Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter May 23, 2022

Long-distance dispersal of two species of shrews (Sorex caecutiens Laxmann, 1788 and Sorex minutus Linnaeus, 1766)

Svetlana Mukhacheva ORCID logo and Oleg Tolkachev ORCID logo
From the journal Mammalia

Abstract

Data on the dispersal of shrews are still rare, and for some species of Soricidae these are not available at all. Group marking with bait containing rhodamine B was used to study the dispersal of two species of shrews – Laxmann’s shrew (Sorex caecutiens) and pygmy shrew (Sorex minutus) in the Middle Urals (Russia). Twelve Laxmann’s shrews moved straight-line distances ranging from 80 to 4500 m. Five pygmy shrews dispersed from 475 to 2570 m. The are first field data obtained on dispersal distances of the pygmy shrew. The reported dispersal distances of the Laxmann`s shrew are the maximum known for this species.


Corresponding author: Svetlana Mukhacheva, Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg 620144, Russia, E-mail:

Funding source: Russian Foundation for Basic Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002261

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20-04-00164a

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to E.A. Belskaya and M.P. Zolotarev, who provided shrews from Barber pitfall traps, and to Yu.L. Sumorokov, E.Yu. Sumorokova, and S.Yu. Sumorokov for their help with the field studies, and we thanks the reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This study was performed within the framework of a state contract with the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (themes 122021000082-0, 122021000076-9), and partly supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant no. 20-04-00164a).

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

  4. Research ethics: All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The Bioethics Commission of the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch, RAS, approved the study (No: 6 May 18, 2021).

References

Bol’shakov, V.N. and Bazhenov, A.V. (1988). Radionuklidnye metody mecheniya v populyatsionnoi ekologii mlekopitayushcikh (Radionuclide methods of marking in population ecology of mammals). Moscow: Nauka, [in Russian].Search in Google Scholar

Bowler, D.E. and Benton, T.G. (2005). Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behavior to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 80: 205–225.10.1017/S1464793104006645Search in Google Scholar

Clark, B.K., Kaufman, D.W., Kaufman, G.A., Finck, E.J., and Hand, S.S. (1988). Long-distance movements by Reithrodontomys megalotis in tallgrass prairie. Am. Midl. Nat. 120: 276–281.10.2307/2425999Search in Google Scholar

Clobert, J., Baguette, M., Benton, T., Bullock, J., and Ducatez, S. (2012). Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cooney, S.A., Schauber, E.M., and Hellgren, E.C. (2015). Comparing permeability of matrix cover types for the marsh rice rat (Oryzomys palustris). Landsc. Ecol. 30: 1307–1320, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0185-5.Search in Google Scholar

Dickman, C.R., Predavec, M., and Downey, F.J. (1995). Long-range movements of small mammals in arid Australia: implications for land management. J. Arid Environ. 31: 441–452.10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80127-2Search in Google Scholar

Faust, B.F., Smith, M.H., and Wray, W.B. (1971). Distances moved by small mammals as an apparent function of grid size. Acta Theriol. 16: 161–177.10.4098/AT.arch.71-11Search in Google Scholar

Fisher, P. (1999). Review of using Rhodamine B as a marker for wildlife studies. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 27: 318–329.Search in Google Scholar

Grigorkina, E.B. and Olenev, G.V. (2018). Migrations of rodents in the zone of local radioactive contamination at different phases of population dynamics and their consequences. Biol. Bull. 45: 110–118.10.1134/S1062359018010041Search in Google Scholar

Jung, T.S., O’Donovan, K.S., and Powell, T. (2005). Long-distance movement of a dispersing deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus, in the boreal forest. Can. Field Nat. 119: 451–452.10.22621/cfn.v119i3.161Search in Google Scholar

Lavoie, G.K., Atwell, G.C., Swink, F.N., Sumangil, J.P., and Libay, J. (1971). Movement of the ricefield rat, Rattus rattus mundaneness, in response to flooding and plowing as shown by fluorescent bone labeling. Philipp. Agric. 54: 325–330.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, T.J. (2002). Long-distance movements by female White-footed Mice, Peromyscus leucopus, in an extensive mixed-wood forest. Can. Field Nat. 116: 108–111.Search in Google Scholar

Michielsen, N.C. (1966). Intraspecific and interspecific competition in the shrews Sorex araneus L. and S. minutus L. Arch. Neerl. Zool. 17: 73–174.10.1163/036551666X00084Search in Google Scholar

Mohr, K., Leirs, H., Katakweba, A., and Machang’u, R. (2007). Monitoring rodents’ movements with a biomarker around introduction and feeding foci in an urban environment in Tanzania. Afr. Zool. 42: 294–298.10.3377/1562-7020(2007)42[294:MRMWAB]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Mukhacheva, S.V. (2021). Long-term dynamics of small mammal communities in the period of reduction of copper smelter emissions: I. Composition, abundance, and diversity. Russ. J. Ecol. 52: 84–93, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413621010100.Search in Google Scholar

Mukhacheva, S.V. and Sozontov, A.N. (2021). Long-term dynamics of small mammal communities in the period of reduction of copper smelter emissions: II. β-diversity. Russ. J. Ecol. 52: 532–541, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413621060084.Search in Google Scholar

Nathan, R. (2001). The challenges of studying dispersal. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 481–483.10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02272-8Search in Google Scholar

Shchipanov, N.A. (2007). Understanding the boundaries between chromosome races of common shrews in terms of restricted movement by individual shrews. Russian. J. Theriol. 6: 117–122.Search in Google Scholar

Shchipanov, N.A. and Pavlova, S.V. (2016). Evolutionary and taxonomic differentiation of shrew species in the “Araneus” group of the genus Sorex: 2. Subdivision within the common shrew. Biol. Bull. 43: 1087–1098, https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359016090168.Search in Google Scholar

Shchipanov, N.A., Kalinin, A.A., Oleinichenko, V.Yu., Demidova, T.B., and Gontcharova, O.B. (2001). Using of space by the shrew Sorex caecutiens (Insectivora, Mammalia). Home ranges and long-distance movements. Zool. Zh. 80: 584–585.Search in Google Scholar

Stenseth, N.C. and Lidicker, W.Z.Jr. (1992). Animal dispersal. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-94-011-2338-9Search in Google Scholar

Sutherland, G.D., Harestad, A.S., Price, K., and Lertzman, K.P. (2000). Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv. Ecol. 4: 16, [online] <http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss1/art16>.10.5751/ES-00184-040116Search in Google Scholar

Szacki, J. and Liro, A. (1991). Movements of small mammals in the heterogeneous landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 5: 219–224.10.1007/BF00141436Search in Google Scholar

Tegelström, H. and Hansson, L. (1987). Evidence of long distance dispersal in the Common shrew (Sorex araneus). Z. Säugetierkunde 52: 54–55.Search in Google Scholar

Tennekes, M. (2018). tmap: thematic maps in R. J. Stat. Software 84: 1–39, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v084.i06.Search in Google Scholar

Tolkachev, O.V. (2016). A study on the migrations of murine rodents in urban environments. Russ. J. Ecol. 47: 399–404, https://doi.org/10.1134/S10674413616040147.Search in Google Scholar

Tolkachev, O.V. (2019a). A new baiting scheme and simple method of rhodamine B detection could improve the biomarking of small mammals. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 65: 10, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10344-018-1243-5.Search in Google Scholar

Tolkachev, O.V. (2019b). The etymology of some names of traps as applied in the studies of small mammals. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Biologiya = Tomsk State Univ. J. Biol. 48: 73–96, https://doi.org/10.17223/19988591/47/4.Search in Google Scholar

Tolkachev, O.V. and Bespamyatnykh, E.N. (2019). The new method of rhodamine mark detection and its application possibilities in zoological studies. J. Sib. Fed. Univ. Biol. 12: 352–365, https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1389-0051.Search in Google Scholar

Weerakoon, M.K., Price, C.J., and Banks, P.B. (2013). Hair type, intake, and detection method influence Rhodamine B detectability. J. Wildl. Manag. 77: 306–312.10.1002/jwmg.459Search in Google Scholar

Zaitsev, М.V., Voyta, L.L., and Sheftel, B.I. (2014). The mammals of Russia and adjacent territories. In: Lipotyphlans. Saint Petersburg: Nauka. [in Russian].Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-12-01
Accepted: 2022-03-09
Published Online: 2022-05-23

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston