Abstract.
Accuracy and precision of parallel Monte Carlo (MC) simulations may be impaired by the presence of intra-thread and inter-thread correlations depending on the parallel pseudo-random number generators (PPRNGs) used. While necessary, statistical tests alone are insufficient to ensure the absence of these correlations that can manifest as bias and variance to a extent in different applications. Therefore, application-based tests designed to mimic real-life MC scenarios may uncover them in the intended applications. The results of an application-based test simulating the Heston stochastic volatility model, a widely used pricing framework, is reported in order to compare the accuracy and precision profiles among four popular libraries of scalable pseudo-random number generators implementing sequence division (trng and RngSteam), parameterization (sprng) and counter-based (Random123) strategies. All pseudo-random number generators assessed demonstrate similar standard-error of mean profiles. However, the bias profiles are more varied albeit comparable. PPRNGs demonstrating the smallest bias profiles in absolute and relative terms are yarn4 from TRNG, mlfg from SPRNG, as well as Threefry2x64 from Random123 for truncated Euler scheme, and mrg5s from TRNG and lfg from SPRNG for the quadratic exponent scheme. It is recommended that, when selecting a PPRNG for parallel MC simulation from a set of competing PPRNGs with comparable bias and standard error of mean profiles in absolute terms, the PPRNG associated with the smallest parallel-sequential bias difference should be used as it reflects the smallest intra-thread correlation introduced by parallelization.
© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston