Let Ai ∈ B(H), (i = 1, 2, ..., n), and . In this paper, we present some upper bounds and lower bounds for w(T). At the end of this paper we drive a new bound for the zeros of polynomials.
Let B(H) be the C*– algebra of all bounded linear operators on a complex Hilbert space H with inner product 〈.,.〉. The numerical range of T ∈ B(H); denoted by W(T), is the subset of complex numbers given by
The numerical radius of T, denoted by w(T), is given by
It is well-known that w(.) defines a norm on B(H), which is equivalent to the usual operator norm . In fact for T ∈ B(H), we have
Several numerical radius inequalities that provide alternative lower and upper bounds for w(.) have received much attention from many authors. We refer the readers to [1, 2] for the history and significance, and [3–7] for recent developments this area. Kittaneh  proved that for T ∈ B(H).
So it is clear that if T2 = 0; then
Also it is known that w(.) is weakly unitarily invariant, that is
A fundamental inequality for the numerical radius is the power inequality, which says that for T ∈ B(H), we have
Although some open problems related to the numerical radius inequalities for bound linear operators still remain open, the investigation to establish numerical radius inequalities for several bound linear operators has been started. For example, if T1, T2 ∈ B(H), it is known  that
Moreover, in the case that T1, T2 = T2T1,
However, the sharp inequality
If T1, T2 ∈ B(H), and T1 is positive operator, Kittaneh in  showed that
Recently, the authors of  applied a different approach to obtain a new numerical radius inequality for commutators of Hilbert space operators. They showed that for T1, T2, T3, T4 ∈ B(H),
The following numerical radius inequality for certain 2 × 2 operator matrices is obtained in ,
The purpose of this work is to present new numerical radius inequalities for n × n operator matrices. Also we deduce (3) and (4) as special cases. At the end of this paper, we give some new bounds for the zeros of any monic polynomial with complex coefficients.
The aim of this section is to establish new numerical radius inequalities for matrices of operators and to generalize some known inequalities. In order to do this, we need the following well-known lemma.
(). LetX1, X2, ..., Xn ∈ B(H). Then
Let us use this lemma to generalize the inequality (4).
Let Ai ∈ B(H), i = 1, 2,..., n and
Then if n is even,
Then if n is an even number we have for all i = 1, 2,..., n and so
On the other hand, if n is an odd number, then following the same manner used above we achieve that
Let Ai ∈ B(H), (i = 1, 2, ..., n) where n ≥ 3 and 1, α, α2,..., αn − 1are the roots of unity and . Then
Then it is easy to show that U1, U2 and U3 are unitary operators so by (2) we have , which completes the proof. □
As a direct consequence of Theorem 2.3 we obtain the following corollary
LetX1, X2, X3 ∈ B(H) and 1; α, α2be the roots of x3 = 1. Then
For , we have
Another relation for the numerical radius of the operator is as follows.
LetXi ∈ B(H), (i = 1, 2, ..., n) where n ≥ 3, and Then
An application of Theorem 2.5 yields
LetX1, X2, X3 ∈ B(H). Then
Using a straightforward technique we derive the following lemma.
LetAi, Xi ∈ B(H), i = 1, 2, ..., n. Then
Assume that x ∈ H is a unit vector. Then
We attain our theorem by taking the supremum over all unit vectors x ∈ H.
Our next result can be stated as follows.
Let Ai, Bi, Xi, Yi ∈ B(H), i = 1, 2, ..., n. Then
Assume that and
Now, if we replace Ai and Bi by t Ai and , t > 0, respectively, then we have
Also, since so we have
Finally, replace Yi by −Yi to get
As an application of Theorem 2.8, we obtain the following result.
IfTi ∈ B(H), i = 1, 2,..., n, then
LetXi = Yi = Ti and Ai = Bi = I. □
LetAij ∈ B(H) where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n. Then
For 1 ≤ x, y ≤ n where x ≠ y. Define the operator matrix Txy = [tij] where
LetA, B, C, D = ∈ B(H). Then
Let p(z) = zn + anzn-1 + ... + a2z + a1 be a monic polynomial of degree n ≥ 3 with complex coefficients a1, a2, ..., an. Then the Frobenius companion matrix of p is the matrix
It is well-known that the zero of p are exactly the eigenvalues of C(p) (see, e.g., [13, 14]). Since the spectral radius of a matrix is dominated by its numerical radius, it follows that if z is any zero of p, then
If z is any zero ofp(z), then
Partition C(p) as
Then we have
It should be mentioned here that other bounds for the zeros of p(z) can be obtained by considering different partitions of C(p). Related bounds for the zeros of p that are based on the inequality (5) and various estimates of w(C(p)) can be found in [13, 14], and references therein.
1 Bhatia R., Matrix Analysis, Berlin. Springer-Verlage, 1997.2 Search in Google Scholar
2 Dragomir S., A survey of some recent inequalities for the norm and numerical radius of operators in Hilbert spaces, Banach J. Math. Anal., 2007, 2(1), 154– 175. Search in Google Scholar
3 Dragomir S., Inequalities for the norm and the numerical radius of linear operator in Hilbert spaces, Demonstatio Math., 2007, 2(40), 411– 417. Search in Google Scholar
4 Dragomir S., Norm and numerical radius inequalities for sums of bounded linear operators in Hilbert spaces, Ser. Math. Inform., 2007, 1(22), 61– 75. General numerical radius inequalities for matrices of operators 117 Search in Google Scholar
5 Kittaneh F., A numerical radius inequality and an estimate for the numerical radius of the Frobenius companion matrix, Studia Math., 2003, 158(1), 11– 17. Search in Google Scholar
6 Omidvar E., Moslehian M., Niknam A., Some numerical radius inequalities for Hilbert space operators. Involve, a journal of mathematics, 2009, 4(2), 471– 478. Search in Google Scholar
7 Kittaneh F., Numerical radius inequalities for Hillbert space operators, Studia Math., 2005, 168(1), 73– 80. Search in Google Scholar
8 Fong C., Holbrook J., Unitarily invariant operator norms, Can. J. Math., 1983, 135, 274– 299. Search in Google Scholar
9 Kittaneh F., Notes on some inequalities for Hilbert space operators, Pub1. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., 1988, 24, 283– 293. Search in Google Scholar
10 Hirzallah O., Kittaneh F., Shebrawi K., Numerical radius inequalities for commutators of Hilbert space operators, Num. Func. Anal. and Opti., 2011, 7(32), 739– 749. Search in Google Scholar
11 Hirzallah O., Kittaneh F., Shebrawi K., Numerical radius inequalities for certian 2 × 2 operator matrices, Integr. Equ. Oper. Theory, 2011, 71, 129– 147. Search in Google Scholar
12 Kittaneh F., Moslehian M. Takeaki Y., decommpostion and numerical radius inequalities. Linear Algebra 2015, 471, 46-53. Search in Google Scholar
13 Horn R., Johnson C., Matrix Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1985. Search in Google Scholar
14 Amer A.,Kittaneh F., Estimates for the numerical radius and the spectral radius of the Frobenius companion matrix and bound for the zeros of polynomials. Ann. funct. Anal. 5 2014, 1, 56-62. Search in Google Scholar
© 2016 Al-Dolat et al., published by De Gruyter Open.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.