013. How to bootstrap a human communication system. Cognitive Science 37(7). 1356–1367.10.1111/cogs.12048Search in Google Scholar
Fay, Nicolas, Simon Garrod & Leo Roberts. 2008. The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363(1509). 3553–3561.10.1098/rstb.2008.0130Search in Google Scholar
Fedzechkina, Mariya, T. Florian Jaeger & Elissa Newport. 2012. Language learners restructure their input to facilitate efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(44). 17897–17902.10.1073/pnas.1215776109Search in Google Scholar
Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2010. The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511817779Search in Google Scholar
Folia, Vasiliki, Julia Uddén, Meinou De Vries, Christian Forkstam & Karl Magnus Petersson. 2010. Artificial language learning in adults and children. Language Learning 60. 188–220.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00606.xSearch in Google Scholar
Frishberg, Nancy. 1975. Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51(3). 696–719.10.2307/412894Search in Google Scholar
Galantucci, Bruno. 2005. An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science 29(5). 737–767.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_34Search in Google Scholar
Galantucci, Bruno, Simon Garrod & Gareth Roberts. 2012. Experimental semiotics. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(8). 477–493.10.1002/lnc3.351Search in Google Scholar
Galantucci, Bruno & Gareth Roberts. 2012. Experimental semiotics: An engine of discovery for understanding human communication. Advances in Complex Systems 15(3–4). 1150026.10.1142/S0219525911500263Search in Google Scholar
Garrod, Simon & Matin J. Pickering. 2007. Alignment in dialogue. In Gareth M. Gaskell & Gerry Altmann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 443–452. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0026Search in Google Scholar
Gong, Tao, Lan Shuai & Menghan Zhang. 2014. Modelling language evolution: Examples and predictions. Physics of Life Reviews 11(2). 280–302.10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.009Search in Google Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Lyle Campbell, Jennifer Hay, Margaret Maclagan, Andrea Sudbury & Peter Trudgill. 2004. New Zealand English: Its origins and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486678Search in Google Scholar
Hahn, Matthew W. & R. Alexander Bentley. 2003. Drift as a mechanism for cultural change: An example from baby names. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270. (S120–S123).10.1098/rsbl.2003.0045Search in Google Scholar
Halpin, Zuleyma Tang. 1991. Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. In Peter G. Hepper (eds.), Kin recognition, chap. 8, 220–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511525414.010Search in Google Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Charles Yang, Robert C. Berwick, Ian Tattersall, Michael J. Ryan, Jeffrey Watamull, Noam Chomsky & Richard C. Lewontin. 2014. The mystery of language evolution. Frontiers in Psychology 5. 401.10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401Search in Google Scholar
Healey, Patrick G., T. Nik Swoboda, Ichiro Umata & Yasuhiro Katagiri. 2002. Graphical representation in graphical dialogue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57(4). 375–395.10.1006/ijhc.2002.1022Search in Google Scholar
Healey, Patrick G., T. Nik Swoboda, Ichiro Umata & James King. 2007. Graphical language games: Interactional constraints on representational form. Cognitive Science 31(2). 285–309.10.1080/15326900701221363Search in Google Scholar
Healey, Patrick G. T. 2008. Interactive misalignment: The role of repair in the development of group sub-languages. In Robin Cooper & Ruth Kempson (eds.), Language in flux: Relating dialogue coordination to language variation, change and evolution. London: College Publications.Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. On the evolution of grammatical forms. In Alison Wray (eds.), The transition to language, 376–397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Höfler, Stefan & Andrew D. M. Smith. 2017. From metaphor to symbols and grammar: The cumulative cultural evolution of language. In Camilla Power, Morna Finnegan & Hilary Callan (eds.), Human origins: Contributions from social anthropology, 153–179. Oxford: Berghahn Books.10.2307/j.ctvswx6tg.10Search in Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. 1990. Nativist and functional explanations in language acquisition. In I. M. Roca (eds.), Logical issues in language acquisition, 85–136. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.10.1515/9783110870374-007Search in Google Scholar
Janik, Vincent M., Laela S. Sayigh & Randall S. Wells. 2006. Signature whistle shape conveys identity information to bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(21). 8293–8297.10.1073/pnas.0509918103Search in Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2011. Historical linguistics and sociolinguistics: Strange bedfellows or natural friends?. In N. Langer, S. Davies & W. Vandenbussche (eds.), Language and history, linguistics and historiography, 67–88. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar
Kam, Carla L. Hudson & Elissa Newport. 2009. Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology 59(1). 30–66.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.01.001Search in Google Scholar
Keen, Sara C., Daniel Meliza, Julia Pilowsky & Dustin R. Rubenstein. 2016. Song in a social and sexual context: Vocalizations signal identity and rank in both sexes of a cooperative breeder. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 4(46). 1–9.10.3389/fevo.2016.00046Search in Google Scholar
Kerr, Deborah & Kenny Smith. 2016. The spontaneous emergence of linguistic diversity in an artificial language. In Seán G. Roberts, Christine Cuskley, Luke McCrohon, Lluis Barceló-Coblijn, Olga Fehér & Tessa Verhoef (eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference (EVOLANG11). http://evolang.org/neworleans/papers/112.html.Search in Google Scholar
Kirby, Simon. 1999. Function, selection and innateness: The emergence of language universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kirby, Simon, Hannah Cornish & Kenny Smith. 2008. Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(31). 10681–10686.10.1073/pnas.0707835105Search in Google Scholar
Kirby, Simon, Kenny Smith & Henry Brighton. 2004. From UG to universals: Linguistic adaptation through iterated learning. Studies in Language 28(5). 587–607.10.1075/bct.7.08kirSearch in Google Scholar
Kirby, Simon, Mónica Tamariz, Hannah Cornish & Kenny Smith. 2015. Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure. Cognition 141. 87–102.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016Search in Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M. & S.Weinheimer. 1964. Changes in reference phrases as a function of frequency of usage in social interaction – A preliminary study. Psychonomic Science 1(5). 113–114.10.3758/BF03342817Search in Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1. 199–244.10.1017/S0954394500000168Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1). 97–120.10.1017/S0047404500006576Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of linguistic change. Volume 2: Social factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2011. Principles of linguistic change. Volume 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781444327496Search in Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E., Richard C. Hodgson, Robert C. Gardner & Samuel Fillenbaum. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1). 44–51.10.1037/h0044430Search in Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language change. Journal of Linguistics 26(1). 79–102.10.1017/S0022226700014432Search in Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfrid P. 1981. Historical linguistics and sociolinguistics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 31. 11–28.10.1515/ijsl.1981.31.11Search in Google Scholar
Loudermilk, Brandon C. 2013. Psycholinguistic approaches. In R. Bayley, R. Cameron & C. Lucas (eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics, 132–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199744084.013.0007Search in Google Scholar
McMahon, April. 2007. Sounds, brain and evolution: Or, why phonology is plural. In Martha C. Pennington (eds.), Phonology in context, 38–57. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230625396_7Search in Google Scholar
Mesoudi, Alex. 2007. Using the methods of experimental social psychology to study cultural evolution. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 1(1). 35–58.10.1037/h0099359Search in Google Scholar
Micklos, Ashley. 2016. Interaction for facilitating conventionalization: Negotiating the silent gesture communication of noun–verb pairs. In Seán G. Roberts, Christine Cuskley, Luke McCrohon, Lluis Barceló-Coblijn, Olga Fehér & Tessa Verhoef (eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference (EVOLANG11). http://evolang.org/neworleans/papers/143.html.Search in Google Scholar
Noveck, Ira & Dan Sperber. 2004. Experimental pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230524125Search in Google Scholar
Ohala, John. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In C. Jones (eds.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Pinker, Stephen & Paul Bloom. 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13. 707–784.10.1017/S0140525X00081061Search in Google Scholar
Plichta, Bartlomiej & Brad Rakerd. 2010. Perceptions of /a/fronting across two Michigan dialects. In Dennis R. Preston & N. A. Niedzielski (eds.), A reader in sociophonetics, 223–240. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Raviv, Limor & Inbal Arnon. 2016. Language evolution in the lab: The case of child learners. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman & John C. Trueswell (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1643–1648. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Gareth. 2008. Language and the freerider problem: An experimental paradigm. Biological Theory 3(2). 174–183.10.1162/biot.2008.3.2.174Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Gareth. 2010. An experimental study of the role of social selection and frequency of interaction in linguistic diversity. Interaction Studies 11(10). 138–159.10.1075/is.11.1.06robSearch in Google Scholar
Roberts, Gareth. 2013. Perspectives on language as a source of social markers. Language and Linguistics Compass 7(12). 619–632.10.1111/lnc3.12052Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Gareth & Maryia Fedzechkina. 2016. Social biases versus efficient communication: An iterated learning study. In Seán G. Roberts, Christine Cuskley, Luke McCrohon, Lluis Barceló-Coblijn, Olga Fehér & Tessa Verhoef (eds.), The evolution of language: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference (EVOLANG11). http://evolang.org/neworleans/papers/127.html.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Gareth & Maryia Fedzechkina. submitted. Social and cognitive biases interact during language evolution: An iterated-learning study.Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Gareth & Bruno Galantucci. 2012. The emergence of duality of patterning: Insights from the laboratory. Language and Cognition 4(4). 297–318. DOI:10.1515/langcog-2012-0017.10.1515/langcog-2012-0017Search in Google Scholar
Roberts, Gareth, Jirka Lewandowski & Bruno Galantucci. 2015. How communication changes when we cannot mime the world: Experimental evidence for the effect of iconicity on combinatoriality. Cognition 141. 52–66.10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Irit Meir & Carol Padden. 2011. The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 502–543.10.1007/s11049-011-9128-2Search in Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, Thomas C. & Simon Kirby. 2010. Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Science 14(9). 411–417.10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.006Search in Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, Thomas C., Simon Kirby & Graham R. S Ritchie. 2009. Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition 113(2). 226–233.10.1142/9789812776129_0099Search in Google Scholar
Selten, Reinhard & Massimo Warglien. 2007. The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(18). 7361–7366.10.1073/pnas.0702077104Search in Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann, Sotaro Kita & Asl Özyürek. 2004. Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science 305. 1779–1782.10.1126/science.1100199Search in Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23. 193–229.10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2Search in Google Scholar
Simner, Julia, Christine Cuskley & Simon Kirby. 2010. What sound does that taste? Cross-modal mappings across gustation and audition. Perception 39. 553–569.10.1068/p6591Search in Google Scholar
Smith, Kenny, Olga Fehér & Nikolaus Ritt. 2014. Eliminating unpredictable linguistic variation through interaction. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane & B. Scassellati (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1461–1466. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar
Sneller, Betsy. 2014. Antagonistic contact and inverse affiliation: Appropriation of /TH/-fronting by White speakers in South Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20. 2.Search in Google Scholar
Sneller, Betsy & Gareth Roberts. 2016. Alien species and alienable traits: An artificial language game investigating the spread of cultural variants between antagonistic groups. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman & J. C. Trueswel (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1211–1216. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar
Sneller, Betsy & Gareth Roberts. under review. Why some behaviors spread while others don’t: A laboratory simulation of dialect contact.Search in Google Scholar
Squires, Lauren. 2013. It don’t go both ways: Limited bidirectionality in sociolinguistic perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2). 200–237.10.1111/josl.12025Search in Google Scholar
Steels, Luc. 2003. Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Science 7(7). 308–312.10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00129-3Search in Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1982. Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245Search in Google Scholar
Tamariz, Mónica & Simon Kirby. 2016. The cultural evolution of language. Current Opinion in Psychology 8. 37–43.10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.003Search in Google Scholar
Theisen, Carrie A., Jon Oberlander & Simon Kirby. 2010. Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems. Interaction Studies 11(1). 14–32.10.1075/is.11.1.08theSearch in Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 1991. Thought experiments in linguistics. In Tamara Horowitz & Gerald Massey (eds.), Thought experiments in science and philosophy, 247–257. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar
Trendafilov, Dari, Saija Lemmelä & Roderick Murray-Smith. 2010. Negotiation models for mobile tactile interaction. In: Roderick Murray-Smith, editors. In International workshop on mobile social signal processing. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Verhoef, Tessa. 2012. The origins of duality of patterning in artificial whistled languages. Language and Cognition 4(4). 357–380.10.1515/langcog-2012-0019Search in Google Scholar
Verhoef, Tessa, Simon Kirby & Bart De Boer. 2014. Emergence of combinatorial structure and economy through iterated learning with continuous acoustic signals. Journal of Phonetics 43. 57–68.10.1016/j.wocn.2014.02.005Search in Google Scholar
Walker, Abby & Kathryn Campbell-Kibler. 2015. Repeat what after whom? Exploring selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task. Frontiers in Psychology 6(546). 1–18.10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546Search in Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 95–188. Austin/London: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Colin. 2006. Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30(5). 945–982.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_89Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
