Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 10, 2020

Species richness and ethnozoological annotations on mammals at the Boanamo indigenous community, Waorani territory, Orellana and Pastaza provinces, Ecuador

Diego G. Tirira ORCID logo, Harold F. Greeney ORCID logo, Conan Omaca, Otobo Baihua and Ryan P. Killackey ORCID logo
From the journal Mammalia

Abstract

We present the results of a rapid ecological assessment conducted in 2012 in the community of Boanamo, in the Waorani Ethnic Reserve and Yasuní National Park, Orellana and Pastaza provinces, Ecuadorian Amazon. The study included surveys and observations of mammals by different methodologies over a 16-day sampling period. The results show the presence of 89 species of mammals, but there are several other mammal species expected in the area, increasing the projected diversity to 119 species, a high diverse community when compared with similar locations. Statistical analyses show that Boanamo is an area of high species richness and heterogeneity, consistent with comparable surveys in other areas of primary lowland rainforest in Amazonia. In addition, we documented nine distinct ways and 130 different usages in which 43 species are utilized in Boanamo. To estimate the importance of mammal diversity, we used a Cultural Importance Index, which shows that the species with the highest value are Panthera onca and Nasua nasua. However, the most frequently hunted species were Tayassu pecari and Lagothrix lagothricha. Our final conclusion is the community of Boanamo is entirely dependent on the surrounding forest, and mammals are an important part of their culture and subsistence.


Corresponding author: Diego G. Tirira, Fundación Mamíferos y Conservación, Urb. Hacienda Capelo 165, Capelo, Rumiñahui, Ecuador, E-mail:

Appendix 1:

Species and use of mammals recorded in the indigenous community of Boanamo, Yasuní National Park and Waorani Ethnic Reserve, Ecuador.

No.Order, family and speciesType of recordNumber of records1AbundanceKind of useCIConservation categoryComments (S2 Text)Pictures (S3 Plates)
EcuadorIUCN
DIDELPHIMORPHIA
Didelphidae
1Caluromys lanatusRW0R20.0DDLCYes
2Didelphis marsupialisDO1U1, 5, 7, 91.8LCLCYes
3Marmosa waterhouseiDO1U0.0LCNEYes
4Marmosops bishopiDO1U0.0NELCYes
5Philander andersoniDO2U0.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 1(a)
SIRENIA
Trichechidae
6Trichechus inunguisRW0K20.0CRVUYes
CINGULATA
Chlamyphoridae
7Priodontes maximusTR1R21, 2, 42.5VUVUYes
Dasypodidae
8Dasypus novemcinctusTR5F1, 4, 52.0LCLCYes
PILOSA
Bradypodidae
9Bradypus variegatusDO1K1, 4, 81.3LCLCYes
Megalonychidae
10Choloepus didactylusRW0K1, 4, 7, 81.5LCLCYes
Cyclopedidae
11Cyclopes idaDO1R210.3DDNEYes
Myrmecophagidae
12Myrmecophaga tridactylaDO, TR2U21, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 92.5VUVUYesS3 Plate 1(b)
13Tamandua tetradactylaRW0K1, 2, 91.0LCLCYes
PRIMATES
Callitrichidae
14Cebuella pygmaeaDO, VO1R21, 5, 7, 82.0VUVUYes
15Leontocebus tripartitusDO2U1, 7, 82.3NTNTYes
Cebidae
16Cebus albifronsDO3U1, 5, 7, 82.0NTLCYesS3 Plate 1(c)
17Sapajus macrocephalusRW0R1, 70.5NTLCNo
18Saimiri cassiquiarensisDO, VO2F1, 71.5NTLCYesS3 Plate 1(d)
Aotidae
19Aotus vociferansVO1R1, 7, 81.8NTLCYes
Pitheciidae
20Plecturocebus discolorDO, VO4U1, 71.5NTLCYesS3 Plate 1(e)
21Pithecia napensisDO1R21, 7, 82.3NTLCYes
Atelidae
22Alouatta seniculusDO, CT, VO10F1, 4, 7, 82.8NTLCYesS3 Plate 2(a, b)
23Ateles belzebuthDO5U21, 5, 7, 82.5ENENYesS3 Plate 2(c)
24Lagothrix lagothrichaDO3U21, 5, 7, 82.5ENVUYesS3 Plate 2(d)
RODENTIA
Sciuridae
25Hadrosciurus spadiceusDO2U1, 81.0LCLCYes
26Microsciurus flaviventerDO3U210.3LCDDYesS3 Plate 2(e)
Cricetidae
27Hylaeamys yunganusCaptured1R0.0LCLCYes
28Neacomys rosalindaeCaptured1R20.0LCNEYesS3 Plate 3(a)
29Oecomys bicolorCaptured1R0.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 3(b)
Erethizontidae
30Coendou prehensilisDO, CT2R1, 20.5DDLCYesS3 Plate 3(c)
Caviidae
31Hydrochoerus hydrochaerisDO, TR7F1, 2, 4, 6, 72.0DDLCYesS3 Plate 3(d–e)
Dasyproctidae
32Dasyprocta fuliginosaDO, TR3U1, 7, 92.3LCLCYesS3 Plate 3(f)
33Myoprocta prattiDO, TR3U1, 5, 72.0LCLCYes
Cuniculidae
34Cuniculus pacaDO, TR2U1, 4, 7, 82.5NTLCYes
Echimyidae
35Proechimys brevicaudaDO1R0.0LCLCNo
LAGOMORPHA
Leporidae
36Sylvilagus defilippiDO2U10.5LCNEYes
CHIROPTERA
Emballonuridae
37Rhynchonycteris nasoDO, captured14F20.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 4(a, b)
38Saccopteryx bilineataCaptured1U20.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 4(c, d)
Phyllostomidae
39Desmodus rotundusCaptured1U8, 91.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 5(a)
40Glossophaga soricinaCaptured2U0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 5(b)
41Micronycteris megalotisCaptured1R20.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 5(c)
42Micronycteris minutaCaptured1R20.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 5(d)
43Chrotopterus auritusCaptured1R20.0NTLCNoS3 Plate 5(e)
44Gardnerycteris crenulatumCaptured2U0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 5(f)
45Lophostoma carrikeriCaptured1R20.0DDLCNoS3 Plate 6(a)
46Macrophyllum macrophyllumCaptured1R20.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 6(b)
47Phylloderma stenopsCaptured1R20.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 6(c)
48Phyllostomus elongatusCaptured8F0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 6(d)
49Phyllostomus hastatusCaptured1R0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 6(e)
50Tonatia maresiCaptured1R20.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 6(f)
51Trachops cirrhosusDO, captured3U20.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 7(a)
52Vampyrum spectrumDO1R20.0VUNTNo
53Trinycteris niceforiCaptured1R20.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 7(b)
54Carollia brevicaudaCaptured17C0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 7(c)
55Carollia castaneaCaptured11C0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 7(d)
56Carollia perspicillataCaptured24C0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 7(e)
57Rhinophylla fischeraeCaptured6F0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 7(f)
58Rhinophylla pumilioCaptured17C0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 8(a)
59Sturnira magnaCaptured1R0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 8(b)
60Artibeus obscurusCaptured9F0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 8(c)
61Artibeus planirostrisCaptured26C0.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 8(d)
62Artibeus anderseniCaptured2U0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 8(e)
63Mesophylla macconnelliCaptured1R0.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 8(f)
64Platyrrhinus infuscusCaptured3U0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 9(a)
65Vampyressa thyoneCaptured3U0.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 9(b–c)
66Vampyriscus bidensCaptured2U0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 9(d)
Noctilionidae
67Noctilio albiventrisDO, captured3U20.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 10(a)
Furipteridae
68Furipterus horrensCaptured1R20.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 10(b)
Vespertilionidae
69Myotis albescensCaptured1R0.0LCLCNoS3 Plate 10(c)
70Myotis nigricansCaptured8F0.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 10(d)
71Myotis ripariusCaptured1R0.0LCLCYesS3 Plate 10(e)
CARNIVORA
Felidae
72Herpailurus yagouaroundiRW0R60.3NTLCYes
73Leopardus pardalisCT, TR2U2, 4, 6, 7, 81.8NTLCYes
74Leopardus wiediiRW0K220.3VUNTYes
75Puma concolorRW0K2, 60.5VULCYes
76Panthera oncaTR1R22, 3, 6, 7, 8, 94.3ENNTYes
Canidae
77Atelocynus microtisRW0K20.0NTNTNo
78Speothos venaticusRW0K20.0VUNTYes
Procyonidae
79Nasua nasuaDO1R1, 2, 3, 7, 83.0LCLCYes
80Potos flavusDO, VO6F1, 7, 82.0LCLCYes
Mustelidae
81Lontra longicaudisDO1R70.3VUNTYes
82Pteronura brasiliensisDO1K20.0CRENYes
83Eira barbaraRW0K1, 90.8LCLCYes
PERISSODACTYLA
Tapiridae
84Tapirus terrestrisCT, TR3U21, 2, 4, 7, 82.3ENVUYesS3 Plate 10(f)
ARTIODACTYLA
Tayassuidae
85Pecari tajacuDO2U1, 2, 71.8NTLCYes
86Tayassu pecariDO2U21, 2, 7, 82.8ENVUYesS3 Plate 11(a–d)
Cervidae
87Mazama mureliaDO1R210.5NTNEYes
88Mazama zamoraDO, CT3U1, 6, 7, 82.0NTNEYesS3 Plate 11(e)
Iniidae
89Inia geoffrensisDO1U220.3ENENYes

  1. 1Groups of animals of a same species were recorded as a single individual.

  2. 2Indicator species of good environmental quality.

  3. Type of record: CT = Camera trap. DO = Direct observation. RW = Reported only by residents of the Waorani Community of Boanamo. TR = Tracks (footprints and other traces). VO = Vocalization record. Abundance: C = Common (species abundant and easy to find). F = Frequent (species found periodically even at low densities). U = Uncommon (species difficult to find). R = Rare (species very difficult to find). K = Unknown (species for which there is no information to determine their relative abundance). Kind of use or relation to Waorani: 1 = Food. 2 = Artisanal. 3 = Commercial. 4 = Material. 5 = Medicinal. 6 = Ornamental. 7 = Recreational (as a pet). 8 = Ritual and spiritual beliefs. 9 = Social conflict. CI = Conservation Importance Index. Conservation category (Red lists of Ecuador (Tirira, 2011), and IUCN (2020)): CR = Critically Endangered. DD = Data Deficient. EN = Endangered. LC = Least Concern. NE = Not Evaluated. NT = Near Threatened. VU = Vulnerable.

Acknowledgments

Our research was part of a larger biotic inventory created and funded by Pollywog Productions as part of the documentary feature film, Yasuni Man, and carried out in cooperation with the Waorani communities of Boanamo and Bameno, to whom we wish to express our gratitude, especially to Ñama Baihua and Omayuhue Huane Baihua. To Tomi Sugahara for her invaluable logistical support. We also want to thank Larry Evans, Domingo Gualinga, Diana Medina, Cecilia Puertas, and Morley Read as members of the research team. We are grateful to Ministry of Environment for supporting our requests for all permits (entry permit: 007-2012-FC-MAE-DPO-PNY, and research permit: 005-2012-IC-FAU-MAE-DPO-PNY). To Museum of Zoology QCAZ for allowing us to review the specimens for a correct identification. To Leo Zurita for creating the map of our study site included in Figure 1. We are grateful to Mandy Haywood and Melinda Hoffman for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

  1. Author contributions: DGT wrote the text, field data collection, analysis, and identification of specimens. HFG wrote the text and field data collection. RPK: funding project, field support, logistic organization, and field data collection. CO and OB contributed to field observations and logistical support for the survey.

  2. Research funding: Our research was part of a larger biotic inventory created and funded by Pollywog Productions as part of the documentary feature film Yasuni Man.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Abya-Yala. (1986). Los Shuar y los animales. Ediciones Abya-Yala, Quito. Search in Google Scholar

Albuja, L., and Arguero, S.A. (2011). Mamíferos. In: Albuja, L. (Ed.), Fauna de Guiyero, Parque Nacional Yasuní. EPN and EcoFondo, Quito, pp. 28–63. Search in Google Scholar

Albuja, L., Ibarra, M., Urgilés, J., and Barriga, R. (1980). Estudio preliminar de los vertebrados ecuatorianos. Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito. Search in Google Scholar

Alverson, W.S., Vriesendorp, C., del Campo, A., Debra, K., Moskovits, D.F., Stotz, M., García, D., and Borbor, L.A. (Eds.), (2008). Ecuador-Peru: Cuyabeno-Güeppí. Rapid Biological and Social Inventories Report 20. Field Museum, Chicago, IL. Search in Google Scholar

Basantes, M., Tinoco, N., Velazco, P.M., Hofmann, M.J., Rodríguez-Posada, M.E., and Camacho, M.A. (2020). Systematics and taxonomy of Tonatia saurophila Koopman & Williams, 1951 (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae). ZooKeys 915: 59–86.https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.915.46995. Search in Google Scholar

Bass, M.S., Finer, M., Jenkins, C.N., Kreft, H., Cisneros-Heredia, D.F., McCracken, S.F., Pitman, N.C.A., English, P.H., Swing, K., Villa, G., et al. (2010). Global conservation significance of Ecuador’s Yasuní National Park. PloS One 5: 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008767. Search in Google Scholar

Bayancela, D.S. (2019). Patrones de cacería y consumo de proteína animal en cuatro comunidades Waorani, Reserva de Biósfera Yasuní. Cienc. Digit 3: 43–60. Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, C. (1981). El Shuar y el ambiente. conocimiento del medio y cacería no destructiva, 1st ed. Quito: Ediciones Abya-Yala. Search in Google Scholar

Blake, J.G., Mosquera, D., Guerra, J., and Romo, D. (2010). New locality records and the first photographs of living Echimys saturnus (Dark Tree Rat, Echimyidae) from eastern Ecuador. Ecotropica 16: 141–144. Search in Google Scholar

Boada, C.E. (2011). Mamíferos de los Tepuyes de la cuenca alta del río Nangaritza, cordillera del Cóndor. In: Guayasamín, J.M., and Bonaccorso, E. (Eds.), Evaluación Ecológica Rápida de la biodiversidad de los Tepuyes de la cuenca alta del río Nangaritza, cordillera del Cóndor, Ecuador. Boletín de Evaluación Ecológica Rápida 58. Conservación Internacional, Quito, pp. 76–86. Search in Google Scholar

Camacho, M.A., Tirira, D.G., Dick, C.W., and Burneo, S.F. (2014). Mammalia, Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae, Lophostoma carrikeri (J. A. Allen, 1910): first confirmed records in Ecuador. Check List 10: 217–220.https://doi.org/10.15560/10.1.217. Search in Google Scholar

Campos, F., and Tirira, D.G. (2011). Inventario de usos culturales, técnicas y saberes ancestrales de la fauna en dos comunidades indígenas Waorani de la provincia de Orellana. Technical report. Ministerio Coordinador de Patrimonio, Quito. Search in Google Scholar

Chao, A. (1984). Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 11: 256–270. Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa, S., Branch, C., and Cueva, R. (2014). Road development and the geography of hunting by an Amazonian indigenous group: consequences for wildlife conservation. PloS One 9: e114916.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114916. Search in Google Scholar

Finer, M., Vijay, V., Ponce, F., Jenkins, C.N., and Kahn, T.R. (2009). Ecuador’s Yasuní Biosphere Reserve: a brief modern history and conservation challenges. Environ. Res. Lett. 4: 034005.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/034005. Search in Google Scholar

Franzen, M. (2001). Las pautas de cacería de los Waorani: la reacción a la economía-mercado en la Amazonía del Ecuador. In: Jorgenson, J.P., and Coello, M. (Eds.), Conservación y desarrollo sostenible del Parque Nacional Yasuní y su área de influencia. SIMBIOE, Quito, pp. 128–136. Search in Google Scholar

Franzen, M. (2006). Evaluating the sustainability of hunting: a comparison of harvest profiles across three Waorani communities. Environ. Conserv. 33: 36–45.https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892906002712. Search in Google Scholar

Guerra, M.J., and Albuja, L. (2012). Registros adicionales de tres especies de murciélagos en el Yasuní, Amazonía ecuatoriana. Rev. Politécnica 30: 166–171. Search in Google Scholar

IUCN (2020). 2020 The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, version 2020.1, Available at: <http://www.iucnredlist.org> (Accessed 24 March 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Jones, G., Jacobs, D.J., Kunz, T.H., Willig, M.R., and Racey, P.A. (2009). Carpe noctem: the importance of bats as bioindicators. Endanger. Species Res. 8: 93–115.https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00182. Search in Google Scholar

Joshi, N.V., and Gadgil, M. (1991). On the role of refugia in promoting prudent use of biological resources. Theor. Popul. Biol. 40: 211–229.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(91)90053-i. Search in Google Scholar

Kalko, E.K.V., Handley, C.O.Jr., and Handley, D. (1996). Organization, diversity and long-term dynamics of a Neotropical bat community. In: Cody, M.L., and Smallwood, J.A. (Eds.), Long-term studies of vertebrate communities. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 503–553. Search in Google Scholar

Lim, B.K., Engstrom, M.D., Reid, F.A., Simmons, N.B., Voss, R.S., and Fleck, D.W. (2010). A new species of Peropteryx (Chiroptera: Emballonuridae) from Western Amazonia with comments on phylogenetic relationships within the genus. Am. Mus. Novit. 3686: 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1206/691.1. Search in Google Scholar

MAE. (2010). Reservas de biosfera del Ecuador: lugares excepcionales. GIZ, WCS. NCI and UNESCO, Quito. Search in Google Scholar

MAE. (2013). Sistema de clasificación de ecosistemas del Ecuador continental. Ministerio del Ambiente del Ecuador,Quito. p. 235. Search in Google Scholar

Magurran, A.E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Search in Google Scholar

McCullough, D.R. (1996). Spatially structured populations and harvest theory. J. Wildl. Manag. 60: 1–9.https://doi.org/10.2307/3802033. Search in Google Scholar

Mena-V, P. (1996). Etnozoología del volcán Sumaco. Rev. Geogr. 36: 121–173. Search in Google Scholar

Mena-V, P. (1997). Diversidad y abundancia relativa de los mamíferos en Sinangüé, Reserva Ecológica Cayambe-Coca, Sucumbíos, Ecuador. In: Mena, P.A., Soldi, A., Alarcón, R., Chiriboga, C., and Suárez, L. (Eds.), Estudios biológicos para la conservación. Diversidad, ecología y etnobiología. EcoCiencia, Quito, pp. 57–72. Search in Google Scholar

Mena-V, P., Regalado, J.B., and Cueva, R.L. (1997). Oferta de animales en el bosque y cacería en la comunidad huaorani de Quehueire’ono, zona de amortiguamiento del Parque Nacional Yasuní, Napo, Ecuador. In: Mena, P.A., Soldi, A., Alarcón, R., Chiriboga, C., and Suárez, L. (Eds.), Estudios biológicos para la conservación. Diversidad, ecología y etnobiología. EcoCiencia, Quito, pp. 395–426. Search in Google Scholar

Mena, V.P., Stallings, J.R., Regalado, J.B., and Cueva, R.L. (2000). The sustainability of current hunting practices by the Huaorani. In: Robinson, J.G., and Bennett, E.L. (Eds.), Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 57–78. Search in Google Scholar

Moreno, C.E. (2001). Métodos para medir la biodiversidad. Volume 1. M&T Manuales y Tesis SEA, Zaragoza, Spain. Search in Google Scholar

Morrone, J.J. (2001). Biogeografía de América Latina y el Caribe. M&T Manuales y Tesis SEA, Zaragoza, Spain. Search in Google Scholar

Novaro, A.J., Funes, M.C., and Walker, R.S. (2005). An empirical test of source-sink dynamics induced by hunting. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 910–920.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01067.x. Search in Google Scholar

Palacios, W., Cerón, C., Valencia, R., and Sierra, R. (1999). Las formaciones naturales de la Amazonía del Ecuador. In: Sierra, R. (Ed.), Propuesta preliminar para un sistema de clasificación de la vegetación para el Ecuador continental. Proyecto INEFAN/GEF-BIRF and EcoCiencia, Quito, pp. 109–119. Search in Google Scholar

Pitman, N., Moskovits, D.K., Alverson, W.S., and Borman, R.A. (2002). Ecuador: Serranías Cofán-Bermejo, Sinangoe. Rapid Biological Inventories Report 3. The Field Museum, Chicago, IL. Search in Google Scholar

Pitman, N.C.A. (2000). A large-scale inventory of two Amazonian tree communities, Ph.D. thesis. Durham, NC: Duke University. Search in Google Scholar

Pulliam, H.R. (1988). Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652–661.https://doi.org/10.1086/284880. Search in Google Scholar

Reid, F.A., Engstrom, M.D., and Lim, B.K. (2000). Noteworthy records of bats from Ecuador. Acta Chiropterol. 2: 37–51. Search in Google Scholar

Rex, K., Kelm, D.H., Wiesner, K., Kunz, T.H., and Voigt, C.C. (2008). Species richness and structure of three neotropical bat assemblages. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 94: 617–629.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01014.x. Search in Google Scholar

Rival, L. (2009). Towards an understanding of the Huaorani ways of knowing and naming plants. In: Alexiades, M.N. (Ed.), Mobility and migration in indigenous Amazonia: Contemporary ethnoecological perspectives. Studies in environmental anthropology and ethnobiology. Berghahn Books, New York and Oxford, UK, pp. 47–68. Search in Google Scholar

Romero-Saltos, H., Valencia, R., and Macía, M.J. (2001). Patrones de diversidad, distribución y rareza de plantas leñosas en el Parque Nacional Yasuní y la Reserva Étnica Waorani, Amazonía ecuatoriana. In: Duivenvoorden, J.F., Balslev, H., Cavelier, J., Grández, C., Tuomisto, H., and Valencia, R. (Eds.), Evaluación de recursos vegetales no maderables en la Amazonía noroccidental. IBED. Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 131–162. Search in Google Scholar

Sikes, R.S. and The Animal Care and Use Committee of the ASM (2016). 2016 Guidelines of the American society of mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research and education. J. Mammal. 97: 663–688.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw078. Search in Google Scholar

Soares-Filho, B.S., Nepstad, D.C., Curran, L.M., Cerqueira, G.C., Garcia, R.A., Ramos, C.A., Voll, E., McDonald, A., Lefebvre, P., and Schlesinger, P. (2006). Modeling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 440: 520–523.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04389. Search in Google Scholar

Suárez, L., and Mena, P.A. (1994). Manual de métodos para inventarios de vertebrados terrestres. EcoCiencia, Quito. Search in Google Scholar

Tardío, J., and Pardo-de-Santayana, M. (2008). Cultural Importance Indices: a comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ. Bot. 62: 24–39.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5. Search in Google Scholar

Tirira, D.G. (2011). Libro Rojo de los Mamíferos del Ecuador. Publicación especial sobre los mamíferos del Ecuador 8, 2nd ed. Quito: Fundación Mamíferos y Conservación, PUCE and MAE, p. 400. Search in Google Scholar

Tirira, D.G. (2012). Murciélagos del Ecuador: una referencia geográfica, taxonómica y bibliográfica. In: Tirira, D.G., and Burneo, S.F. (Eds.), Investigación y conservación sobre murciélagos en el Ecuador. Publicación especial sobre los mamíferos del Ecuador 9. PUCE. Fundación Mamíferos y Conservación and AEM, Quito, pp. 235–326. Search in Google Scholar

Tirira, D.G. (2017). A field guide to the mammals of Ecuador. 1st English edition. Publicación especial sobre los mamíferos del Ecuador 10. AEM and Editorial Murciélago Blanco, Quito. Search in Google Scholar

Tirira, D.G. (2019). Red Noctilio: Unpublished database on the mammals of Ecuador. Grupo Murciélago Blanco, Quito. Search in Google Scholar

Tirira, D.G., and de la Torre, S. (2018). Capuchino de cabeza grande Sapajus macrocephalus Spix, 1823. In: Tirira, D.G., de la Torre, S., and Zapata Ríos, G. (Eds.), Estado de conservación de los primates del Ecuador. GEPE and AEM, Quito, pp. 82–87. Search in Google Scholar

Tirira, D.G., and Rios, M. (2019). Monitoreo Biológico Yasuní. Uso de la flora y la fauna por el pueblo Waorani, Amazonía del Ecuador, 8. Ecuambiente Consulting Group, Quito. p. 312. Search in Google Scholar

Tirira, D.G., Reid, F.A., and Engstrom, M.D. (2019a). Monitoreo Biológico Yasuní. Mamíferos, 2. Ecuambiente Consulting Group. Quito. p. 284. Search in Google Scholar

Tirira, D.G., Brito, J., Burneo, S.F., Moreno, P.C., and Pinto, C.M. (2019b). Mammals of Ecuador: Updated checklist species. Version 2019.1. AEM, Quito, Available at: <http://aem.mamiferosdelecuador.com> updated: 2019-09-30. Search in Google Scholar

Toscano, G., and Burneo, S.F. (2012). Efecto de borde sobre murciélagos filostómidos en la Amazonía ecuatoriana. In: Tirira, D.G., and Burneo, S.F. (Eds.), Investigación y conservación sobre murciélagos en el Ecuador. Publicación especial sobre los mamíferos del Ecuador 9. PUCE. Fundación Mamíferos y Conservación and AEM, Quito, pp. 47–60. Search in Google Scholar

WCS. (2007). El tráfico de carne silvestre en el Parque Nacional Yasuní: caracterización de un mercado creciente en la Amazonía norte del Ecuador. WCS Ecuador 2: 1–8. Search in Google Scholar

Williams, S.L., and Genoways, H.H. (2008). Subfamily Phyllostominae. In: Gardner, A.L. (Ed.), Mammals of South America, Volume 1 marsupials, xenarthrans, shrews, and bats. Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 255–300. Search in Google Scholar

Yost, J.A. (1981). Twenty years of contact: the mechanisms of change in Wao (“Auca”) culture. In: WhittenJr.N.E. (Ed.), Cultural transformations and ethnicity in modern Ecuador. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, pp. 677–704. Search in Google Scholar

Zapata Ríos, G. (2001). Sustentabilidad de la cacería de subsistencia: el caso de cuatro comunidades quichuas en la Amazonía nororiental ecuatoriana. Mastozool. Neotrop. 8: 59–66. Search in Google Scholar

Zapata Ríos, G., Araguillin, E., and Jorgenson, J.P. (2006). Caracterización de la comunidad de mamíferos no voladores en las estribaciones orientales de la cordillera del Kutukú, Amazonía ecuatoriana. Mastozool. Neotrop. 13: 227–238. Search in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2019-0144.

Received: 2019-11-27
Accepted: 2020-05-26
Published Online: 2020-08-10
Published in Print: 2020-11-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston