Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 20, 2021

Psychological Differences between Radicalized and non-Radicalized Muslim Prisoners: A Qualitative Analysis of their Frame Alignment

Mark Stemmler EMAIL logo , Johann Endres , Sonja King , Bianca Ritter and Kristina Becker

Abstract

Do radicalized Muslim prisoners differ from non-radicalized Muslim prisoners with regard to Kruglanski’s (2004) quest for significance (QFS), need for (cognitive) closure (NFC), and their frame alignment regarding ideological and religious issues? To answer this research question N = 26 male inmates from Bavarian prisons were interviewed. The radicalized prisoners or extremists (n = 13) had been identified as Salafi or Jihadi adherents by the Bavarian Office for the Protection of the Constitution (Bayerischer Verfassungsschutz) and therefore had a security note. The comparison group were non-radicalized Muslim inmates (n = 13); the vast majority had a migration background. The audio files of the interviews were transcribed and Mayring’s (2010) qualitative content analysis was applied. The obtained interview material was analyzed twice (each time with a different focus) for psychological differences and characteristics between the two groups of Muslim prisoners. In the first analysis, the interviews were investigated with regard to conspiracy theories, dualistic conception of the world, political sensitivity, collective and individual victimization and religious rigidity. Extremists exhibited a stronger frame alignment with respect to general conspiracy theories, dualistic conception of the world, collective victimization, and political sensitivity. Results also substantiate the idea that extremists exhibit more rigid religious behaviors than non-extremist Muslim prisoners. Contrary to our expectations, the two groups did not differ in various biographical features, for example whether they grew up in a family that actively practiced their religion. In the second analysis, we found that although the overall pattern regarding QFS turned out as expected, the radicalized inmates did not achieve higher values than their non-radicalized counterparts. However, we obtained substantial differences for subcategories of QFS. The extremist prisoners reported more norm violations as a trigger for QFS and more opportunities for gaining significance than non-extremists. This was also true for non-legitimate as well as non-criminal opportunities to gain significance. There was a substantial difference between extremists and non-extremists regarding the overall NFC characteristics. Radicalized prisoners tend to avoid ambiguous situations or uncertainty, they prefer clear, structured processes and firm beliefs. The results suggest that it is possible to differentiate non-radicalized from radicalized Muslims as they showed less quest for significance, less need for closure, less political sensitivity and a less rigorous view on religion.

Funding

This article is based on the research project ‘Islamic radicalization in prison settings – potentials and processes of radicalization’ which was funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG); reference number: STE 923/10).

References

Basra, R. &, Neumann, P. R. (2020, July 22). Prisons and terrorism: Extremist offender management in 10 European countries. https://icsr.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/ICSR-Report-Prisons-and-Terrorism-Extremist-Offender-Management-in-10-European-Countries_V2.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Becker, K. (2020). Das Streben nach Bedeutsamkeit und das Bedürfnis nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit als Motivation bei Straftätern mit vermutetem islamistischem Hintergrund im bayerischen Justizvollzug [The pursuit of significance and the need for cognitive coherence as motivation for offenders with suspected Islamist background in Bavarian prisons]. [Master‘s thesis, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg: Erlangen].Search in Google Scholar

Bjorgo, T. (2011). Dreams and disillusionment: Engagement in and disengagement from militant Extremist groups. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55, 277-285. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-011-9282-9 10.1007/s10611-011-9282-9Search in Google Scholar

Borum, R. (2011). Radicalization into violent extremism I: A review of social science theories. Journal of Strategic Security, 4, 7-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.110.5038/1944-0472.4.4.1Search in Google Scholar

BMI (2019). Verfassungsschutzbericht 2018. Berlin: Bundesministerium des Innern, für Bau und Heimat. [Report on the Protection of the Constitution 2018. Berlin: Federal Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Home Affairs.]Search in Google Scholar

Bouhana, N. &, Wikström, P.-O. H. (2011). Al Qa’ida-influenced radicalisation: A rapid evidence assessment guided by Situational Action Theory – Scientific Report. London: UCL.Search in Google Scholar

Cambridge International Dictionary of English (2014). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Endres, J. &, King, S. (2018). Radikalisierung und Deradikalsierung im Justizvollzug [Radicalization and deradicalization in the prison system]. In M. Walsh, B. Pniewski, M. Kober & A. Armborst (Ed.), Evidenzorientierte Kriminalprävention in Deutschland: Ein Leitfaden für Politik und Praxis [Evidence-Oriented Crime Prevention in Germany: A Guide for Policy and Practice] (pp. 511-530). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-20506-5_27.10.1007/978-3-658-20506-5_27Search in Google Scholar

Goli, M., & Rezaei, S. (2010). House of war: Islamic radicalization in Denmark. Aarhus: Centre for Studies in Islamism and Radicalization (CIR), Aarhus University.Search in Google Scholar

Horgan, J. (2003). The search for the terrorist personality. In A. Silke (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on terrorism and its consequences (pp. 1–27). Chichester, New Jersey: Wiley. Search in Google Scholar

King, S., Endres, J., Schwaß, M., Stemmler, M., Lauchs, L. & Armborst, A. (2018). Prisoners with Islamist relations: Are prisoner files a valuable data source for individual assessment and for research? International Journal of Developmental Science, 12, 129-141. DOI: 10.3233/DEV-17024310.3233/DEV-170243Search in Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W., Chen, X., Dechesne, M., Fishman, S., & Orehek, E. (2009). Fully committed: Suicide bombers‹ motivation and the quest for personal significance. Political Psychology, 30, 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00698.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A.W., & Fishman, S. (2009): Psychological factors in terrorism and counterterrorism: Individual, group, and organizational levels of analysis. Social Issues and Policy Review, 3, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2009.01009.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., & Gunaratna, R. (2012). Terrorism as means to an end: How political violence bestows significance. In P. R. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), Meaning, morality, and choice: The social psychology of existential concerns (pp. 203-213). Washington: American Psychological Association.Search in Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35, 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12163Search in Google Scholar

Kruglanski, A.W., Jasko, K., Webber, D., Chernikova, M., & Molinario, E. (2018). The making of violent extremists. Review of General Psychology, 22, 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1037 %2Fgpr000014410.1037/gpr0000144Search in Google Scholar

LaFree, G. &, Freilich, J. D. (2017) (Eds.). The Handbook of the Criminology of Terrorism. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.10.4324/9781315718118Search in Google Scholar

LaFree, G., Jensen, M., James, P. A., & Safer-Lichtenstein, A. (2018). Correlates of violent political extremism in the United States. Criminology, 56, 233-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12169.Search in Google Scholar

Lösel, F. (in press). Extremism, radicalization and terrorism. In R. Roesch (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of psychology in the real world. London: Routledge Talyor & Francis Group.Search in Google Scholar

Mayring, P. (2001). Combination and integration of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 2, No. 1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.1.967Search in Google Scholar

Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Qualitative content analysis]. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie [Handbook qualitative research in psychology] (pp. 601-613). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar

Moghaddam, F. (2005) The staircase to terrorism. A psychological exploration. American Psychologist, 60(2), 161-9.Search in Google Scholar

Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring Political Mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism, Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(2), 239-260.10.1080/09546550902765508Search in Google Scholar

Neumann, P. (2013) The Trouble with Radicalization. International Affairs, 89(4), 873-893.10.1111/1468-2346.12049Search in Google Scholar

Pisoiu, D. (2014) Radicalization. In J. Cesari (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of European Islam (pp. 770 – 801). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199607976.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199607976 Search in Google Scholar

Pyszczynski, T., Abdollahi, A., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (2006). Crusades and Jihadis: An existential psychological perspective on the psychology of terrorism and political extremism. In J. Victoroff (Eds.), Tangled roots: Social and psychological factors in the genesis of terrorism (pp. 85-97). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ritter, B. (2017). Psychological recruitment strategies of ISIL – a content-based analysis. Radzinowicz Library, Cambridge UniversitySearch in Google Scholar

Ritter, B. (2019). Developmental-psychological pathways of radicalized and non-radicalized prisoners in Bavaria: An analysis of ideological and religious differences. [Master’s thesis. Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg: Erlangen].Search in Google Scholar

Sageman, M. (2008). Leaderless Jihad: Terror networks in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812206784Search in Google Scholar

Schreier, M. (2014). Varianten qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse: ein Wegweiser im Dickicht der Begrifflichkeiten [Variants of qualitative content analysis: a guide through the thicket of terminology]. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 15, No. 1, p. 27).Search in Google Scholar

Silber, M., & Bhatt, A. (2007). Radicalization in the West: The Homegrown Threat. New York: The New York City Police Department, Intelligence Division.Search in Google Scholar

Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380-412). Malden: Blackwell. Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, M., & Horgan, J. (2006) A conceptual framework for addressing psychological process in the development of the terrorist. Terrorism and Political Violence, 18(4), 585-601.10.1080/09546550600897413Search in Google Scholar

Veldhuis. T., & Staun, J. (2009) Islamist radicalisation: A Root Cause Model. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael.Search in Google Scholar

Webber, D., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2017). Psychological factors in radicalization. In G. Lafree & J.D. Freilich (Ed.), The Handbook of Criminology of Terrorism (pp. 33-46). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049Search in Google Scholar

Wikström, P.-O. H., & Bouhana, N. (2017). Analyzing radicalization and terrorism: A Situational Action Theory. In G. Lafree and J. D. Freilich (Eds.), The Handbook of Criminology of Terrorism (pp. 175-186). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Wiktorowicz, Q. (2003). Joining the Cause – Al Muhajiroun and radical Islam. Memphis: Rhodes College. Retrieved From: https://securitypolicylaw.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Wiktorowicz.Joining-the-Cause.pdf Search in Google Scholar

Wiktorowicz, Q. (2004a). Islamic activism: A social movement theory approach. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wiktorowicz, Q. (2004b). Framing jihad: Intramovement framing contests and Al-Qaeda’s struggle for sacred authority. International Review of Social History, 49(S12), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859004001683.Search in Google Scholar

Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). A genealogy of radical Islam. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28, 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100590905057Search in Google Scholar

Verbi Software (2019). MAXDA 2020. Berlin: VERBI Software.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-08-20
Published in Print: 2021-09-14

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/mks-2021-0131/html
Scroll Up Arrow