Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 1, 2022

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and delayed onset muscle soreness in light of the impaired blink and stretch reflexes – watch out for Piezo2

  • Balázs Sonkodi EMAIL logo and Tibor Hortobágyi
From the journal Open Medicine

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, multisystem neurodegenerative disease that causes the death of motoneurons (MNs) progressively and eventually leads to paralysis. In contrast, delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) is defined as delayed onset soreness, muscle stiffness, loss of force-generating capacity, reduced joint range of motion, and decreased proprioceptive function. Sensory deficits and impaired proprioception are common symptoms of both ALS and DOMS, as impairment at the proprioceptive sensory terminals in the muscle spindle is theorized to occur in both. The important clinical distinction is that extraocular muscles (EOM) are relatively spared in ALS, in contrast to limb skeletal muscles; however, the blink reflex goes through a gradual impairment in a later stage of disease progression. Noteworthy is, that, the stretch of EOM induces the blink reflex. The current authors suggest that the impairment of proprioceptive sensory nerve terminals in the EOM muscle spindles are partially responsible for lower blink reflex, beyond central origin, and implies the critical role of Piezo2 ion channels and Wnt-PIP2 signaling in this pathomechanism. The proposed microinjury of Piezo2 on muscle spindle proprioceptive terminals could provide an explanation for the painless dying-back noncontact injury mechanism theory of ALS.

1 Introduction

Charcot, a French neurologist, wrote about amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) first in the 19th century [1]. ALS is a fatal, multisystem neurodegenerative disease that causes the death of motoneurons (MNs) progressively [2,3]. On the other hand, Theodor Hough described delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) in 1902, ascribing the cause of muscle rupture [4]. However, the exact pathomechanism is far from known in ALS and the case is not different in DOMS either. DOMS is defined as delayed onset soreness, muscle stiffness, loss of force-generating capacity, reduced joint range of motion and decreased proprioceptive function [5]. The current authors emphasize the sensory deficits and impaired proprioception as common symptoms of both DOMS [5,6,7] and ALS [8,9,10]. Nevertheless, this was not the case for a long time when clinicians, for example, did not consider sensory neuronal and eye involvement as part of the features of ALS, and generally, it was considered as a pain-free lethal disease [10,11]. Emerging research studies have started to highlight the importance of sensory circuit dysfunction in ALS [10,12,13,14]. Correspondingly, both ALS and DOMS are suggested to be associated with impairment at the proprioceptive sensory terminals in the muscle spindles [7,10,15]. Furthermore, the recent ALS dying-back injury mechanism theory put forward the muscle spindle-derived sensory degeneration that induces the nonresolving progressive impairment of the proprioceptive circuitry [10].

The important clinical distinction is that extraocular muscles (EOM) are spared from progressive degeneration in ALS, in contrast to limb skeletal muscles [1,16,17,18]. The question has been on the agenda, why? Furthermore, the stretch of EOM is suggested to induce blink reflex [19]. However, the blink reflex goes through impairment in the later stage of ALS, regardless of relatively spared EOM. Moreover, a new DOMS hypothesis implies that the primary cause of this noncontact injury is a transient mechano-energetic impairment of the Piezo2 ion channel on the proprioceptive terminal of the muscle spindles, leading to a significant delay in the medium latency response of the stretch reflex (MLR) [10,15]. The question that arises is whether there is a mechanistic link between the aforementioned and with the delayed latency of R 2 , R2 and R1 components of the blink reflex? By answering these questions, we could possibly reveal further the difference in this distinct preservation phenomenon and could provide additional clues in reference to the degeneration mechanism of ALS.

2 Blink reflex, extraocular muscle spindle, and proprioception

Blink is a burst bilateral eyelid closure associated with concomitant eye movements. It provides a protective barrier for the eyes and facilitates the distribution of the tear film on the corneal surface. Accordingly, harsher tapping of the eyes elicits a bilateral blink reflex with the features of a nociceptive reflex [19]. Blink reflex is an oligosynaptic reflex comprising three neurons and transduced by the trigeminal and facial nerves [11]. The short-latency blink reflex is induced by the stretching of EOM and elicited in the EOM muscle spindles [19]. Muscle spindles contribute to the stretch reflex, and electromyographic studies clearly demonstrated stretch reflex responses in EOM of humans [20,21,22,23].

There are six EOM controlling eye muscles. The motor units of EOM are distinguished from other muscles because they have a special set of myosin heavy chains and they also have multiple neuromuscular innervation sites per single myofiber [24]. An interesting hallmark of ALS is that EOM enjoy a relative resistance to this lethal disease even until the later stage of progression, in contrast to skeletal muscles of extremities [1,16,17,18].

Our knowledge about the MNs of EOM is fairly well-founded, in contrast to our knowledge pertaining to the sensory innervation of EOM [25]. Muscle spindles and myotendinous cylinders (palisade endings) are the two types of sensory receptors located in EOM [25]. Noteworthy is, that, the structure of EOM muscle spindles differs from the ones found in skeletal muscles [25,26]. Since the density of EOM muscles spindles is comparable to the one found in hand and neck muscles, it leads to the suggestion that they have a role in fine motor control and possibly in proprioception [25]. Excitation of the EOM afferents could be detected in higher brain regions [25].

3 Microinjury of the Piezo2 ion channel in proprioceptive terminals

A recent hypothesis in reference to the cause of DOMS concludes that the primary injury of this dichotomous noncontact injury is a transient microdamage of the Piezo2 ion channel at the proprioceptive terminal in the muscle spindle [7,15]. Piezo proteins are enormous channels in size and with several transmembrane segments [27]. Yet, our knowledge pertaining to their topology, pore formation, mechanical force detection, and gating mechanism is substantially limited [27]. Noteworthy is, that, Piezo2 was found to be the principal transduction channel for proprioception [28]. Important underlying factors that could lead to the proposed acute Piezo2 channelopathy in DOMS are repetitive lengthening contractions leading to proprioceptive hyperexcitation, fatigue, and eventually, cognitive demand induced acute stress reaction (ASR) [7,15]. Note that these factors are implicated in the dying-back noncontact injury mechanism of ALS as well [10].

The suggested transient Piezo2 channelopathy mechanism in DOMS is as follows. The peripheral ending of proprioceptive nerves in the muscle spindle is theorized to be exposed to a terminal arbor degeneration (TAD)-like lesion [7], as could be observed as a side effect of platinum-analogue chemotherapy [29]. Bennett et al. wrote about TAD as, “if the energy deficiency is severe enough then degeneration happens, and the threshold for degeneration will be lowest in the neuronal compartment that has the highest energy requirement” [29] and that could be the axon terminals of hyperexcited proprioceptive nerves [7,10]. Accordingly, the peripheral endings of the proprioceptive sensory neurons in the muscle spindle are densely populated with mitochondria [30]. Cognitive demand-derived ASR induces mitochondrial energy depletion on top of unaccustomed or strenuous repetitive eccentric contractions, meaning hyperexcited proprioceptive fibers could guide the way toward a TAD-like lesion. In due course, it turns into a pathological process and that is the microinjury of the Piezo2 ion channel. Note that the hyperexcitation-related inactivation of Piezo2 ion channels is a physiological mechanism, and therefore, it is considered to be within homeostasis [31,32]. However, the proposed microinjury is beyond this point. Correspondingly, the stress-related microinjury of Piezo2 ion channels could be translated as breaching the homeostatic limits of an overreaching response. Indeed, stress-derived modified kinetics of Piezo exists in pathology [32]. The result of this transient channelopathy is that pathological changes could occur on the other central endings of the pseudounipolar primary afferents as well [33]. The gate controllers of these pathological changes are suggested to be the activated NMDARs [10]. Correspondingly, Bewick et al. put forward earlier that glutamate was released from synaptic-like vesicles in the proprioceptive terminals of the muscle spindles in a stretch-modulated manner [34]. However, Than et al. confirmed recently that glutamate release is in fact vesicular [31,35]. Sonkodi et al. further theorized that stress-induced mitochondrial energy deficiency could impair glutamate vesicular release and that could lead the way to glutamate spillover at the primary afferent terminals [15]. In addition, they hypothesized that mechano-energetically impaired Piezo2 channels could become permeable to Piezo currents and even to glutamate when they should not [15]. Finally, glutamate excitotoxicity could activate NMDARs at presynaptic central terminals at the spinal dorsal horn with potential long-term consequences [10,15]. This microinjury mechanism could provide the base for the acute noncontact injury mechanism of DOMS and degenerating dying-back noncontact injury mechanism of ALS [7,10].

Furthermore, this stress-related Piezo2 microinjury at the proprioceptive terminals is suggested to compromise the static encoding of the stretch reflex [10,15,36]. As a result, it is proposed that the impaired static encoding of the primary afferents in the muscle spindle is diverted to a secondary preprogrammed compensatory microcircuit further involving the secondary afferents and more synaptic connections [10,15].

4 Lower blink rate in ALS

It has been observed that familial ALS patients had significantly reduced blink rates than sporadic ALS patients and controls [11]. Even earlier it was found that the blink reflex was abnormal in both primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) and ALS [37]. It is unanswered whether the lower blink rate in ALS has a peripheral or central origin [11]. Blinking is transduced by trigeminal and facial nerves by a well-explored three-neural reflex arc [11]. Byrne et al. excluded the motoneuronal origin of the lower blink rate in ALS because the impairment of it would be associated with slower blinks instead of a lower blink rate [11]. Furthermore, they ruled out sensory neural origin based on an earlier clinical view that these nerves are not involved in the ALS pathology [11]. Finally, they proposed that a lower blink rate in familial ALS is central in origin and is probably associated with alteration in the control of spontaneous blinks [11].

Longitudinal follow-up data showed that blink reflex impairments progressed over time in ALS patients, namely, the latencies of R2 and R 2 were delayed, leading to the disappearance of these components at the very late stage of ALS [37]. It has been long known that the blink reflex has two superimposed R2 subcomponents and R2 is more prone to inhibitory effects of repetitive stimulation and prepulses [38]. The dissection of R2 subcomponents is often challenging due to temporal overlap [38]. The gradual disappearance started at a late stage of ALS with the R 2 subcomponent, followed by R2 and R1 and eventually there was no detectable blink reflex [37]. The alteration of the R2 subcomponent is devoted to the direct impairment of the stretch pathway or to other indirect lesions affecting the excitability of the reflex [39]. However, if we factor in sensory contribution, then it might lead us to a different interpretation of the above conclusions, especially in light of the new theory of DOMS [7,10,15].

Note that the electromyogram (EMG) of stretch reflex comprises three components: short latency (largely Type Ia afferent mediated), medium latency (largely dominantly Type II afferent mediated) and long-latency (probably transcortical or subcortical) responses [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. It is important to note that DOMS is suggested to delay the latency of MLR of the stretch reflex [10,15]. Indeed, the recent (unpublished observations) of Sonkodi et al. supported this hypothesis. Earlier findings demonstrated that DOMS do not alter the latency of SLR and LLR [50], as the (unpublished observations) of Sonkodi et al. also found unaltered LLR. They presumed that the delayed latency of MLR is due to the minor alteration of the static encoding of the stretch reflex when monosynaptic Type Ia static proprioceptive encoding is altered to polysynaptic Type II static encoding due to the microdamage of the Piezo2 ion channels at the primary afferent endings in the muscle spindle [10,15]. On the contrary, the dynamic encoding component of the stretch reflex is hardly affected, like in the case of Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy [51], and as a consequence, the SLR remains unaffected [10,15].

Accordingly, the current authors suggest that the SLR (monosynaptic) of the stretch reflex acts analogous with the R1 component (three-neural) of the blink reflex, MLR (polysynaptic) is analogous with the R2 subcomponent (polysynaptic with similar transduction time as R 2 ) and LLR (polysynaptic with even longer transduction than MLR) is almost like the R 2 subcomponent (polysynaptic with similar transduction time as R2 and minor differences in the axon length). Furthermore, the temporal overlap of R2 subcomponents of the blink reflex could be due to the minimal difference in the critical axon length difference in terms of transmission as opposed to the stretch reflex responses of extremities. Since the order of impairment in ALS starts with the R 2 subcomponent, followed by R2 and R1 components of the blink reflex [37], this could be the evidence of four implications. First, there could be a dying-forward mechanism in the late stage of ALS from the central origin to the preserved periphery as was suggested by Byrne et al. [11]; however, we propose that the somatosensory nerves could be paradoxically involved even in this degeneration mechanism because the nonresolving progressive impairment of the proprioceptive circuitry from the periphery could arrive at this stage. Second, there could be a parallel dying-back mechanism at the very late stage of disease progression from impaired proprioceptive sensory neurons to MNs as was suggested by Sonkodi [10]. Third, it is proposed by the current authors that the ALS disease advancement progressively impairs the static encoding of the affected stretch reflexes, including the blink reflex. In line with these implications, EOM are selectively unaffected in ALS [1,16,17,18]. Finally, the impairment of the static encoding of a stretch reflex could also mean the intrusion of our most profound life-sustaining preprogrammed genetic encoding [15]. Correspondingly, Fernández-Trillo et al. highlighted that these Piezo2 containing neurons have different, and most likely principal, genetic signatures [52]. No wonder why Piezo2 knockout mice cannot survive after birth [27,53] due to the lack of the homeostasis maintaining the physiological function of Piezo2 ion channels [27]. Therefore, it is safe to say that any systemic direct or indirect irreversible cause that detaches and impedes the regeneration of Piezo2 containing somatosensory neuron terminals demonstrated to be incompatible with life sustainment.

A recent research study demonstrated that eye blinks of Piezo2-deficient mice were lower than wild types when the blinks were elicited by von Frey filaments [52]. It is important to note on the side that TAD lesion causing platinum-analogue chemotherapy also causes the delay of the blink reflex [54]. The involvement of the Piezo2 ion channel in the blink reflex impairment is compelling in the light of the new theory of DOMS, in which the channelopathy of Piezo2 is also implicated as the critical primary TAD-like lesion in its biphasic noncontact injury mechanism [15,55]. Note that blinks could be evoked despite corneal and conjunctival anesthesia [56], suggesting from the animal model that the spinal trigeminal complex is a principal element as a spontaneous blink generator [11,57]. Earlier findings put forward that the short-latency blink reflex is induced by the stretching of the EOM, thus it could be initiated in the extraocular muscle spindles [19]. Accordingly, the blink reflex could be considered as an oligosynaptic stretch reflex. Note that the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve comprises these muscle spindle-derived primary afferents [19].

Interestingly EOM are relatively spared in ALS [1,16,17,18]. One reason could be that Wnt protein signaling is significantly lower in human limb skeletal muscles of ALS patients than in EOM [18]. Note that increased Wnt signaling stimulates the phosphatidylinositol [4,5]bis-phosphate (PIP2) formation [58], while PIP2 is known to be involved in the control of Piezo2-dependent mechanotransduction [59]. Correspondingly, the current authors suggest that the spared level of Wnt signaling could even save the primary afferent neuromuscular junctions within the muscle spindles of EOM in ALS. Note that this neuromuscular junction in the muscle spindles is proposed to be the locus minoris resistentiae in ALS and the shortage of Wnt signaling could be one explanation for the detachment of Type Ia sensory terminals from intrafusal muscle fibers in striated muscles [10,12]. However, this sparing effect on the somatosensory side could last only until the dying-forward mechanism reaches these proprioceptive nerves. The resultant somatosensory lesions, represented in delayed latency of R2 and later R1 components, could eventually initiate the dying-back mechanism propagating toward the MNs of EOM at the very last stage of ALS disease progression but it is a lengthy process, especially under elevated Wnt signaling circumstances, and therefore it could not evolve to this point.

5 Conclusion

The current authors put forward the late involvement of somatosensory neurons in the unanswered question of whether the lower blink rate in ALS has a peripheral or central origin. At a later stage of ALS disease progression, the impairment of proprioceptive sensory nerves in the EOM muscle spindles could be partially responsible for lower blink reflex, beyond central origin. Moreover, the current authors imply the critical role of Piezo2 ion channels and Wnt-PIP2 signaling in this pathomechanism. The proposed microinjury of Piezo2 on muscle spindle proprioceptive terminals could even provide an explanation for the painless dying-back noncontact injury mechanism theory of ALS.

  1. Funding information: This paper received no external funding.

  2. Conflict of interest: Tibor Hortobágyi is an Editor in Open Medicine, but this fact did not affect the peer-review process.

  3. Data availability statement: Data sharing not applicable.

References

[1] Charcot J-MJA. Deux cas d’atrophie musculaire progressive: avec lésions de la substance grise et des faisceaux antérolatéraux de la moelle épinière. Paris: Masson; 1869.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Hardiman O, van den Berg LH, Kiernan MC. Clinical diagnosis and management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7(11):639–49.10.1038/nrneurol.2011.153Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Hortobagyi T, Cairns NJ. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and non-tau frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;145:369–81.10.1016/B978-0-12-802395-2.00026-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Hough T. Ergographic studies in muscular fatigue and soreness. J Boston Soc Med Sci. 1900;5(3):81–92.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Clarkson PM, Nosaka K, Braun B. Muscle function after exercise-induced muscle damage and rapid adaptation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(5):512–20.10.1249/00005768-199205000-00004Search in Google Scholar

[6] Courtney CA, Aoyagi K, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Madeleine P. Bilateral sensory deficits and widespread hyperalgesia occur following induced delayed onset muscle soreness of the quadriceps. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020;15(1):12–21.10.26603/ijspt20200012Search in Google Scholar

[7] Sonkodi B, Berkes I, Koltai E. Have we looked in the wrong direction for more than 100 years? Delayed onset muscle soreness is, in fact, neural microdamage rather than muscle damage. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(3):212. 10.3390/anitox9030212.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Isaacs JD, Dean AF, Shaw CE, Al-Chalabi A, Mills KR, Leigh PN. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with sensory neuropathy: part of a multisystem disorder? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(7):750–3.10.1136/jnnp.2006.098798Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Seki S, Yamamoto T, Quinn K, Spigelman I, Pantazis A, Olcese R, et al. Circuit-specific early impairment of proprioceptive sensory neurons in the SOD1(G93A) mouse model for ALS. J Neurosci. 2019;39(44):8798–815.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1214-19.2019Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Sonkodi B. Delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS): the repeated bout effect and chemotherapy-induced axonopathy may help explain the dying-back mechanism in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Sci. 2021;11(1):108. 10.3390/brainsci11010108.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Byrne S, Pradhan F, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Treacy M, Cassidy L, Hardiman O. Blink rate in ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2013;14(4):291–3.10.3109/21678421.2012.729217Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Vaughan SK, Kemp Z, Hatzipetros T, Vieira F, Valdez G. Degeneration of proprioceptive sensory nerve endings in mice harboring amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-causing mutations. J Comp Neurol. 2015;523(17):2477–94.10.1002/cne.23848Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Held A, Major P, Sahin A, Reenan RA, Lipscombe D, Wharton KA. Circuit dysfunction in SOD1-ALS model first detected in sensory feedback prior to motor neuron degeneration is alleviated by BMP signaling. J Neurosci. 2019;39(12):2347–64.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1771-18.2019Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Brownstone RM, Lancelin C. Escape from homeostasis: spinal microcircuits and progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurophysiol. 2018;119(5):1782–94.10.1152/jn.00331.2017Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Sonkodi B, Kopa Z, Nyirady P. Post orgasmic illness syndrome (POIS) and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS): do they have anything in common? Cells. 2021;10(8):1867. 10.3390/cells10081867.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Lawyer Jr T, Netsky MG. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1953;69(2):171–92.10.1001/archneurpsyc.1953.02320260029002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Okamoto K, Hirai S, Amari M, Iizuka T, Watanabe M, Murakami N, et al. Oculomotor nuclear pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 1993;85(5):458–62.10.1007/BF00230482Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] McLoon LK, Harandi VM, Brannstrom T, Andersen PM, Liu JX. Wnt and extraocular muscle sparing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(9):5482–96.10.1167/iovs.14-14886Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Bratzlavsky M. Blink reflex in man in response to stretching of extraocular muscles? Eur Neurol. 1972;7(3):146–54.10.1159/000114422Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Breinin GM. Electromyographic evidence for ocular muscle proprioception in man. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1957;57(2):176–80.10.1001/archopht.1957.00930050184003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Sears ML, Teasdall RD, Stone HH. Stretch effects in human extraocular muscle; an electromyographic study. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1959;104(4):174–8.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Matsuo K. Stretching of the Mueller muscle results in involuntary contraction of the levator muscle. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18(1):5–10.10.1097/00002341-200201000-00002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Dancause N, Taylor MD, Plautz EJ, Radel JD, Whittaker T, Nudo RJ, et al. A stretch reflex in extraocular muscles of species purportedly lacking muscle spindles. Exp Brain Res. 2007;180(1):15–21.10.1007/s00221-006-0833-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[24] Nijssen J, Comley LH, Hedlund E. Motor neuron vulnerability and resistance in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2017;133(6):863–85.10.1007/s00401-017-1708-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Weir CR, Knox PC, Dutton GN. Does extraocular muscle proprioception influence oculomotor control? Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(9):1071–4.10.1136/bjo.84.9.1071Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] Ruskell GL. The fine structure of human extraocular muscle spindles and their potential proprioceptive capacity. J Anat. 1989;167:199–214.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Volkers L, Mechioukhi Y, Coste B. Piezo channels: from structure to function. Pflugers Arch. 2015;467(1):95–9.10.1007/s00424-014-1578-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Woo SH, Lukacs V, de Nooij JC, Zaytseva D, Criddle CR, Francisco A, et al. Piezo2 is the principal mechanotransduction channel for proprioception. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18(12):1756–62.10.1038/nn.4162Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[29] Bennett GJ, Liu GK, Xiao WH, Jin HW, Siau C. Terminal arbor degeneration – a novel lesion produced by the antineoplastic agent paclitaxel. Eur J Neurosci. 2011;33(9):1667–76.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07652.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Ovalle WK, Nahirney PC, Netter FH. Netter’s essential histology. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Bewick GS, Banks RW. Spindles are doin’ it for themselves: glutamatergic autoexcitation in muscle spindles. J Physiol. 2021;599:2781–3.10.1113/JP281624Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Suchyna TM. Piezo channels and GsMTx4: two milestones in our understanding of excitatory mechanosensitive channels and their role in pathology. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2017;130(Pt B):244–53.10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.07.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[33] Newham DJ. The consequences of eccentric contractions and their relationship to delayed onset muscle pain. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1988;57(3):353–9.10.1007/BF00635995Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Bewick GS, Reid B, Richardson C, Banks RW. Autogenic modulation of mechanoreceptor excitability by glutamate release from synaptic-like vesicles: evidence from the rat muscle spindle primary sensory ending. J Physiol. 2005;562(Pt 2):381–94.10.1113/jphysiol.2004.074799Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Than K, Kim E, Navarro C, Chu S, Klier N, Occiano A, et al. Vesicle-released glutamate is necessary to maintain muscle spindle afferent excitability but not dynamic sensitivity in adult mice. J Physiol. 2021;599(11):2953–67.10.1113/JP281182Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[36] Sonkodi B, Bardoni R, Hangody L, Radák Z, Berkes I. Does compression sensory axonopathy in the proximal tibia contribute to noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in a causative way? – a new theory for the injury mechanism. Life. 2021;11(5):443.10.3390/life11050443Search in Google Scholar

[37] Podikoglou DG, Avramidis TG, Papadimitriou AL. Blink reflex in primary lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(7):1064–5.10.1136/jnnp.2003.017954Search in Google Scholar

[38] Meincke U, Topper R, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E. The electrically elicited R2 blink reflex consists of distinct subcomponents. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;43(2):91–5.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Kimura J, Lyon LW. Orbicularis oculi reflex in the Wallenberg syndrome: alteration of the late reflex by lesions of the spinal tract and nucleus of the trigeminal nerve. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1972;35(2):228–33.10.1136/jnnp.35.2.228Search in Google Scholar

[40] Thompson AK, Mrachacz-Kersting N, Sinkjaer T, Andersen JB. Modulation of soleus stretch reflexes during walking in people with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. Exp Brain Res. 2019;237(10):2461–79.10.1007/s00221-019-05603-1Search in Google Scholar

[41] Corna S, Grasso M, Nardone A, Schieppati M. Selective depression of medium-latency leg and foot muscle responses to stretch by an alpha 2-agonist in humans. J Physiol. 1995;484(Pt 3):803–9.10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020705Search in Google Scholar

[42] Sinkjaer T, Andersen JB, Nielsen JF. Impaired stretch reflex and joint torque modulation during spastic gait in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol. 1996;243(8):566–74.10.1007/BF00900943Search in Google Scholar

[43] Nardone A, Schieppati M. Medium-latency response to muscle stretch in human lower limb: estimation of conduction velocity of group II fibres and central delay. Neurosci Lett. 1998;249(1):29–32.10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00383-8Search in Google Scholar

[44] Schieppati M, Nardone A. Medium-latency stretch reflexes of foot and leg muscles analysed by cooling the lower limb in standing humans. J Physiol. 1997;503(Pt 3):691–8.10.1111/j.1469-7793.1997.691bg.xSearch in Google Scholar

[45] Sinkjaer T, Andersen JB, Nielsen JF, Hansen HJ. Soleus long-latency stretch reflexes during walking in healthy and spastic humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;110(5):951–9.10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00034-6Search in Google Scholar

[46] Grey MJ, Ladouceur M, Andersen JB, Nielsen JB, Sinkjaer T. Group II muscle afferents probably contribute to the medium latency soleus stretch reflex during walking in humans. J Physiol. 2001;534(Pt 3):925–33.10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00925.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[47] Uysal H, Larsson LE, Efendi H, Burke D, Ertekin C. Medium-latency reflex response of soleus elicited by peroneal nerve stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 2009;193(2):275–86.10.1007/s00221-008-1621-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] af Klint R, Mazzaro N, Nielsen JB, Sinkjaer T, Grey MJ. Load rather than length sensitive feedback contributes to soleus muscle activity during human treadmill walking. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103(5):2747–56.10.1152/jn.00547.2009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Uysal H, Boyraz I, Yagcioglu S, Oktay F, Kafali P, Tonuk E. Ankle clonus and its relationship with the medium-latency reflex response of the soleus by peroneal nerve stimulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21(3):438–44.10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.11.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Hjortskov N, Essendrop M, Skotte J, Fallentin N. The effect of delayed-onset muscle soreness on stretch reflexes in human low back muscles. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2005;15(6):409–15.10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00438.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Vincent JA, Wieczerzak KB, Gabriel HM, Nardelli P, Rich MM, Cope TC. A novel path to chronic proprioceptive disability with oxaliplatin: distortion of sensory encoding. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;95:54–65.10.1016/j.nbd.2016.07.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[52] Fernández-Trillo J, Florez-Paz D, Íñigo-Portugués A, González-González O, Del Campo AG, González A, et al. Piezo2 mediates low-threshold mechanically evoked pain in the cornea. J Neurosci. 2020;40(47):8976–93.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0247-20.2020Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[53] Ranade SS, Woo SH, Dubin AE, Moshourab RA, Wetzel C, Petrus M, et al. Piezo2 is the major transducer of mechanical forces for touch sensation in mice. Nature. 2014;516(7529):121–5.10.1038/nature13980Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[54] Park KY, Park YS, Park YH, Chang HJ, Cho ES, Kim SH, et al. Delay of the blink reflex in patients receiving platinum-analogue chemotherapy. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(1):66–73.10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.66Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[55] Puja G, Sonkodi B, Bardoni R. Mechanisms of peripheral and central pain sensitization: focus on ocular pain. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12(3410):764396.10.3389/fphar.2021.764396Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[56] Naase T, Doughty MJ, Button NF. An assessment of the pattern of spontaneous eyeblink activity under the influence of topical ocular anaesthesia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(4):306–12.10.1007/s00417-004-0990-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Kaminer J, Powers AS, Horn KG, Hui C, Evinger C. Characterizing the spontaneous blink generator: an animal model. J Neurosci. 2011;31(31):11256–67.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6218-10.2011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[58] Cadigan KM, Peifer M. Wnt signaling from development to disease: insights from model systems. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1(2):a002881.10.1101/cshperspect.a002881Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[59] Narayanan P, Hütte M, Kudryasheva G, Taberner FJ, Lechner SG, Rehfeldt F, et al. Myotubularin related protein-2 and its phospholipid substrate PIP2 control Piezo2-mediated mechanotransduction in peripheral sensory neurons. Elife. 2018;7:e32346.10.7554/eLife.32346.019Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-30
Revised: 2022-02-02
Accepted: 2022-02-04
Published Online: 2022-03-01

© 2022 Balázs Sonkodi and Tibor Hortobágyi, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2022-0444/html
Scroll to top button