Abstract
Team-based learning (TBL) has been shown to improve many aspects of student learning, but no previous research has systematically examined the effects of group exams on English as an Additional Language (EAL) students in university classrooms. This study is a small-scale action research examining the role of students’ English language status in their perceptions of and performance in group exams within TBL. The data were collected from 29 students – (13 EAL) and 16 English as a first language (EL1) – attending a third-year university linguistics class in Vancouver, Canada. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used for the data analysis. Results of the study revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of perceptions or performance. Both groups had positive perceptions about group exams and the increase in their performance over the course of the semester was statistically significant. Qualitative results showed that students found group exams helpful for learning and reducing exam anxiety. Students also enjoyed the experience of taking group exams and stated that their attitudes toward the group exams were more positive at the end of the semester.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Spring 2013 Ling 330 class, Kayleigh MacMillan, and the SFU Teaching & Learning Centre. Special thanks to Erin Aspenlieder for motivating the project!
References
Applegate, J. (1995). Cooperative learning in graded tests. The American Biology Teacher, 57(6), 363–364.10.2307/4450015Search in Google Scholar
Bloom, D. (2009). Collaborative test taking: Benefits for learning and retention. College Teaching, 57(4), 216–220.10.3200/CTCH.57.4.216-220Search in Google Scholar
Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1994). Cognitive psychology and instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Chad, P. (2012). The use of team-based learning as an approach to increased engagement and learning for marketing students: A case study. Journal of Marketing Education, 34(2), 128–139.10.1177/0273475312450388Search in Google Scholar
Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(13). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=13.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, M., Nguyen, H., Bray, C., & Levine, R. (2008). Team-based learning in an undergraduate nursing course. The Journal of Nursing Education, 47(3), 111–117.10.3928/01484834-20080301-02Search in Google Scholar
Cortright, R. N., Collins, H. L., Rodenbaugh, D. W., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2003). Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing. Advances in Physiology Education, 27(3), 102–108.10.1152/advan.00041.2002Search in Google Scholar
Cragin, J. (2002). Team based learning in international situations. In L. Michaelsen, A. B. Knight, & L. D. T. Fink, (Eds.), Team-based learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups (pp. 173–182). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.10.4324/9781003447535-15Search in Google Scholar
Croyle, K. L., & Alfaro, E. (2012). Applying team-based learning with Mexican American students in the social science classroom. In M. Sweet & L. K. Michaelsen (Eds.), Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement (pp. 203–220). Sterling, VA: Stylus.10.4324/9781003447528-12Search in Google Scholar
Dunaway, G. A. (2005). Developments: Adaption of team learning to an introductory graduate pharmacology course. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17(1), 56–62.10.1207/s15328015tlm1701_10Search in Google Scholar
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52.10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.004Search in Google Scholar
Feingold, C., Cobb, M., Hernandez Givens, R., Arnold, J., Joslin, S., & Keller, J. (2008). Student perceptions of team learning in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education [Serial Online], 47(5), 214–222.10.3928/01484834-20080501-03Search in Google Scholar
Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar
Fink, L. D. (2004). Beyond small groups: Harnessing the extraordinary power of learning teams. In L. K. Michaelsen, A. B. Knight, and L. D. Fink (Eds.), Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups. Westport: Praeger Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, M., McGrath-Champ, S., Clark, S., & Taylor, L. (2012). The case for assessable in-class team-based learning. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education. University of Sydney.Search in Google Scholar
Gerena, L., & Keiler, L. (2012). Effective intervention with urban secondary English language learners: How peer instructors support learning. Bilingual Research Journal, 35, 1.10.1080/15235882.2012.667372Search in Google Scholar
Ghuman, P. (1999). Asian adolescents in the west. Leicester, UK: BPS Books.Search in Google Scholar
Giuliodori, M. J., Lujan, H. L., & DiCarlo, S. E. (2008). Collaborative group testing benefits high-and low-performing students. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(4), 274.10.1152/advan.00101.2007Search in Google Scholar
Goodson, P. (2004). Working with non-traditional and underprepared students in health education. In L. K. Michaelsen, A. B. Knight, and L. D. Fink (Eds.), Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching (pp. 115–123). Sterling, VA: Stylus.10.4324/9781003447535-9Search in Google Scholar
Grady, S. (2011). Team-based learning in pharmacotherapeutics. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75, 7.10.5688/ajpe757136Search in Google Scholar
Haidet, P., O‘Malley, K. J., & Richards, B. (2002). An initial experience with “team learning” in medical education. Academic Medicine, 77(1), 40–44.10.1097/00001888-200201000-00009Search in Google Scholar
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487Search in Google Scholar
Hoover, J. J. (2011). Response to intervention models: Curricular implications and interventions. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar
Hunt, D. P., et al. (2003). The effect of using team learning in an evidence-based medicine course for medical students. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 15(2), 131–139.10.1207/S15328015TLM1502_11Search in Google Scholar
Institutional Research and Planning (2013)/14 Simon Fraser University Annualized Undergraduate Enrolment report.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Search in Google Scholar
Kapitanoff, S. (2009). Collaborative testing cognitive and interpersonal processes related to enhanced test performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 56–70.10.1177/1469787408100195Search in Google Scholar
Koles, P. G., Stolfi, A., Borges, N., Nelson, S., & Parmelee, D. (2010). The impact of team-based learning on medical students’ academic performance. Academic Medicine, 85(11), 173–174.10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52bedSearch in Google Scholar
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal Learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79–97.10.3102/00346543058001079Search in Google Scholar
McInerney, M., & Fink, J. D. (2003). Team-based learning enhances long-term retention and critical thinking in an undergraduate microbial physiology course. Microbiology Education, 4, 3–12.10.1128/me.4.1.3-12.2003Search in Google Scholar
McWhaw, K., Schnackenberg, H., Clatter, J., & Abrami, P. (2003). From co-operation to collaboration: Helping students become collaborative learners. In R. Gillies and A. Ashman (Eds.), Cooperative learning. New York, Routledge: Taylor & Francis e-Library.Search in Google Scholar
Michaelsen, L. (1992). Team learning: A comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. To Improve the Academy. Paper 249. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, 11, 107–122.10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00211.xSearch in Google Scholar
Michaelsen, L. K., & Black, R. H. (1994). Building learning teams: The key to harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. In S. Kadel and J. Keehner, (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 65–81). State College, PA. National Center for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.Search in Google Scholar
Michaelsen, L. K. A. B. Knight, and L. D. Fink (Eds.), (2002). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.10.5040/9798216023364Search in Google Scholar
Michaelsen, L. K., & Sweet, M. (2011). Team‐based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 128, 41–51.10.1002/tl.467Search in Google Scholar
Minichiello, D. (2001). Chinese voices in a Canadian secondary landscape. Canadian Journal of Education, 26(3), 77–96.10.2307/1602146Search in Google Scholar
Ofstad, W., & Brunner, L. (2013). Team-based learning in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, 4.10.5688/ajpe77470Search in Google Scholar
Palmer, P. (2013). Student perceptions and effectiveness of team-based learning in anatomy. The FASEB Journal 27.1_Meeting Abstracts (2013): 960–919.10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.960.19Search in Google Scholar
Polsaram, P. (2001). Development of higher education institutions: Total Academic Journal. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, C., & Erduran, S. (2004). Learning from international frameworks for assessment: EAL descriptors in Australia and the USA. Language Testing, 21(3), 409–431.10.1191/0265532204lt290oaSearch in Google Scholar
Searle, N., Haidet, P., Kelly, A., Schneider, V., Seidel, C., & Richards, B. (2003). Team learning in medical education: Initial experiences at ten institutions, academic medicine. Research in Medical Education: Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Conference, 78(10 Supplement), 55–58.10.1097/00001888-200310001-00018Search in Google Scholar
Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 241–271.10.3102/00346543050002241Search in Google Scholar
Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69.10.1006/ceps.1996.0004Search in Google Scholar
Sovajassatakul, T., Jitgarun, K., & Shinatrakool, R. (2011). Team-based learning: Perceptions of instructors and students in Thai universities. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 39(8), 11.10.19030/tlc.v8i11.6506Search in Google Scholar
Sweet, M., Michealsen, L. K. Eds. (2012). Team-based learning in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement. LLC: Stylus Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Tsang, K. (2011). Chinese Canadian students’ language learning experience in Canadian Academe [excerpts from SA 356 Paper, 2011]. EAL in FASS, SFU.Search in Google Scholar
Vasan, N. S., DeFouw, D. O., & Compton, S. (2009). A survey of student perceptions of team‐based learning in anatomy curriculum: Favorable views unrelated to grades. Anatomical Sciences Education, 2(4), 150–155.10.1002/ase.91Search in Google Scholar
Wang, W.-C., Chen, P.-H., & Jin, K.-Y. (2015). Item response theory models for wording effects in mixed-format scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75(1), 157–178.10.1177/0013164414528209Search in Google Scholar
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar
Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. E. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the Material Values Scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 72–91.10.1086/374697Search in Google Scholar
Zepke, N., Leach, L., & Butler, P. (2014). “Student engagement: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions.” Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 386–398, DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2013.832160.Search in Google Scholar
©2017 by De Gruyter
