Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter November 27, 2014

Unfair Trade, Exploitation, and Below-Subsistence Wages

Sonja Dänzer

Abstract

The article discusses the relation between the concepts of unfair trade, exploitation, and below-subsistence wages with regard to individual economic transactions. Starting from the common notion that exploitation involves some kind of unfair advantage taking, it asks how “unfair” is to be understood, and what it is that is taken advantage of in exploitative exchanges. On this basis it then explores a line of argument for grounding the claim that below-subsistence wages are exploitative, focusing on the condition of morally transformative voluntary consent to transactions. By analyzing the structure of coercion with regard to threats, offers, and circumstances it comes to the conclusion that consent to an offer is morally non-transformative with regard to legitimizing the outcome of a transaction if the person giving the “consent” has only unacceptable options in absolute terms to choose from, since this reduces “consent” to a mere act of rationality devoid of any normative content. Accordingly, it argues that insofar as below-subsistence wages are unacceptable options in absolute terms, they are to be considered exploitative and an instance of unfair trade.

Correction Statement

Correction added after issue publication on mopp-2014-0010: The DOI of this article has been corrected to: 10.1515/mopp-2014-0010.

References

Anderson, Scott (2006), “Coercion”, in: EdwardN. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/coercion/.Search in Google Scholar

Aristotle (1999), Nicomachean Ethics (second edition), Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, Denis G. (2003), “Philosophical Foundations: Moral Reasoning, Human Rights, and Global Labor Practices”, in: Hartman, Laura, Arnold, Denis G., and Wokutch, Richard E. (eds.), Rising above Sweatshops: Innovative Approaches to Global Labor Challenges, 7799. Westport Conn: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Boda, Zsolt (2001), Conflicting Principles of Fair Trade, Business Ethics Papers. No. 3, Business Ethics Center, Budapest University of Economic Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Carr, Craig L. (2000), On Fairness, Aldershot: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Dänzer, Sonja (2013), What Is Fair Trade? An Investigation into the Ethical Foundations of a Multifaceted Debate, Dissertation, University of Zurich, unpublished.Search in Google Scholar

Feinberg, Joel (1986), Harm to Self, New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

James, Aaron (2005), “Distributive Justice without Sovereign Rule: The Case of Trade”, Social Theory and Practice, 31(4), 533559.Search in Google Scholar

Kurjaniska, Margorzata and Risse, Matthias (2008), “Fairness in trade II: export subsidies and the Fair Trade Movement”, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 7, 2955.Search in Google Scholar

Levin-Waldman, Oren M. (2009), “The Minimum Wage and Competing Ethical Conceptions”, in: Lewin, David and Kaufman, Bruce E. (eds.), Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, Vol. 16, 181210. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, Robert (2007), “What’s Wrong with Exploitation”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 24(2), 137150.Search in Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart (2009) [1859], On Liberty, Stuttgart: Reclam Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, David (2010), “Fair Trade: What Does It Mean and Why Does It Matter?” (Fourth Draft), CSSJ Working Paper Series, SJ013.Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, Onora (1986), Faces of Hunger: An Essay on Poverty, Justice, and Development, London: G. Allen & Unwin.Search in Google Scholar

Parfit, Derek (2003), “Justifiablity to Each Person”, Ratio (new series), XVI, 368390.Search in Google Scholar

Sample, Ruth (2003), Exploitation: What It Is and Why It Is Wrong, Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Scanlon, T.M. (1998), What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Walzer, Michael (1983), Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, Alan (1999), Exploitation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, Alan (2008), “Exploitation”, in: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/exploitation/.Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, Alan (2011), Rethinking the Ethics of Clinical Research: Widening the Lens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yaqub, Muhammad (2013), “Why Don’t They Rebel?The News, November 10 2013, http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-9-213465-Why-dont-they-rebel.Search in Google Scholar

Zuber, Anna (2010), Volenti Non Fit Iniuria? Exploitation If Free Market Transactions, Master Thesis, University of Bern.Search in Google Scholar

Zwolinksi, Matt (2007), “Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(4), 689727.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-11-27
Published in Print: 2014-10-1

©2014 by De Gruyter