Abstract
We propose the integration of different non-invasive sampling methods to the study of predator-prey interactions. We analyzed the diet of the wolf (Canis lupus) to point out its elective prey and we investigated its spatial and temporal interactions with prey species from December 2012 to November 2014 in the Ligurian Alps (Southern Alps, Italy). In this area, the wolf is the only large predator, and there is a rich wild ungulate community consisting of four species. Our analyses showed that the most consumed species by wolves were the wild boar (Sus scrofa) and the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). To successfully hunt these species, wolves need to share their spatial range, searching for them in the most suitable habitat types and in the periods of the diel cycle during which they are mainly active. Fallow deer (Dama dama) and chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) consumption was low, and wolves showed also relatively low overlap with these species. Our results suggest that wolves might be firstly specialized on wild boar predation, as they showed substantial spatial and temporal overlap with this species, and secondly on roe deer predation, especially during the denning season when they probably take advantage of the presence of fawns.
Acknowledgments
We thank A. Biondo, G. Cristiani, and F. Zucca for their fieldwork collaboration. P. Thomas kindly revised the English language improving the clarity of the manuscript. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments to the draft of the manuscript. The collection of data was supported by the project “Il Lupo in Liguria” (2012–2014), funded and promoted by the Regional Administration of Liguria (ROP/ ERDF funds) and coordinated by the Antola Regional Park.
Appendix
Variables used to assess preference or avoidance for different habitat types by the wolf and wild ungulates in the Ligurian Alps.
Habitat | Name | Description |
---|---|---|
Urban areas | Urb | Villages, industrial areas, transport units, artificial and urban parks |
Broad-leaved forest | BF | |
Coniferous forest | CF | |
Mixed forest | MF | |
Pastures | Pas | Pastures and natural grasslands |
Cultivated lands | Cul | Arable lands and permanent crops |
Sclerophyllous vegetation | Scl | |
Scrublands | Shr | |
Transitional woodland-shrub | W/S | Areas with sparsely wooded vegetation and ecotonal areas |
Water bodies | Wat |
References
Aanes, R., J.D.C. Linnell, K. Perzanowski, J. Karlsen and J. Odden. 1998. Roe deer as a prey. In: (R. Andersen, P. Duncan and J.D.C. Linnell, eds.) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo. pp. 141–159.Search in Google Scholar
Ancrenaz, M., A.J. Hearn, J. Ross, R. Sollmann and A. Wilting. 2012. Handbook for wildlife monitoring using camera-traps. Sabah, Malaysai. pp. 71.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral. Ecol. 26: 32–46.10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.xSearch in Google Scholar
Bang, P. and P. Dahlstrøm. 2006. Animal tracks and signs. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 264.Search in Google Scholar
Barabesi, L. and L. Fattorini. 2013. Random versus stratified location of transect and points in distance sampling: theoretical results and practical considerations. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 20: 215–236.10.1007/s10651-012-0216-1Search in Google Scholar
Barabesi, L. and S. Franceschi. 2011. Sampling properties of spatial total estimators under tessellation stratified design. Environmetrics 22: 271–278.10.1002/env.1046Search in Google Scholar
Barber-Meyer, S.M. and L.D. Mech. 2008. Factors influencing predation on juvenile ungulates and natural selection implications. Wildl. Biol. Pract. 4: 8–29.10.2461/wbp.2008.4.2Search in Google Scholar
Barja, I. 2009. Prey and prey-age preference by the Iberian wolf Canis lupus signatus in a multiple-prey ecosystem. Wildlife Biol. 15: 147–154.10.2981/07-096Search in Google Scholar
Basille, M., D. Fortin, C. Dussault, J.P. Ouellet and R. Courtois. 2013. Ecologically based definition of seasons clarifies predator-prey interactions. Ecography 36: 220–229.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07367.xSearch in Google Scholar
Berger, K.M. and E.M. Gese. 2007. Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes? J. Anim. Ecol. 76: 1075–1085.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01287.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Boitani, L. 1992. Wolf research and conservation in Italy. Biol. Conserv. 61: 125–132.10.1016/0006-3207(92)91102-XSearch in Google Scholar
Bongi, P., S. Ciuti, S. Grignolio, M. Del Frate, S. Simi, D. Gandelli and M. Apollonio. 2008. Anti-predator behaviour, space use and habitat selection in female roe deer during the fawning season in a wolf area. J. Zool. 276: 242–251.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00481.xSearch in Google Scholar
Breitenmoser, U. 1998. Large predators in the Alps: the fall and rise of man’s competitors. Biol. Conserv. 83: 279–289.10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00084-0Search in Google Scholar
Brunner, H. and B.J. Coman. 1974. The identification of mammalian hair. Inkata Press, Melbourne. pp. 176.Search in Google Scholar
Calenge, C. 2011. Home range estimation in R: the “adehabitatHR” package. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/adehabitatHR/vignettes/adehabitatHR.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Caniglia, R., E. Fabbri, M. Galaverni, P. Milanesi and E. Randi. 2014. Noninvasive sampling and genetic variability, pack structure, and dynamics in an expanding wolf population. J. Mammal. 95: 41–59.10.1644/13-MAMM-A-039Search in Google Scholar
Capitani, C., I. Bertelli, P. Varuzza, M. Scandura and M. Apollonio. 2004. A comparative analysis of wolf (Canis lupus) diet in three different Italian ecosystems. Mammal. Biol. 69: 1–10.10.1078/1616-5047-112Search in Google Scholar
Ciucci, P., L. Boitani, F. Francisci and G. Andreoli. 1997. Home range, activity and movements of a wolf pack in central Italy. J. Zool. 243: 803–819.10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb01977.xSearch in Google Scholar
Creel, S., J.J. Winnie, B. Maxwell, K. Hamlin and M. Creel. 2005. Elk alter habitat selection as an antipredator response to wolves. Ecology 86: 3387–3397.10.1890/05-0032Search in Google Scholar
Curio, E. 1976. The ethology of predation. Springer, Berlin.10.1007/978-3-642-81028-2Search in Google Scholar
De Marinis, A.M. and A. Asprea. 2006. Hair identification key of wild and domestic ungulates from southern Europe. Wildl. Biol. 12: 305–320.10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[305:HIKOWA]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Debrot, S., G. Fivaz, C. Mermod and J.M. Weber. 1982. Atlas des poils de mammifères d’Europe. Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland. pp. 208.Search in Google Scholar
EEA. 2016. Corine land cover 2012. Retrieved from: http://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc-2012/viewSearch in Google Scholar
Endler, J.A. 1991. Interactions between predators and prey. In: (J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies, eds.) Behavioural ecology. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science Publishing, Oxford. pp. 169–196.Search in Google Scholar
Eriksen, A., P. Wabakken, B. Zimmermann, H.P. Andreassen, J.M. Arnemo, H. Gundersen, O. Liberg, J. Linnell, J.M. Milner, H.C. Pedersen, H. Sand, E.J. Solberg and T. Storaas. 2011. Activity patterns of predator and prey: a simultaneous study of GPS-collared wolves and moose. Anim. Behav. 81: 423–431.10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.011Search in Google Scholar
Fabbri, E., C. Miquel, V. Lucchini, A. Santini, R. Caniglia, C. Duchamp, J.M. Weber, B. Lequette, F. Marucco, L. Boitani, L. Fumagalli, P. Taberlet and E. Randi. 2007. From the Apennines to the Alps: colonization genetics of the naturally expanding Italian wolf (Canis lupus) population. Mol. Ecol. 16: 1661–1671.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03262.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Feinsinger, P., E.E. Spears and R.W. Poole. 1981. A simple measure of niche breadth. Ecology 62: 27–32.10.2307/1936664Search in Google Scholar
Fieberg, J. and C.O. Kochanny. 2005. Quantifying home-range overlap: the importance of the utilization distribution. J. Wildl. Manage. 69: 1346–1359.10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1346:QHOTIO]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Find’o, S. and B. Chovancová. 2004. Home ranges of two wolf packs in the Slovak Carpathians. Folia. Zool. 53: 17–26.Search in Google Scholar
Fuller, T.K. 1991. Effect of snow depth on wolf activity and prey selection in north central Minnesota. Can. J. Zool. 69: 283–287.10.1139/z91-044Search in Google Scholar
Gazzola, A., I. Bertelli, E. Avanzinelli, A. Tolosano, P. Bertotto and M. Apollonio. 2005. Predation by wolves (Canis lupus) on wild and domestic ungulates of the western Alps, Italy. J. Zool. 266: 205–213.10.1017/S0952836905006801Search in Google Scholar
Gerard, J.F., Y. Le Pendu, M.L. Maublanc, J.P. Vincent, M.L. Poulle and C. Cibien. 1995. Large group formation in European roe deer: an adaptative feature? Rev. Ecol. (Terre de vie) 50: 391–401.10.3406/revec.1995.2186Search in Google Scholar
Harmsen, B.J., R.J. Foster, S.C. Silver, L.E. Ostro and C.P. Doncaster. 2011. Jaguar and puma activity patterns in relation to their main prey. Mammal. Biol. 76: 320–324.10.1016/j.mambio.2010.08.007Search in Google Scholar
Hass, C.C. 2009. Competition and coexistence in sympatric bobcats and pumas. J. Zool. 278: 174–180.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00565.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hebblewhite, M. and D.H. Pletscher. 2002. Effects of elk group size on predation by wolves. Can. J. Zool. 80: 800–809.10.1139/z02-059Search in Google Scholar
Hewison, A.J.M., J.P. Vincent and D. Reby. 1998. Social organization of European roe deer. In: (R. Andersen, P. Duncan and J.D.J. Linnell, eds.) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo. pp: 189–219.Search in Google Scholar
Huggard, D.J. 1993. Prey selectivity of wolves in Banff National Park. I. Prey species. Can. J. Zool. 71: 130–139.10.1139/z93-019Search in Google Scholar
Hurlbert, S.H. 1978. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 67–77.10.2307/1936632Search in Google Scholar
Imbert, C., R. Caniglia, E. Fabbri, P. Milanesi, E. Randi, M. Serafini, E. Torretta and A. Meriggi. 2016. Why do wolves eat livestock? Factors influencing wolf diet in northern Italy. Biol. Conserv. 195: 156–168.10.1016/j.biocon.2016.01.003Search in Google Scholar
Ivlev, V.S. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.Search in Google Scholar
Jędrzejewska, B., H. Okarma, W. Jędrzejewski and L. Milkowski. 1994. Effects of exploitation and protection on forest structure, ungulate density and wolf predation in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland. J. Appl. Ecol. 31: 664–676.10.2307/2404157Search in Google Scholar
Jędrzejewski, W., K. Schmidt, J. Theuerkauf, B. Jędrzejewska and H. Okarma. 2001. Daily movements and territory use by radio-collared wolves (Canis lupus) in Białowieża Primeval Forest in Poland. Can. J. Zool. 79: 1993–2004.10.1139/z01-147Search in Google Scholar
Jędrzejewski, W., K. Schmidt, J. Theuerkauf, B. Jędrzejewska, N. Selva, K. Zub and L. Szymura. 2002. Kill rates and predation by wolves on ungulate populations in Białowieża Primeval Forest (Poland). Ecology 83: 1341–1356.10.2307/3071948Search in Google Scholar
Jędrzejewski, W., B. Jędrzejewska, B. Zawadzka, B. Borowik, S. Nowak and R.W. Mysłajek. 2008. Habitat suitability model for Polish wolves based on long-term national census. Anim. Conserv. 11: 377–390.10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00193.xSearch in Google Scholar
Jenny, D. and K. Zuberbühler. 2005. Hunting behaviour in West African forest leopards. Afr. J. Ecol. 43: 197–200.10.1111/j.1365-2028.2005.00565.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kelly, M.J. and E.L. Holub. 2008. Camera trapping of carnivores: trap success among camera types and across species, and habitat selection by species, on Salt Pond Mountain, Giles County, Virginia. Northeast. Nat. 15: 249–262.10.1656/1092-6194(2008)15[249:CTOCTS]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Krebs, C.J. 1999. Ecological methodology. Menlo Park, California. pp. 620.Search in Google Scholar
Kruuk, H. and T. Parish. 1981. Feeding specialization of the European badger Meles meles in Scotland. J. Anim. Ecol. 50: 773–788.10.2307/4136Search in Google Scholar
Leblond, M., C. Dussault, J.P. Ouellet and M.H. St-Laurent. 2016. Caribou avoiding wolves face increased predation by bears – Caught between Scylla and Charybdis. J. Appl. Ecol. 53: 1078–1087.10.1111/1365-2664.12658Search in Google Scholar
Linkie, M. and M.S. Ridout. 2011. Assessing tiger–prey interactions in Sumatran rainforests. J. Zool. 284: 224–229.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00801.xSearch in Google Scholar
Linnell, J.D.C. and R. Andersen. 1995. Site tenacity in roe deer. Short-term effects of logging. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 23: 31–36.Search in Google Scholar
Linnell, J.D.C., K. Wahlström and J.M. Gaillard. 1998. From birth to independence: birth, growth, neonatal mortality, hiding behaviour and dispersal. In: (R. Andersen, P. Duncan, J.D.J. Linnell, eds.) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo. pp. 257–283.Search in Google Scholar
Lucchini, V., E. Fabbri, F. Marucco, S. Ricci, L. Boitani and E. Randi. 2002. Noninvasive molecular tracking of colonizing wolf (Canis lupus) packs in the western Italian Alps. Mol. Ecol. 11: 857–868.10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01489.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Lund, U., C. Agostinelli and M.C. Agostinelli. 2013. Package “circular”. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/circular/circular.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
MacNulty, D.R., D.W. Smith, L.D. Mech and L.E. Eberly. 2009. Body size and predatory performance in wolves: is bigger better? J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 532–539.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01517.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Manly, B.F.J., L.L. McDonald, D.L. Thomas, T.L. McDonald and W.P. Erickson. 2002. Resource selection by animals: statistical analysis and design for field studies. Kluwer, Dordrecht. pp. 219.Search in Google Scholar
Mattioli, L., M. Apollonio, V. Mazzarone and E. Centofanti. 1995. Wolf food habits and wild ungulate availability in the Foreste Casentinesi National Park, Italy. Acta Theriol. 40: 387–402.10.4098/AT.arch.95-36Search in Google Scholar
Mattioli, L., C. Capitani, E. Avanzinelli, I. Bertelli, A. Gazzola and M. Apollonio. 2004. Predation by wolves (Canis lupus) on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in north-eastern Apennine, Italy. J. Zool. 264: 249–258.10.1017/S095283690400576XSearch in Google Scholar
Mattioli, L., C. Capitani, A. Gazzola, M. Scandura and M. Apollonio. 2011. Prey selection and dietary response by wolves in a high-density multi-species ungulate community. Eur. J. Wildlife. Res. 57: 909–922.10.1007/s10344-011-0503-4Search in Google Scholar
Mech, L.D. 1970. The Wolf: the ecology and behavior of an endangered species. The Natural History Press, New York. pp. 384.Search in Google Scholar
Mech, L.D. and R.O. Peterson. 2003. Wolf-prey relations. In: (L.D. Mech and L. Boitani, eds.) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 131–157.10.7208/chicago/9780226516981.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mech, L.D., D.W. Smith and D.R. MacNulty. 2015. Wolves on the hunt: the behavior of wolves hunting wild prey. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 187.10.7208/chicago/9780226255286.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Meredith, M. and M. Ridout. 2014. Overview of the “overlap” package. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/overlap/vignettes/overlap.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, A. and S. Lovari. 1996. A review of wolf predation in southern Europe: does the wolf prefer wild prey to livestock? J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 1561–1571.10.2307/2404794Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, A., P. Rosa, A. Brangi and C. Matteucci. 1991. Habitat use and diet of the wolf in northern Italy. Acta. Theriol. 36: 141–151.10.4098/AT.arch.91-11Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, A., A. Brangi, C. Matteucci and O. Sacchi. 1996. The feeding habits of wolves in relation to large prey availability in northern Italy. Ecography 19: 287–295.10.1111/j.1600-0587.1996.tb01256.xSearch in Google Scholar
Meriggi, A., A. Brangi, L. Schenone, D. Signorelli and P. Milanesi. 2011. Changes of wolf (Canis lupus) diet in Italy in relation to the increase of wild ungulate abundance. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 23: 195–210.10.1080/03949370.2011.577814Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, A., P. Milanesi, L. Schenone, D. Signorelli, M. Serafini, E. Torretta, F. Puopolo, M. Zanzottera, E. Randi, R. Caniglia and E. Fabbri. 2012. Distribuzione, consistenza e impatto del lupo in Liguria. Strategia di convivenza e gestione dei conflitti. Technical Report, Liguria Region. pp. 165.Search in Google Scholar
Meriggi, A., V. Dagradi, O. Dondina, M. Perversi, P. Milanesi, M. Lombardini, S. Raviglione and A. Repossi. 2015. Short term responses of wolves feeding habits to changes of wild and domestic ungulate abundance in Northern Italy. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 27: 389–411.10.1080/03949370.2014.986768Search in Google Scholar
Milanesi, P., A. Meriggi and E. Merli. 2012. Selection of wild ungulates by wolves Canis lupus (L. 1758) in an area of the Northern Apennines (North Italy). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 24: 81–96.10.1080/03949370.2011.592220Search in Google Scholar
Monterroso, P., P.C. Alves and P. Ferreras. 2014. Plasticity in circadian activity patterns of mesocarnivores in Southwestern Europe: implications for species coexistence. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68: 1403–1417.10.1007/s00265-014-1748-1Search in Google Scholar
Nores, C., L. Llaneza and M.A. Álvarez. 2008. Wild boar Sus scrofa mortality by hunting and wolf Canis lupus predation: an example in northern Spain. Wildlife. Biol. 14: 44–51.10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[44:WBSSMB]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Nowak, S., R.W. Mysłajek, A. Kłosińska and G. Gabryś. 2011. Diet and prey selection of wolves (Canis lupus) recolonising Western and Central Poland. Mammal Biol 76(6):709–715. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2011.06.007.10.1016/j.mambio.2011.06.007Search in Google Scholar
Peterson, R.O. and Ciucci, P. 2003. The wolf as a carnivore. In: (L.D. Mech and L. Boitani, eds.) Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp. 104–130.Search in Google Scholar
Pewsey, A., M. Neuhäuser and G.D. Ruxton. 2013. Circular statistics in R. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 183.Search in Google Scholar
Poulle, M.L., L. Carles and B. Lequette. 1997. Significance of ungulates in the diet of recently settled wolves in the Mercantour mountains (southeastern France). Revue d’écologie 52: 357–368.10.3406/revec.1997.2238Search in Google Scholar
Ridout, M.S. and M. Linkie. 2009. Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. J. Agr. Biol. Envir. St. 14: 322–337.10.1198/jabes.2009.08038Search in Google Scholar
Sand, H., C. Wikenros, P. Wabakken and O. Liberg. 2006. Effects of hunting group size, snow depth and age on the success of wolves hunting moose. Anim. Behav. 72: 781–789.10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.11.030Search in Google Scholar
Schenone, L., C. Aristarchi and A. Meriggi. 2004. Ecologia del Lupo (Canis lupus) in Provincia di Genova: distribuzione, consistenza, alimentazione e impatto sulla zootecnia. Hystrix It. J. Mamm. 15: 13–30.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, D.W., T.D. Drummer, K.M. Murphy, D.S. Guernsey and S.B. Evans. 2004. Winter prey selection and estimation of wolf kill rates in Yellowstone National Park, 1995–2000. J. Wildl. Manage. 68: 153–166.10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0153:WPSAEO]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Stotyn, S., R. Serrouya and B.N. McLellan. 2005. The predator-prey dynamics of wolves and moose in the northern Columbia Mountains: spatial and functional patterns in relation to mountain caribou decline. The Columbia basin fish and wildlife compensation program and the British Columbia forest science program. British Columbia, Canada. pp. 22.Search in Google Scholar
Teerink, B.J. 1991. Hair of West European mammals: atlas and identification key. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 236.Search in Google Scholar
Theuerkauf, J. 2009. What drives wolves: fear or hunger? Humans, diet, climate and wolf activity patterns. Ethology 115: 649–657.10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01653.xSearch in Google Scholar
Theuerkauf, J., W. Jędrzejewski, K. Schmidt, H. Okarma, I. Ruczyński, S. Stanisław and R. Gula. 2003. Daily patterns and duration of wolf activity in the Białowieża Forest, Poland. J. Mammal. 84: 243–253.10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0243:DPADOW>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar
Valière, N., L. Fumagalli, L. Gielly, C. Miquel, B. Lequette, M.L. Poulle, J.M. Weber, R. Arlettaz and P. Taberlet. 2003. Long-distance wolf recolonization of France and Switzerland inferred from non-invasive genetic sampling over a period of 10 years. Anim. Conserv. 6: 83–92.10.1017/S1367943003003111Search in Google Scholar
Wand, M.P. and M.C. Jones. 1994. Multivariate plugin bandwidth selection. Comput. Stat. 9: 97–116.Search in Google Scholar
Wiebe, N., G. Samelius, R.T. Alisauskas, J.L. Bantle, C. Bergman, R. De Carle, C.J. Hendrickson, A. Lusignan, K.J. Phipps and J. Pitt. 2009. Foraging behaviours and diets of wolves in the Queen Maud Gulf Bird Sanctuary, Nunavut, Canada. Arctic 62: 399–404.10.14430/arctic171Search in Google Scholar
Winnie, J.J. and S. Creel. 2007. Sex-specific behavioural responses of elk to spatial and temporal variation in the threat of wolf predation. Anim. Behav. 73: 215–225.10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.007Search in Google Scholar
Worton, B.J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70: 164–168.10.2307/1938423Search in Google Scholar
Worton, B.J. 1995. Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators. J. Wildl. Manage. 59: 794–800.10.2307/3801959Search in Google Scholar
Zimen, E. and L. Boitani. 1975. Number and distribution of wolves in Italy. Z Säugetierkd 40: 102–111.Search in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston