Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 7, 2014

The Marginalisation of Finely Tuned Semiotic Practices and Misunderstandings in Relation to (Signed) Languages and Deafness

  • Elina Tapio

    Elina Tapio is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Jyväskylä, the Department of Languages, the Sign Language Centre. She is teaching curriculum courses and doing ethnographic research on signed interaction with a particular interest on space, multimodality, and multilingualism.

    EMAIL logo
From the journal Multimodal Communication

Abstract

When people draw on the available modal resources (e.g. gestures) in specific contexts over time, those resources come to display regularities. The more a community uses and regulates those resources, the more fully and finely articulated their regularities and patterns become. Modes, organised by regular means of representation, are constantly transformed by users, depending on what the community needs. This paper discusses the way semiotic resources and practices, i.e. social actions with a history, used by sign language signers in visually oriented communities, as well as the research in such domains, have been marginalised. The paper reflects some of the main reasons for such marginalisation and argues how marginalisation is a result of some crucial misunderstandings in relation to (signed) languages, language learning, deafness, and disability. Research into human interaction, in general, has taken a multimodal turn. This paper suggests, through practical examples, how multimodally oriented research could enrich its view by recognising communication-practices inside visually oriented domains, as well as research in the area, instead of considering D/deaf and sign language related research as a specialised area of research.

About the author

Elina Tapio

Elina Tapio is a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Jyväskylä, the Department of Languages, the Sign Language Centre. She is teaching curriculum courses and doing ethnographic research on signed interaction with a particular interest on space, multimodality, and multilingualism.

Acknowledgements

This paper builds on the findings of my PhD research A nexus analysis of English in the everyday life of FinSL signers – a multimodal view on interaction (Tapio 2013). The project was affiliated with both the University of Oulu, Faculty of Humanities as part of the Multimodal action and interaction in networked learning and work (MAILL) research project, and the University of Jyväskylä, Department of Languages, Sign Language Centre. Supports from various institutions are acknowledged in Tapio (2013). I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the previous version of this article and the Multimodal Research Centre for providing an inspirational environment for writing.

References

Agar, M. (1995). Ethnography. In: Handbook of Pragmatics, J.Verschueren, J.Östman, and J.Blommaert (Eds.), 583590. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/hop.m.eth3Search in Google Scholar

Bagga-Gupta, S. (1999). Visual language environments. Exploring everyday life and literacies in Swedish Deaf bilingual schools. Visual Anthropology Review, 15(2):95120.Search in Google Scholar

Bagga-Gupta, S. (2004). Visually oriented language use: discursive and technological resources in Swedish deaf pedagogical arenas. In: To the Lexicon and Beyond: Sociolinguistics in European Deaf Communities, M. V.Herreweghe and M.Vermeerbergen (Eds.), 171207. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bagga-Gupta, S. (2007). Aspects of diversity, inclusion and democracy within education and research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51(1):122.Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, H. L. (2008a). Introduction: listening to deaf studies. In: Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking, H. L.Bauman (Ed.), 132. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bauman, H. L. (Ed.). (2008b). Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, J., and Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. www.unesco.org/shs/diversities/vol13/issue2/art1edn.UNESCOSearch in Google Scholar

Corballis, M. C. (2002). From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691221731Search in Google Scholar

Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, L. J. (2008). Postdeafness. In: Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking, H. L.Bauman (Ed.), 314325. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dufva, H. (2010). Reclaiming the mind. Dialogism, language learning and the importance of considering cognition. In: Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on Perspectives and Limits of Dialogism, M.Bakhtin, K.Junefelt, and P.Nordin (Eds.), 4148. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Search in Google Scholar

Dufva, H. (2013). Language learning as dialogue and participation. In: Problem-Based Learning for the 21st Century, E.Christiansen, L.Kuure, A.Mørch and B.Lindström (Eds.), 5172. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Firth, A. and Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3):285300.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal. New York: Picador.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10):14891522.Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., and Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture and Activity, 6(4):286303.Search in Google Scholar

Gynne, A., and Bagga-Gupta, S. (2013). Young people’s languaging and social positioning. Chaining in “bilingual” educational settings in Sweden. Linguistics and Education, 24(4):479496.Search in Google Scholar

Haualand, H. (2008). Sound and belonging: what is a community? In: Open Your Eyes: Deaf Studies Talking, H. L.Bauman (Ed.), 111123. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Heller, M. (2008). Doing ethnography. In: Guide to Research Methods in Bilingualism and Multilingualism, W.Li and M.Moyer (Eds.), 249262. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444301120.ch14Search in Google Scholar

Humphries, T. and MacDougall, F. (1999). “Chaining” and other links: Making connections between American Sign Language and English in two types of school settings. Visual Anthropology Review, 15(2):8494.Search in Google Scholar

Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1):2957.Search in Google Scholar

Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1):241267.Search in Google Scholar

Jewitt, C. (2009). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodality and digital technologies in the classroom. In: Multilingualism and Multimodality. Current Challenges for Educational Studies, I.De Saint-Georges and J.Weber (Eds.), 141152. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.10.1007/978-94-6209-266-2_8Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. E. (2006). Cultural constructs that impede discussion about variability in speech-based educational models for deaf children with cochlear implants. Perspectiva, 24:2980.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. E., and Liddell, S. K. (2011). Toward a phonetic representation of hand configuration: the fingers. Sign Language Studies, 12(1):545.Search in Google Scholar

Jokinen, M. (2001). “The sign language person” – A term to describe us and our future more clearly? In: Looking Forward: EUD in the 3rd Millennium – The Deaf Citizen in the 21st Century, L.Leeson (Ed.), 5063. Coleford: Maclean.Search in Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (2002a). Introduction: “How can we tell the dancer from the dance?” In: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives, C.Kramsch (Ed.), 130. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (2002b). Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Kravchenko, A. V. (2009). The experiential basis of speech and writing as different cognitive domains. Pragmatics and Cognition, 17(3):527548.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, G., and Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuure, L., and McCambridge, E. (2007). Networks and place – A study of online activities in two focus groups. In: Kieli Oppimisessa – Language in Learning. AFinLA Yearbook, O.Salo and T.Nikula (Eds.), 137155. Publications de l’association finlandaise de linguistique appliquée (AFinLA) 65.Search in Google Scholar

Ladd, P. (2003). Understanding Deaf Culture: in Search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.10.21832/9781853595479Search in Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lemke, J. L. (2002). Language development and identity: multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning. In: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives, C. J.Kramsch (Ed.), 6887. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Liddell, S. K., and Johnson, R. E. (1989). American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies, 64:195277.Search in Google Scholar

Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615054Search in Google Scholar

McIlvenny, P. (1995). Seeing conversations: analysing sign language talk. In: Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organisation of Talk and Embodied Activities, P. TenHave and G.Psathas (Eds.). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (2012). How Language Began: Gesture and Speech in Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139108669Search in Google Scholar

Niederberger, N. (2008). Does the knowledge of a natural sign language facilitate deaf children’s learning to read and write? Insights from French Sign Language and written French data. In: Sign Bilingualism: Language Development, Interaction, and Maintenance in Sign Language Contact Situations, C.Plaza Pust and E.Morales Lo´pez (Eds.), 2950. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.38.05nieSearch in Google Scholar

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Taylor & Francis Group.10.4324/9780203379493Search in Google Scholar

Padden, C. A., and Gunsauls, D. C. (2003). How the alphabet came to be used in a sign language. Sign Language Studies, 4(1):1033.Search in Google Scholar

Padden, C., and Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture. London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Padden, C. and Ramsey, C. (2000). American sign language and reading ability in deaf children. In: Language Acquisition by Eye, C.Chamberlain, J. P.Morford, and R. I.Mayberrry (Eds.), 165189. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Patrie, C. J., and Johnson, R. E. (2011). Fingerspelled Word Recognition Through Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. San Diego, CA: DawnSignPress.Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and Transcultural Flows. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Rainò, P. (2001). Mouthings and mouth gestures in Finnish sign language (FinSL). In: The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth, P.Boyes-Braem and R.Sutton-Spence (Eds.), 4149. Hamburg: Signum-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Rainò, P. and Seilola, I. (2008). Matemaattisen diskurssin kielioppia suomalaisessa viittomakielessä. In: Viittomakielisen luokanopettajakoulutuksen 10-vuotisjuhlakirja. Tutkiva Opettaja, Journal of Teacher Researcher, 6:5965.Search in Google Scholar

Salmi, E. (2010). Linguistic Turns in Teaching of the Deaf in Finland. Helsinki: HUMAK University of Applied Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. (1998). Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction: A Study of News Discourse. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. (2008). Discourse itineraries: nine processes of resemiotization. In: Advances in Discourse Studies, V. K.Bhatia, J.Flowerdew, and R. H.Jones (Eds.), 233244. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus Analysis – Discourse and the Emerging Internet. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203694343Search in Google Scholar

Takkinen, R. (2008). Kuvailevat verbit suomalaisessa viittomakielessä. Puhe ja kieli, 28(1):1740.Search in Google Scholar

Tapio, E. (2013). A Nexus Analysis of English in the Everyday Life of FinSL Signers – A Multimodal View on Interaction. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House.Search in Google Scholar

Tapio, E. (2014). Changing discourses and practices through participatory research “nexus analysis”. In: A paper presented in AILA World Congress 2014, Brisbane, Australia, 10–15 August, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Tapio, E., and Takkinen, R. (2012). When one of your languages is not recognized as a language at all. In: Dangerous Multilingualism – Northern Perspectives on Order, Purity and Normality, J.Blommaert, S.Leppänen, P.Pahta, and T.Virkkula (Eds.), 284308. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Search in Google Scholar

Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In: Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, J. P.Lantolf (Ed.), 245259. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. London: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/1-4020-7912-5Search in Google Scholar

Wertch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the Mind. A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, S. (1992). The Phonetics of Fingerspelling. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sspcl.4Search in Google Scholar

Zheng, D., and Newgarden, K. (2012). Rethinking language learning: Virtual worlds as a catalyst for change. International Journal of Learning and Media, 3(2):1336.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-11-7
Published in Print: 2014-11-1

©2014 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 3.10.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mc-2014-0010/html
Scroll to top button