Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 7, 2015

The Circumstances of Intergenerational Justice

Eric Brandstedt

Abstract

Some key political challenges today, e.g. climate change, are future oriented. The intergenerational setting differs in some notable ways from the intragenerational one, creating obstacles to theorizing about intergenerational justice. One concern is that as the circumstances of justice do not pertain intergenerationally, intergenerational justice is not meaningful. In this paper, I scrutinize this worry by analysing the presentations of the doctrine of the circumstances of justice by David Hume and John Rawls. I argue that we should accept the upshot of their idea, that justice is context sensitive, even if this at first sight seems to invalidate intergenerational justice. On the basis of moral constructivism, I subsequently provide a fresh reading of the doctrine according to which it conveys the idea that justice is the solution to a practical problem. However, as the problem background is evolving, we need to properly characterize the relevant practical problem in order to make ethical theorizing relevant. Contrary to what has been claimed, the circumstances of justice do not then clash with intergenerational justice, but are the necessary presuppositions for its advancement.

Acknowledgements

For helpful comments I thank Wlodek Rabinowicz, Johan Brännmark, Ylwa Sjölin Wirling, Frits Gåvertsson, Jakob Green Werkmäster, the participants of the higher seminar in practical philosophy at the department of philosophy at Lund university, the referees and the editor of Moral Philosophy and Politics.

References

Abizadeh, A. (2007). “Cooperation, Pervasive Impact, and Coercion: On the Scope (Not Site) of Distributive Justice”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(4): 318–358.Search in Google Scholar

Attas, D. (2009). “A Transgenerational Difference Principle”, in A. Gosseries and L. Meyer (eds.). Intergenerational Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 189–218.Search in Google Scholar

Barry, B. (1978). “Circumstances of Justice and Future Generations”, in R.I. Sikora and B. Barry (eds.). Obligations to Future Generations (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press), pp. 204–248.Search in Google Scholar

Barry, B. (2003). “Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice”, in A. Light and H. Rolston III (eds.). Environmental Ethics. An Anthology (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 487–499.Search in Google Scholar

Doris, J. and Stich, S. (2014). “Moral Psychology: Empirical Approaches”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/moral-psych-emp/.Search in Google Scholar

English, J. (1977). “Justice between Generations”, Philosophical Studies, 31: 91–104.Search in Google Scholar

Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and O’Donoghue, T. (2002). “Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review”, Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2): 351–401.Search in Google Scholar

Gorman, R., Wilson, D.S., and Miller, R. (2005). “Altruistic Punishment and Helping Differ in Sensitivity to Relatedness, Friendship, and Future Interactions”. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 26: 375–387.Search in Google Scholar

Gosseries, A. (2009). “Three Models of Intergenerational Reciprocity”, in A. Gosseries and L. Meyer (eds.). Intergenerational Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 119–146.Search in Google Scholar

Gosseries, A. and Meyer, L.H. (2009). “Introduction – Intergenerational Justice and Its Challenges”, in A. Gosseries and L. Meyer (eds.). Intergenerational Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Hayward, T. (2007). “Human Rights Versus Emission Rights: Climate Justice and the Equitable Distribution of Ecological Space”, Ethics & International Affairs, 21(4): 431–450.Search in Google Scholar

Heyd, D. (2009). “A Value or an Obligation? Rawls on Justice to Future Generations”, in A. Gosseries and L. Meyer (eds.). Intergenerational Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 167–188.Search in Google Scholar

Hubin, C. (1976). “Justice and Future Generations”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(1): 70–83.Search in Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1975/1751). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), rev. P.H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Search in Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1978/1739). A Treatise of Human Nature, L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), rev. P.H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Search in Google Scholar

IPCC. (2014). “Summary for Policymakers”, in C.B. Field, V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L. White (eds.). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Search in Google Scholar

James, A. (2005). “Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(3): 281–316.Search in Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. (2011). The Ethical Project (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar

McKinnon, C. (2012). Climate Change and Future Justice. Precaution, Compensation, and Triage (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge).Search in Google Scholar

Miller, D. (2013). Justice for Earthlings. Essays in Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, O. (1996). Towards Justice and Virtue (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons (New York: Oxford University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1980). “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory”, Journal of Philosophy, 77(9): 515–572.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness. A Restatement, E. Kelly (ed.) (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2005/1993). Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).Search in Google Scholar

Singer, P. (1981). The Expanding Circle (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux).Search in Google Scholar

Sober, E., and Wilson, D.S. (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Street, S. (2006). “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value”, Philosophical Studies, 127: 109–166.Search in Google Scholar

Street, S. (2008). “Constructivism about Reasons”, in Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.). Oxford Studies in Metaethics, vol. 3 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 207–246.Search in Google Scholar

Street, S. (2010). “What Is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics?”, Philosophy Compass, 5(5): 363–384.Search in Google Scholar

Street, S. (2012). “Coming to Terms with Contingency: Humean Constructivism about Practical Reason”, in J. Lenman and Y. Shemmer (eds.). Constructivism in Practical Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 40–59.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-03-07
Published in Print: 2015-05-01

© 2015 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston