Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 12, 2020

First photographic records of bush dogs (Speothos venaticus) from camera-traps in Guyana

Matthew T. Hallett ORCID logo, Anthony Roberts, Ashley P. Holland and Angus Jackman
From the journal Mammalia

Abstract

The bush dog (Speothos venaticus) is rare, elusive, and difficult to study in the wild. Guyana contains a wealth of intact tropical forest (∼18.4 million ha) and savanna (1.6 million ha) habitats, but management of this species is hindered by a lack of data. We present two photographic records (consisting of nine individuals) of bush dogs from camera-traps set in the Kanuku Mountains Protected Area (KMPA) – the first of this species in Guyana. These records highlight the importance of Guiana Shield forests and Guyana’s expanding protected areas system to the conservation of these wide-ranging carnivores. Additionally, we recommend that detailed measurement and reporting of site variables become standard, as it will improve the efficacy of camera-trap studies of bush dogs and allow for broad-scale modelling of space use not otherwise possible due to the low detection rates at the scale of each individual study.


Corresponding author: Matthew T. Hallett, Institute for the Environment and Sustainability, Miami University, 118 Shideler Hall, 250 S. Patterson Ave., Oxford, OH 45056, USA; School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, 103 Black Hall, PO Box 116455, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; and Department of Wildlife Ecology & Conservation, University of Florida, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA, E-mail:

Funding source: Phoenix Zoo

Award Identifier / Grant number: Phoenix Zoo Conservation & Science Grant

Funding source: Project Dragonfly

Funding source: Miami University Institute for the Environment & Sustainability

Funding source: Novy Family Foundation

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the leadership and residents of Yupukari, Kaicumbay, Katoka, Moco Moco, Nappi, Shulinab, Meriwau, Quiko, and Sand Creek villages for their kindness, generosity, and cooperation. We are grateful to the EPA, MoIPA, PAC, and KMCRG for issuing permissions to carry out this study. Special thanks to Brittany Bankovich, John Blake, Eric Köppen, and Frank Judge for their guidance and support.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: We are grateful for funding provided by the Phoenix Zoo, Project Dragonfly & IES at Miami University, and the Novy Family Foundation.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Arino, O., Ramos Perez, J.J., Kalogirou, V., Bontemps, S., Defourny, P., and Van Bogart, E. (2012). Global land cover Map for 2009 (GlobCover 2009). European Space Agency (ESA) and Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Belgium. Search in Google Scholar

Barnett, A., Shapley, R., and Engstrom, M. (2001). Records of the bush dog, Speothos venaticus (Lund, 1842), from Guyana. Mammalia 65: 232–237. Search in Google Scholar

Beisiegel, B.M. and Zuercher, G.L. (2005). Speothos venaticus. Mamm. Species 783: 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1644/783.1. Search in Google Scholar

Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conserv. Biol. 18: 621–630.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x. Search in Google Scholar

Bicknell, J.E., Struebig, M.J., and Davies, Z.G. (2015). Reconciling timber extraction with biodiversity conservation in tropical forests using reduced‐impact logging. J. Appl. Ecol. 52: 379–388.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12391. Search in Google Scholar

Bicknell, J.E., Collins, M.B., Pickles, R.S., Mccann, N.P., Bernard, C.R., Fernandes, D.J., Miller, M.G.R., James, S.M., Williams, A.U., Struebig, M.J., et al. (2017). Designing protected area networks that translate international conservation commitments into national action. Biol. Conserv. 214: 168–175.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.08.024. Search in Google Scholar

Brooks, T.M., Mittermeier, R.A., Da Fonseca, G.A., Gerlach, J., Hoffmann, M., Lamoreux, J.F., Mittermeier, C.G., Pilgrim, J.D., and Rodrigues, A.S. (2006). Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313: 58–61.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127609. Search in Google Scholar

Carvalho, F.M., Júnior, P.D.M., and Ferreira, L.G. (2009). The Cerrado into-pieces: habitat fragmentation as a function of landscape use in the savannas of central Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 142: 1392–1403.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.01.031. Search in Google Scholar

DeMatteo, K.E. (2008). Using a survey of carnivore conservationists to gain insight into the ecology and conservation status of the bush dog. Canid News 11: 3. Search in Google Scholar

DeMatteo, K.E. and Loiselle, B.A. (2008). New data on the status and distribution of the bush dog (Speothos venaticus): evaluating its quality of protection and directing research efforts. Biol. Conserv. 141: 2494–2505.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.010. Search in Google Scholar

DeMatteo, K.E., Michalski, F., and Leite-Pitman, M.R.P. (2011). Speothos venaticus. IUCN red list of threatened species v, http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/20468/0 (Accessed 10 November 2019.2013). Search in Google Scholar

ESRI (2016). ArcGIS desktop: Release 10.4.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands (CA), USA. Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, J., Arora, P., and Rhee, S. (2018). Conserving tropical forests: can sustainable livelihoods outperform artisanal or informal mining? Sustainability 10: 2586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082586. Search in Google Scholar

Guyana Forestry Commission (GFC) (2012). Guyana REDD + monitoring reporting & verification system (MRVS) interim measures report 01 october 2010 – 31 December 2011, Version 3, https://theredddesk.org/countries/guyana/statistics (Accessed 2 November 2019). Search in Google Scholar

Guyana Forestry Commission (GFC) (2017). Guyana REDD+ monitoring reporting and verification system (MRVS): year 6 interim measures report. Georgetown, Guyana, https://forestry.gov.gy/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/MRVS-Interim-Measures-Report-Year-6-Version-3.pdf (Accessed 2 November 2019). Search in Google Scholar

Guyana Forestry Commission (GFC). 2018. Annual Report 2017. Guyana Forestry Commission. Georgetown, Guyana, https://nre.gov.gy/2019/05/08/guyana-forestry-commission-annual-report-2017-2/. (Accessed 2 November 2019). Search in Google Scholar

Guyana Lands and Surveys Commission (GLSC) (2013). Guyana national land use plan. Georgetown, Guyana, https://goinvest.gov.gy/wp-content/uploads/GuyanaNLUP.pdf (Accessed 22 December 2019). Search in Google Scholar

Hallett, M.T. Population density of jaguars (Panthera onca) in the Kanuku Mountains, Guyana, Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Miami University, Oxford, Ohio. Search in Google Scholar

Hammond, D.S. (2005). Tropical forests of the Guiana Shield: ancient forests in a modern world. CABI Publishing, UK. Search in Google Scholar

Hammond, D.S., Gond, V., De Thoisy, B., Forget, P.M., and Dedijn, B.P. (2007). Causes and consequences of a tropical forest gold rush in the Guiana Shield, South America. AMBIO A J. Hum. Environ. 36: 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[661:CACOAT]2.0.CO;2. Search in Google Scholar

Hilson, G. and Laing, T. (2017). Guyana gold: a unique resource curse?. J. Dev. Stud. 53: 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1160066. Search in Google Scholar

Jetz, W., Carbone, C., Fulford, J., and Brown, J.H. (2004). The scaling of animal space use. Science 306: 266–268. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102138. Search in Google Scholar

Karanth, K.U. and Nichols, J.D. (1998). Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79: 2852–2862. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2852:EOTDII]2.0.CO;2. Search in Google Scholar

Laurance, W.F., Goosem, M., and Laurance, S.G. (2009). Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24: 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009. Search in Google Scholar

Le Saout, S., Hoffman, M., Shi, Y., Hughes, A., Bernard, C., Brooks, T.M., Bertzky, B., Butchart, S.H.M., Stuart, S.N., Badman, T., et al. (2013). Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science 342: 803–805. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239268. Search in Google Scholar

Lima, E., DeMatteo, K.E., Jorge, R.S.P., Cesar Dalponte, J., Souza Lima, H., and Klorfine, S.A. (2012). First telemetry study of bush dogs: home range, activity and habitat selection. Wildl. Res. 39: 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR11176. Search in Google Scholar

Lima, E.S., Jorge, M.L.S., Jorge, R.S., and Morato, R.G. (2015). The bush dog Speothos venaticus: area requirement and habitat use in cultivated lands. Oryx 49: 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605314000076. Search in Google Scholar

Lund, P.W. (1842). Blik paa Brasiliens Dyreverden för sidste jordomvaeltning. Fjerde Afhandling: Fortsaettelse af Pattedyrene. Lagoa Santa d. 30 Januar 1841., 9. Danske videnskabernes Selskabs naturvidenskapelige og mathematiske Afhandlinger, Copenhagen, pp. 137–208. Search in Google Scholar

Mackenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Royle, J.A., Pollock, K.H., Baily, L.L., and Hines, J.E. (2006). Occupancy estimation and modelling. Elsevier, San Diego, California, USA. Search in Google Scholar

Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., Brooks, T.M., Pilgrim, J.D., Konstant, W.R., Da Fonseca, G. A., and Kormos, C. (2003). Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 100: 10309–10313. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1732458100. Search in Google Scholar

O’Brien, T.G. (2011). Abundance, density and relative abundance: a conceptual framework. In: O’Connell, A.F., Nichols, J.D., and Karanth, K.U. (Eds.), Camera traps in animal ecology. Springer, Tokyo, pp. 71–96. Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, T.G. (2009). Distribution, habitat utilization and conservation of the vulnerable bush dog Speothos venaticus in northern Brazil. Oryx 43: 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605307002347. Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, T.G., Michalski, F., Botelho, A.L., Michalski, L.J., Calouro, A.M., and Desbiez, A.L. (2018). How rare is rare? Quantifying and assessing the rarity of the bush dog Speothos venaticus across the Amazon and other biomes. Oryx 52: 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000624. Search in Google Scholar

Puran, A., Paemelaere, E.A.D, and Ali, R. (2017). Wildmeat consumption on the coast of Guyana. 28th international congress for conservation biology. Cartagena, Colombia, pp. 23–27, July 2017. Search in Google Scholar

Roopsind, A., Caughlin, T., Sambu, H., Fragoso, J., and Putz, J. (2017). Logging and indigenous hunting impacts on persistence of large Neotropical animals. Biotropica 49: 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12446. Search in Google Scholar

Roopsind, A., Sohngen, B., and Brandt, J. (2019). Evidence that a national REDD+ program reduces tree cover loss and carbon emissions in a high forest cover, low deforestation country. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 116: 24492–24499. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904027116. Search in Google Scholar

Silver, S. (2004). Assessing jaguar abundance using remotely triggered cameras. Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, USA. Search in Google Scholar

Vieira, R. (2006). Mercury-free gold mining technologies: possibilities for adoption in the Guianas. J. Clean. Prod. 14: 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.09.007. Search in Google Scholar

Watson, J.E.M., Shanahan, D.F., DiMarco, M., Allan, J., Laurance, W.F., Sanderson, E.W., Mackey, B., and Venter, O. (2016). Catastrophic Declines in wilderness areas undermine globe environment targets. Curr. Biol. 26: 2929–2934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.08.049. Search in Google Scholar

Zuercher, G. L., Gipson, P. S., and Carrillo, O. (2005). Diet and habitat associations of bush dogs Speothos venaticus in the Interior Atlantic Forest of eastern Paraguay. Oryx 39: 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605305000153. Search in Google Scholar

Supplementary material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2019-0111).

Received: 2019-10-01
Accepted: 2020-08-04
Published Online: 2020-10-12
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston