Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 2, 2017

Home-range size of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris): a report from two areas in Central Italy

  • Stefano Anile EMAIL logo , Lolita Bizzarri , Moreno Lacrimini , Andrea Sforzi , Bernardino Ragni and Sebastien Devillard
From the journal Mammalia


Although the behavioural ecology of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris) has been studied in several European countries, its home-range size is still poorly known due to elusive behaviour of the species living in typically low population densities. In our study, 11 wildcats from two distinct areas, the Maremma Regional Park (Tuscany; 3 males and 1 female) and the Paradiso di Pianciano Estate (Umbria; 6 males and 1 female), both located in Central Italy, were studied by means of classical VHF radio-tracking. Home ranges were calculated by means of the Brownian bridge movement model (BBMM). Variables significantly affecting home-range size were: study area, gender and the interaction between gender*age. The potential effect of the reproductive season and the nocturnal period was not supported. The main findings indicate that: (1) home-range sizes in Tuscany were larger than those in Umbria; (2) home-range size was positively related to the age of individuals; (3) males exploited larger home ranges than females in all age-classes except for the sub-adult age-class; this latter pattern has never emerged from any previous wildcat radio-telemetry study. Population density, different management regimes in the areas considered and the local abundance of prey may explain differences in home-range sizes between the study areas. The estimated home ranges of wildcats in Umbria were slightly larger than those reported across Europe, while those calculated in the Tuscan study area were significantly greater.


We thank Paul Dylan Hynds and Bernard Patrick for kindly reviewing the English of the manuscript. We also thank the owner of the Paradiso di Piancino private estate, Antonio Bachetoni, the keeper, Bernardino Ciamarra, the former Director of the Maremma Regional Park, Ilio Boschi, all those who collaborated with us in collecting the data in the study areas: Lamberto Bizzarri, Simone Calandri, Paolo Capelletti, Christian Chioso, Domenico Cristofari, Marina Gigante, Andrea Mandrici, Matteo Mariani, Roberta Mazzei, Mariagrazia Possenti, Alberto Sangiuliano, Maria Tiziana Serangeli, Francesca Vercillo, Marco Catello.


Anile, S., B. Ragni, E. Randi, F. Mattucci and F. Rovero. 2014. Wildcat population density on the Etna volcano, Italy: a comparison of density estimation methods. J. Zool. 293: 252–261.10.1111/jzo.12141Search in Google Scholar

Avenant, N.L. and J.A. Nel. 1998. Home-range use, activity, and density of caracal in relation to prey density. Afr. J. Ecol. 36: 347–359.10.1046/j.1365-2028.1998.00152.xSearch in Google Scholar

Barton, K. 2013. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.9.5. Available at: in Google Scholar

Benson, J.F., M.J. Chamberlain and B.D. Leopold. 2006. Regulation of space use in a solitary felid: population density or prey availability? Anim. Behav. 71: 685–693.10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.08.005Search in Google Scholar

Birò, Z., L. Szemethy and M. Heltai. 2004. Home range sizes of wildcats (Felis silvestris) and feral domestic cats (Felis silvestris f. catus) in a hilly region of Hungary. Mamm. Biol. 69: 302–310.10.1078/1616-5047-00149Search in Google Scholar

Bizzarri, L., M. Lacrimini and B. Ragni. 2010. Live capture and handling of the European wildcat in central Italy. Hystrix Ital. J. Mamm. 21: 73–82.Search in Google Scholar

Cheyne, S.M., D.J. Stark, S.H. Limin and D.W. Macdonald. 2013. First estimates of population ecology and threats to Sunda clouded leopards Neofelis diardi in a peat-swamp forest, Indonesia. Endanger Species Res 22: 1–9.10.3354/esr00525Search in Google Scholar

Corbett, L.K. 1979. Feeding ecology and social organization of wildcats (Felis silvestris) and domestic cats (Felis catus) in Scotland. PhD Thesis. University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.Search in Google Scholar

Daniels, M.J., M.A. Beaumont, P.J. Johnson, D. Balharry, D.W. Macdonald and E. Barratt. 2001. Ecology and genetics of wild-living cats in the north-east of Scotland and the implications for the conservation of the wildcat. J. Appl. Ecol. 38: 146–161.10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00580.xSearch in Google Scholar

Di Bitetti, M.S., A. Paviolo and C.D. De Angelo. 2006. Density, habitat use and activity patterns of ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) in the Atlantic Forest of Misiones, Argentina. J. Zool. 270: 153–163.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00102.xSearch in Google Scholar

Germain, E., S. Benhamou and M.L. Poulle. 2008. Spatio-temporal sharing between the European wildcat, the domestic cat and their hybrids. J. Zool. 276: 195–203.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00479.xSearch in Google Scholar

Harmsen, B.J., R.J. Foster, S.C. Silver, L.E.T. Ostro and C.P. Doncaster. 2010. Jaguar and puma activity patterns in relation to their main prey. Mamm. Biol. 76: 320–324.10.1016/j.mambio.2010.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Herfindal, I., J.D. Linnell, J. Odden, E.B. Nilsen and R. Andersen. 2005. Prey density, environmental productivity and home-range size in the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx). J. Zool. 265: 63–71.10.1017/S0952836904006053Search in Google Scholar

Horne, J.S., E.O. Garton, S.M. Krone and J.S. Lewis. 2007. Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecol. 88: 2354–2363.10.1890/06-0957.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Jerosch, S., M. Gotz, N. Klar and R. Mechthild. 2010. Characteristics of diurnal resting sites of the endangered European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris): implications for its conservation. J. Nat. Conserv. 18: 45–54.10.1016/j.jnc.2009.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Kery, M., B. Gardner, T. Stoeckle, D. Weber and J.A. Royle. 2011. Use of spatial capture-recapture modelling and DNA data to estimate densities of elusive animals. Conserv. Biol. 25: 356–364.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01616.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Klar, N., F. Néstor, S. Kramer-Schadt, M. Herrmann, M. Trinzen, I. Buttner and C. Niemitz. 2008. Habitat selection models for European wildcat conservation. Biol. Conserv. 141: 308–319.10.1016/j.biocon.2007.10.004Search in Google Scholar

Klar, N., M. Herrmann and S. Kramer-Schadt. 2009. Effects and mitigation of road impacts on individual movement behaviour of wildcats. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 73: 631–638.10.2193/2007-574Search in Google Scholar

Kranstauber, B., R. Kays, S.D. LaPoint, M. Wikelski and K. Kamran Safi. 2012. A dynamic Brownian bridge movement model to estimate utilization distributions for heterogeneous animal movement. J. Anim. Ecol. 81: 738–746.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01955.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Lecis, R., M. Pierpaoli, Z. Birò, L. Szemethy, B. Ragni, F. Vercillo and E. Randi. 2006. Bayesian analyses of admixture in wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) using linked microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. 15: 119–131.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02812.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

Litvaitis, J., J. Sherburne and J. Bissonette. 1986. Bobcat habitat use and home range size in relation to prey density. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 50: 110–117.10.2307/3801498Search in Google Scholar

LOAS™. 2004. Ecological Software Solutions LLC. Version 3.0.1.Search in Google Scholar

Lozano, J. and A.F. Malo. 2012. Conservation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Mediterranean environments: a reassessment of current threats. In: (G.S. Williams, ed.) Mediterranean Ecosystem: dynamics, management and conservation. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY. pp. 1–31.Search in Google Scholar

Lozano, J., E. Virgos, S. Cabezas-Diaz and J.C. Mangas. 2007. Increase of large game species in mediterranean areas: is the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) facing a new threat? Biol. Conserv. 138: 321–329.10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.027Search in Google Scholar

Lucherini, M., J.I. Reppucci, R.S. Walker, M.L. Villalba, A. Wurstten, G. Gallardo, A. Iriarte, R. Villalobos and P. Perovic. 2009. Activity pattern segregation of carnivores in the high Andes. J. Mammal. 90: 1404–1409.10.1644/09-MAMM-A-002R.1Search in Google Scholar

Mattucci, F., R. Oliveira, L. Bizzarri, F. Vercillo, S. Anile, B. Ragni, L. Lapini, A. Sforzi, P.C. Alves, L.A. Lyons and E. Randi. 2013. Genetic structure of wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in Italy. Ecol. Evol. 3: 2443–2458.10.1002/ece3.569Search in Google Scholar

Monterroso, P., J.C. Brito, P. Ferreras and P.C. Alves. 2009. Spatial ecology of the European wildcat in a Mediterranean ecosystem: dealing with small radio-tracking datasets in species conservation. J. Zool. 279: 27–35.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00585.xSearch in Google Scholar

Nowell, K. and P. Jackson. 1996. Status survey and conservation action plan wild cats. IUCN Publication Services Unit, Cambridge. pp. 383.Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, R., R. Godinho, E. Randi, N. Ferrand and P.C. Alves. 2008a. Hybridization versus conservation: are domestic cats threatening the genetic integrity of wildcats (Felis silvestris silvestris) in Iberian peninsula? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 363: 2953–2961.10.1098/rstb.2008.0052Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Oliveira, R., R. Godinho, E. Randi, N. Ferrand and P.C. Alves. 2008b. Molecular analysis of hybridisation between wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) in Portugal: implications for conservation. Conserv. Genet. 9: 1–11.10.1007/s10592-007-9297-zSearch in Google Scholar

Pesenti, E. and F. Zimmermann. 2013. Density estimations of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in the Swiss alps. J. Mammal. 94: 73–81.10.1644/11-MAMM-A-322.1Search in Google Scholar

Pierpaoli, M., Z.S. Birò, M. Herrmann, K. Hupe, M. Fernandes, B. Ragni, L. Szemethy and E. Randi. 2003. Genetic distinction of wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in Europe, and hybridization with domestic cats in Hungary. Mol. Ecol. 12: 2585–2598.10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01939.xSearch in Google Scholar

Piñeiro, A., I. Barja, G. Silván and J. Illera. 2012. Effects of tourist pressure and reproduction on physiological stress response in wildcats: management implications for species conservation. Wildl. Res. 39: 532–539.10.1071/WR10218Search in Google Scholar

Ragni, B. 1981. Gatto selvatico. Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777. In: (C. Pavan, ed.) Distribuzione e biologia di 22 specie di Mammiferi in Italia. CNR, Roma (in Italian). pp. 185.Search in Google Scholar

Ragni, B. 2006. Il gatto selvatico. In: (M. Frassinet and F. Petretti, eds.) Salvati dall’Arca, Airplane, Bologna (in Italian). pp. 663.Search in Google Scholar

Ragni, B. and M. Possenti. 1996. Variability of coat-colour and markings system in Felis silvestris. Ital. J. Zool. 63: 285–292.10.1080/11250009609356146Search in Google Scholar

Ragni, B., L. Bizzarri and A. Sforzi. 2007. Methods and problems for the reintroduction of the European wildcat: the case of the Maremma Regional Park. In: (Parco Nazionale della Majella, ed.) From the EU LIFE-projects to guidelines for the reintroduction of threatened species. Campo di Giove (in Italian). pp. 202.Search in Google Scholar

Randi, E., M. Pierpaoli, M. Beaumont, B. Ragni and A. Sforzi. 2001. Genetic identification of wild and domestic cats (Felis silvestris) and their hybrids using bayesian clustering methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 1679–1693.10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003956Search in Google Scholar PubMed

R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: Accessed April 16, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Sarmento, P., J. Cruz, P. Tarroso and C. Fonseca. 2006. Space and habitat selection by female European wildcats (Felis silvestris silvestris). Wildl. Biol. Pract. 2: 79–89.10.2461/wbp.2006.2.10Search in Google Scholar

Say, L., S. Devillard, F. Leger, D. Pontier and S. Ruette. 2012. Distribution and spatial genetic structure of European wildcat in France. Anim. Conserv. 5: 18–27.10.1111/j.1469-1795.2011.00478.xSearch in Google Scholar

Scott, R., N. Easterbee and D. Jefferies. 1992. A radio-tracking study of wildcats in Western Scotland. In: (Council of Europe, ed.) Proceedings of the Seminar on the biology and conservation of the wildcat (Felis silvestris). Nancy, France September 23–25, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

Sforzi, A., L. Bizzarri, B. Ragni and D. Paoloni. 2010. Reconstruction of an European wildcat viable population in the Maremma Regional Park: a twenty years of experience. In: (E. Randi, B. Ragni, L. Bizzarri, N. Agostini and G. Tedaldi, eds.) Proceedings of the Felid Biology and Conservation in Italy Conference. Santa Sofia (FC) November 7–8, 2008. Ente Parco Nazionale Foreste Casentinesi (in Italian).Search in Google Scholar

Soto, C.A. and F. Palomares. 2013. Surprising low abundance of European wildcats in a Mediterranean protected area of southwestern Spain. Mammalia 78: 57–65.10.1515/mammalia-2013-0054Search in Google Scholar

Stahl, P., M. Artois and M.F.A. Aubert. 1998. Organisation spatiale et déplacements des chats forestiers adultes (Felis silvestris, Schreber, 177) en Lorraine. Rev. Ecol (Terre Vie) 43: 113–132.Search in Google Scholar

Teets, D.A. 2003. Predicting sunrise and sunset times. Coll. Math. J. 34: 317–321.10.2307/3595771Search in Google Scholar

Velli, E., M.A. Bologna, S. Castelli, B. Ragni and E. Randi. 2015. Non-invasive monitoring of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris Schreber, 1777): comparative analysis of three different monitoring techniques and evaluation of their integration. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 61: 657–668.10.1007/s10344-015-0936-2Search in Google Scholar

Wittmer, H.U. 2001. Home range size, movements, and habitat utilization of three male European wildcats (Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777) in Saarland and Rheinland-Pfalz (Germany). Mammal. Biol. 66: 365–370.Search in Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, N., A. Kitchener, C. Driscoll and B. Nussberger. 2015. Felis silvestris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T60354712A50652361.en. Available at: Accessed November 28, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Zuur, A.F., E.N. Ieno, N.J. Walker, A.A Saveliev and G.M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York. pp. 574.10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6Search in Google Scholar

Zuur, A.F., E.N. Ieno and C.S. Elphick. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 3–14.10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.xSearch in Google Scholar

Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article (DOI: offers supplementary material.

Received: 2016-4-10
Accepted: 2017-1-17
Published Online: 2017-3-2
Published in Print: 2017-12-20

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.12.2023 from
Scroll to top button